Microsoft Net Income vs. Price To Sales
| MSFT Stock | USD 401.89 -2.99 -0.74% |
Net Income | First Reported 1985-09-30 | Previous Quarter 27.7 B | Current Value 38.5 B | Quarterly Volatility 7.2 B |
Macro event markers
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.86 | 0.79 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.22 | 0.33 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.29 | 0.41 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.42 | 0.5 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.2 | 0.19 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.24 | 0.27 |
|
|
Profitability metrics here describe how Microsoft converts revenue and assets into earnings and performance context.
Microsoft | Build AI portfolio with Microsoft Stock |
Revenue Breakdown by Segment for Microsoft
Correlation Analysis.
Macro event markers
Microsoft Revenue Breakdown by Earning Segment Details
Earnings estimates provide context for forward-looking performance discussion. The estimates are presented as context for broader analysis and timeframe comparison.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.598 | Dividend Share 3.48 | Earnings Share 15.99 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.167 |
The market value of Microsoft is measured differently than book value, which reflects Microsoft accounting equity. Microsoft's market capitalization is 3.01 T. With a P/B ratio of 7.69, the market values Microsoft well above its book equity. Enterprise value stands at 2.97 T. Intrinsic value is an analytical estimate of Microsoft's underlying worth that can differ from price and book value. Valuation methods help interpret those gaps.
Note that Microsoft's intrinsic value and market price are different measures derived from different inputs. For Microsoft, key inputs include a P/E ratio of 26.64, a P/B ratio of 7.69, a profit margin of 39.04%, and ROE of 34.39%. Market price reflects the current exchange level formed by active bids and offers.
Microsoft Price To Sales vs. Net Income Fundamental Analysis
Peer multiple analysis evaluates Microsoft's pricing efficiency within its industry. Microsoft maintains a second in net income category among its top competitors. It maintains a second in price to sales category among its top competitors . The ratio of Net Income to Price To Sales for Microsoft is about 10,336,490,149 . Net Income is advancing compared to historical levels. Microsoft reported 117.11 Billion in Net Income for the previous period. Comparative pricing ratios position Microsoft within industry norms.Microsoft's Historical Earnings Breakdown by Geography
Microsoft Price To Sales vs. Net Income
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Microsoft |
| = | 101.83 B |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Price to Sales ratio is typically used for valuing equity relative to its own past performance as well as to performance of other companies or market indexes. In most cases, the lower the ratio, the better it is for investors. However, it is advisable for investors to exercise caution when looking at price-to-sales ratios across different industries.
Microsoft |
| = | 9.85 X |
The most critical factor to remember is that the price of equity takes a firm's debt into account, whereas the sales indicators do not consider financial leverage. Generally speaking, Price to Sales ratio shows how much market values every dollar of the company's sales.
Microsoft Price To Sales Comparison
Microsoft is currently under evaluation. in price to sales category among its top competitors.
Microsoft Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Microsoft, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Microsoft will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Microsoft's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Microsoft, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -3 B | -2.9 B | |
| Operating Income | 147.8 B | 155.2 B | |
| Income Before Tax | 142.2 B | 149.3 B | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -4.4 B | -4.2 B | |
| Net Income | 117.1 B | 123 B | |
| Income Tax Expense | 25.1 B | 26.3 B | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 117.1 B | 123 B | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 117.1 B | 123 B | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | 382.9 M | 605.6 M | |
| Net Interest Income | 301.3 M | 316.4 M | |
| Interest Income | 882 M | 1.7 B | |
| Change To Netincome | 1.3 B | 2 B | |
| Net Income Per Share | 12.33 | 12.95 | |
| Income Quality | 1.20 | 1.18 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.74 | 0.58 |
Microsoft Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers for Microsoft are the financial and operational factors that most directly influence its earnings. Investors must contend with a wide range of external shocks - from regulatory changes to commodity price swings - that can disrupt Microsoft's financial results.
Microsoft Earnings Estimation Breakdown
For Microsoft, the next projected earnings per share is 4.0855 based on current analyst consensus. The range of individual analyst forecasts runs from 3.7 to 5.3, reflecting varying views on Microsoft's near-term business performance. Consensus EPS excludes non-recurring items and is calculated from trailing twelve-month operating results.Last Reported EPS
3.70 Lowest | Expected EPS | 5.30 Highest |
Microsoft Earnings Projection Consensus
If consensus earnings estimates imply a fair value above Microsoft's current price, the market may be discounting future earnings more aggressively than analysts. If the market price is ahead of the estimate, the implied premium may require strong execution to sustain. These valuation signals are best used as one input within a multi-method investment framework.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 57 | 93.9% | 5.16 | 4.0855 | 15.99 |
Microsoft Earnings History
Professional analyst coverage of Microsoft synthesizes management guidance, sector trends, and macro assumptions into a consensus EPS estimate. This consensus shapes investor expectations ahead of each earnings release and becomes the reference point for post-report reaction. We recommend reviewing consensus alongside fundamental valuation models before making allocation decisions.Microsoft Quarterly Gross Profit | 55.3 Billion |
Mean reversion in Microsoft's price occurs when temporary dislocations - caused by sentiment extremes, news events, or liquidity shocks - correct back toward the stock's historical fair value.
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
For Microsoft, actual EPS provides a historical record of per-share profitability that investors use to identify trends. Expected EPS for Microsoft projects this figure forward using guidance, industry dynamics, and financial analysis. The higher Microsoft's EPS trajectory, the stronger its implied earnings quality relative to peers.Microsoft Estimated Months Earnings per Share
Investors seeking income from Microsoft should track EPS trends alongside dividend history to assess payout sustainability. EPS that outpaces dividend growth signals expanding coverage; EPS that lags dividend growth raises cut risk. Always complement EPS analysis with a review of operating leverage, working capital trends, and competitive positioning.Microsoft Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
EPS surprise events for Microsoft's have historically correlated with short-term return outliers - both upside and downside. The post-earnings drift effect means that initial surprise reactions can persist over subsequent trading sessions. Analyst estimates contributing to consensus are derived from fundamental models trained on trailing performance and management guidance.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-01-28 | 2025-12-31 | 3.91 | 5.16 | 1.25 | 31 | ||
2025-10-29 | 2025-09-30 | 3.66 | 3.72 | 0.06 | 1 | ||
2025-07-30 | 2025-06-30 | 3.38 | 3.65 | 0.27 | 7 | ||
2025-04-30 | 2025-03-31 | 3.22 | 3.46 | 0.24 | 7 | ||
2025-01-29 | 2024-12-31 | 3.1 | 3.23 | 0.13 | 4 | ||
2024-10-30 | 2024-09-30 | 3.11 | 3.3 | 0.19 | 6 | ||
2024-07-30 | 2024-06-30 | 2.93 | 2.95 | 0.02 | 0 | ||
2024-04-25 | 2024-03-31 | 2.82 | 2.94 | 0.12 | 4 | ||
2024-01-30 | 2023-12-31 | 2.78 | 2.93 | 0.15 | 5 | ||
2023-10-24 | 2023-09-30 | 2.65 | 2.99 | 0.34 | 12 | ||
2023-07-25 | 2023-06-30 | 2.55 | 2.69 | 0.14 | 5 | ||
2023-04-25 | 2023-03-31 | 2.23 | 2.45 | 0.22 | 9 | ||
2023-01-24 | 2022-12-31 | 2.29 | 2.32 | 0.03 | 1 | ||
2022-10-25 | 2022-09-30 | 2.3 | 2.35 | 0.05 | 2 | ||
2022-07-26 | 2022-06-30 | 2.29 | 2.23 | -0.06 | 2 | ||
2022-04-26 | 2022-03-31 | 2.19 | 2.22 | 0.03 | 1 | ||
2022-01-25 | 2021-12-31 | 2.31 | 2.48 | 0.17 | 7 | ||
2021-10-26 | 2021-09-30 | 2.07 | 2.27 | 0.2 | 9 | ||
2021-07-27 | 2021-06-30 | 1.92 | 2.17 | 0.25 | 13 | ||
2021-04-27 | 2021-03-31 | 1.78 | 1.95 | 0.17 | 9 | ||
2021-01-26 | 2020-12-31 | 1.64 | 2.03 | 0.39 | 23 | ||
2020-10-27 | 2020-09-30 | 1.54 | 1.82 | 0.28 | 18 | ||
2020-07-22 | 2020-06-30 | 1.34 | 1.46 | 0.12 | 8 | ||
2020-04-29 | 2020-03-31 | 1.26 | 1.4 | 0.14 | 11 | ||
2020-01-29 | 2019-12-31 | 1.32 | 1.51 | 0.19 | 14 | ||
2019-10-23 | 2019-09-30 | 1.25 | 1.38 | 0.13 | 10 | ||
2019-07-18 | 2019-06-30 | 1.21 | 1.37 | 0.16 | 13 | ||
2019-04-24 | 2019-03-31 | 1 | 1.14 | 0.14 | 14 | ||
2019-01-30 | 2018-12-31 | 1.09 | 1.1 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2018-10-24 | 2018-09-30 | 0.96 | 1.14 | 0.18 | 18 | ||
2018-07-19 | 2018-06-30 | 1.08 | 1.13 | 0.05 | 4 | ||
2018-04-26 | 2018-03-31 | 0.85 | 0.95 | 0.1 | 11 | ||
2018-01-31 | 2017-12-31 | 0.86 | 0.96 | 0.1 | 11 | ||
2017-10-26 | 2017-09-30 | 0.72 | 0.84 | 0.12 | 16 | ||
2017-07-20 | 2017-06-30 | 0.71 | 0.98 | 0.27 | 38 | ||
2017-04-27 | 2017-03-31 | 0.7 | 0.73 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
2017-01-26 | 2016-12-31 | 0.79 | 0.84 | 0.05 | 6 | ||
2016-10-20 | 2016-09-30 | 0.68 | 0.76 | 0.08 | 11 | ||
2016-07-19 | 2016-06-30 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.11 | 18 | ||
2016-04-21 | 2016-03-31 | 0.64 | 0.62 | -0.02 | 3 | ||
2016-01-28 | 2015-12-31 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 0.07 | 9 | ||
2015-10-22 | 2015-09-30 | 0.59 | 0.67 | 0.08 | 13 | ||
2015-07-21 | 2015-06-30 | 0.56 | 0.6 | 0.04 | 7 | ||
2015-04-23 | 2015-03-31 | 0.51 | 0.61 | 0.1 | 19 | ||
2015-01-26 | 2014-12-31 | 0.71 | 0.75 | 0.04 | 5 | ||
2014-10-23 | 2014-09-30 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.05 | 10 | ||
2014-07-22 | 2014-06-30 | 0.6 | 0.55 | -0.05 | 8 | ||
2014-04-24 | 2014-03-31 | 0.63 | 0.68 | 0.05 | 7 | ||
2014-01-23 | 2013-12-31 | 0.68 | 0.78 | 0.1 | 14 | ||
2013-10-24 | 2013-09-30 | 0.54 | 0.62 | 0.08 | 14 | ||
2013-07-18 | 2013-06-30 | 0.75 | 0.66 | -0.09 | 12 | ||
2013-04-18 | 2013-03-31 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 0.04 | 5 | ||
2013-01-24 | 2012-12-31 | 0.75 | 0.76 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2012-10-18 | 2012-09-30 | 0.56 | 0.53 | -0.03 | 5 | ||
2012-07-19 | 2012-06-30 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.05 | 8 | ||
2012-04-19 | 2012-03-31 | 0.57 | 0.6 | 0.03 | 5 | ||
2012-01-19 | 2011-12-31 | 0.76 | 0.78 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2011-10-20 | 2011-09-30 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2011-07-21 | 2011-06-30 | 0.58 | 0.69 | 0.11 | 18 | ||
2011-04-28 | 2011-03-31 | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.05 | 8 | ||
2011-01-27 | 2010-12-31 | 0.68 | 0.77 | 0.09 | 13 | ||
2010-10-28 | 2010-09-30 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.07 | 12 | ||
2010-07-22 | 2010-06-30 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.05 | 10 | ||
2010-04-22 | 2010-03-31 | 0.42 | 0.45 | 0.03 | 7 | ||
2010-01-28 | 2009-12-31 | 0.59 | 0.74 | 0.15 | 25 | ||
2009-10-23 | 2009-09-30 | 0.32 | 0.4 | 0.08 | 25 | ||
2009-07-23 | 2009-06-30 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2009-04-23 | 2009-03-31 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2009-01-22 | 2008-12-31 | 0.49 | 0.47 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
2008-10-23 | 2008-09-30 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2008-07-17 | 2008-06-30 | 0.47 | 0.46 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2008-04-24 | 2008-03-31 | 0.44 | 0.47 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
2008-01-24 | 2007-12-31 | 0.46 | 0.5 | 0.04 | 8 | ||
2007-10-25 | 2007-09-30 | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.06 | 15 | ||
2007-07-19 | 2007-06-30 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-04-26 | 2007-03-31 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
2007-01-25 | 2006-12-31 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 13 | ||
2006-10-26 | 2006-09-30 | 0.31 | 0.35 | 0.04 | 12 | ||
2006-07-20 | 2006-06-30 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2006-04-27 | 2006-03-31 | 0.33 | 0.32 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2006-01-26 | 2005-12-31 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-10-27 | 2005-09-30 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2005-07-21 | 2005-06-30 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2005-04-28 | 2005-03-31 | 0.32 | 0.32 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-01-27 | 2004-12-31 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2004-10-21 | 2004-09-30 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2004-07-22 | 2004-06-30 | 0.29 | 0.28 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2004-04-22 | 2004-03-31 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 0.05 | 17 | ||
2004-01-22 | 2003-12-31 | 0.3 | 0.34 | 0.04 | 13 | ||
2003-10-23 | 2003-09-30 | 0.29 | 0.3 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2003-07-17 | 2003-06-30 | 0.24 | 0.23 | -0.01 | 4 | ||
2003-04-15 | 2003-03-31 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 12 | ||
2003-01-16 | 2002-12-31 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 17 | ||
2002-10-17 | 2002-09-30 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.07 | 33 | ||
2002-07-18 | 2002-06-30 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-04-18 | 2002-03-31 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-01-17 | 2001-12-31 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 0.04 | 19 | ||
2001-10-18 | 2001-09-30 | 0.2 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 10 | ||
2001-07-19 | 2001-06-30 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2001-04-19 | 2001-03-31 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2001-01-18 | 2000-12-31 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2000-10-18 | 2000-09-30 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 9 | ||
2000-07-18 | 2000-06-30 | 0.21 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2000-04-20 | 2000-03-31 | 0.2 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 10 | ||
2000-01-18 | 1999-12-31 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.03 | 14 | ||
1999-10-19 | 1999-09-30 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.02 | 11 | ||
1999-07-19 | 1999-06-30 | 0.18 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 11 | ||
1999-04-20 | 1999-03-31 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 18 | ||
1999-01-19 | 1998-12-31 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 20 | ||
1998-10-20 | 1998-09-30 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 16 | ||
1998-07-16 | 1998-06-30 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 8 | ||
1998-04-22 | 1998-03-31 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 8 | ||
1998-01-21 | 1997-12-31 | 0.1 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 10 | ||
1997-10-20 | 1997-09-30 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-07-17 | 1997-06-30 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-04-17 | 1997-03-31 | 0.08 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 25 | ||
1997-01-17 | 1996-12-31 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 16 | ||
1996-10-21 | 1996-09-30 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-07-22 | 1996-06-30 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-04-18 | 1996-03-31 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 20 |
Use Microsoft in pair-trading
Pair trading with Microsoft can help investors hedge some company-specific exposure by balancing a long view with an offsetting position. The key question is whether the second leg adds real hedge value instead of just creating a more complex version of the same risk.
Microsoft Pair Trading
Microsoft Pair Trading Analysis
Using correlated positions as Microsoft substitutes during tax-loss harvesting allows investors to capture a tax benefit without disrupting portfolio allocation. The key is finding instruments that track Microsoft closely enough to maintain equivalent risk and return.
The correlation of Microsoft with other assets is a key diversification metric. Pairing Microsoft with uncorrelated or negatively correlated instruments can reduce overall portfolio volatility without necessarily reducing expected returns.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Microsoft can be used to frame hedging context. The view can be extended across sectors or other related groups.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Microsoft position
Using Microsoft inside a theme workflow gives investors a structured way to compare related stocks, funds, ETFs, and crypto assets before allocating capital. The practical benefit is that the selected idea can be tuned either for higher upside or for tighter risk control.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Energy ETFs Thematic Idea Now
Energy ETFs
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Energy ETFs theme has 100 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Energy ETFs Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
Additional Tools for Microsoft Stock Analysis
| Portfolio File Import Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format | |
| Technical Analysis Check basic technical indicators and analysis based on most latest market data | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Stock Screener Find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook. | |
| Commodity Channel Use Commodity Channel Index to analyze current equity momentum | |
| Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm | |
| Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume | |
| Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets | |
| Portfolio Backtesting Avoid under-diversification and over-optimization by backtesting your portfolios |