Correlation Between Moderate Balanced and Calvert Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Moderate Balanced and Calvert Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Moderate Balanced and Calvert Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Moderate Balanced Allocation and Calvert Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Moderate Balanced and Calvert Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Moderate Balanced with a short position of Calvert Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Moderate Balanced and Calvert Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Moderate Balanced and Calvert Emerging

0.96
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Moderate and Calvert is 0.96. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Moderate Balanced Allocation and Calvert Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Calvert Emerging Markets and Moderate Balanced is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Moderate Balanced Allocation are associated (or correlated) with Calvert Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Calvert Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Moderate Balanced i.e., Moderate Balanced and Calvert Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Moderate Balanced and Calvert Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Moderate Balanced is expected to generate 1.89 times less return on investment than Calvert Emerging. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Moderate Balanced Allocation is 2.2 times less risky than Calvert Emerging. It trades about 0.35 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Calvert Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.3 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  1,819  in Calvert Emerging Markets on April 2, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  97.00  from holding Calvert Emerging Markets or generate 5.33% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy95.24%
ValuesDaily Returns

Moderate Balanced Allocation  vs.  Calvert Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Moderate Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Moderate Balanced Allocation are ranked lower than 8 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Moderate Balanced may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.
Calvert Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Calvert Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 11 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Calvert Emerging showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Moderate Balanced and Calvert Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Moderate Balanced and Calvert Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Moderate Balanced and Calvert Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Moderate Balanced position performs unexpectedly, Calvert Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Calvert Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Calvert Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Moderate Balanced Allocation and Calvert Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Risk-Return Analysis module to view associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
FinTech Suite
Use AI to screen and filter profitable investment opportunities
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals
Portfolio Backtesting
Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios
Technical Analysis
Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data