Microsoft Competitors
| MSFT Stock | USD 381.87 -7.15 -1.84% |
Microsoft vs Rapid7 Correlation Overview
Almost no diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between MSFT and RPD stands at 0.94, or Almost no diversification. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving together with Microsoft Stock
Moving against Microsoft Stock
Mean reversion in Microsoft's price occurs when temporary dislocations - caused by sentiment extremes, news events, or liquidity shocks - correct back toward the stock's historical fair value.
Microsoft Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for Microsoft matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Microsoft Company may look attractive on headline returns alone, but deeper analysis often tells a different story. A thorough review of Microsoft's risk-adjusted indicators provides a clearer picture of whether returns are being earned efficiently. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 1.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | -0.18 | 0.00 | 2.60 | 9.06 | |||
| GOOGL | 1.07 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 1.98 | 5.77 | |||
| NVDA | 1.66 | 0.10 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 2.99 | 13.33 | |||
| ORCL | 2.51 | -0.15 | 0.00 | -0.22 | 0.00 | 4.95 | 15.05 | |||
| SPSC | 1.96 | -0.49 | 0.00 | -0.68 | 0.00 | 3.02 | 11.26 | |||
| FTNT | 1.54 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 2.09 | 2.82 | 10.68 | |||
| DOCN | 3.56 | 1.16 | 0.29 | 0.55 | 3.29 | 8.25 | 18.40 | |||
| GDDY | 2.05 | -0.49 | 0.00 | -1.20 | 0.00 | 3.63 | 19.45 | |||
| RPD | 2.80 | -1.24 | 0.00 | -5.64 | 0.00 | 4.22 | 33.19 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Microsoft financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Microsoft operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Microsoft and related stocks such as Apple Inc, Alphabet Class A, and NVIDIA Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | 61.2 M | 41.7 B | 37 B | 39.5 B | 53.4 B | 45.7 B | 48.4 B | 59.5 B | 55.3 B | 57.4 B | 94.7 B | 99.8 B | 97 B | 93.7 B | 112 B | 128.8 B | 135.3 B |
| GOOGL | -6 M | 9.7 B | 10.7 B | 12.7 B | 14.1 B | 16.3 B | 19.5 B | 12.7 B | 30.7 B | 34.3 B | 40.3 B | 76 B | 60 B | 73.8 B | 100.1 B | 132.2 B | 138.8 B |
| NVDA | 4.1 M | 581.1 M | 562.5 M | 440 M | 631 M | 614 M | 1.7 B | 3 B | 4.1 B | 2.8 B | 4.3 B | 9.8 B | 4.4 B | 29.8 B | 72.9 B | 120.1 B | 126.1 B |
| ORCL | 5.9 M | 10 B | 10.9 B | 11 B | 9.9 B | 8.9 B | 9.5 B | 3.6 B | 11.1 B | 10.1 B | 13.7 B | 6.7 B | 8.5 B | 10.5 B | 12.4 B | 14.3 B | 15 B |
| SPSC | -2.2 M | 13.7 M | 1.2 M | 1.1 M | 2.7 M | 4.6 M | 5.7 M | -2.4 M | 23.9 M | 33.7 M | 45.6 M | 44.6 M | 55.1 M | 65.8 M | 77.1 M | 93.3 M | 98 M |
| FTNT | -5.3 M | 62.5 M | 66.8 M | 44.3 M | 25.3 M | 8 M | 32.2 M | 31.4 M | 334.9 M | 331.7 M | 488.5 M | 606.8 M | 857.3 M | 1.1 B | 1.7 B | 1.9 B | 1.9 B |
| DOCN | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -36 M | -40.4 M | -43.6 M | -19.5 M | -27.8 M | 19.4 M | 84.5 M | 259.3 M | 272.2 M |
| GDDY | -270.4 M | -270.4 M | -279.1 M | -199.9 M | -143.3 M | -75.6 M | -16.5 M | 136.4 M | 77.1 M | 137 M | -495.1 M | 242.3 M | 352.2 M | 1.4 B | 936.9 M | 875 M | 918.8 M |
| RPD | -12.4 M | -12.4 M | -12.4 M | -18.9 M | -32.6 M | -49.9 M | -49 M | -45.5 M | -55.5 M | -53.8 M | -98.8 M | -146.3 M | -124.7 M | -149.3 M | 25.5 M | 23.4 M | 24.6 M |
Microsoft Competitive Analysis
To gauge Microsoft's financial strength, comparing it with Apple, Alphabet, and NVIDIA offers useful context. Microsoft is valued at 2891.34 B and generates 281.72 B in revenue. A 34.39% return on equity and 39.04% net margin underscore Microsoft's earnings capacity. Return on equity favors Apple at 152.02%, well ahead of Microsoft at 34.39%. Valuation multiples differ: Microsoft at 26.64x P/E versus Alphabet at 1.30x, suggesting different growth expectations. Microsoft is dwarfed by NVIDIA on market cap at 4197.47 B versus 2891.34 B.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Microsoft Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Microsoft Against Peers
Microsoft's peer analysis compares Microsoft with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Microsoft trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Microsoft leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Revenue growth ranking for Microsoft within its peer group shows whether it is gaining or losing competitive position over time. Peer context for Microsoft adds a relative dimension that standalone analysis of individual metrics cannot provide. Comparing mega-cap peers in Systems Software, Software - Infrastructure, Information Technology can help separate structural strengths from temporary momentum. For peer comparison, Microsoft has a market cap of 2.89 T, P/E of 26.64, profit margin of 39.04%.
This section for Microsoft is built from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds, with harmonization applied to align reporting definitions. Where analyst coverage exists, consensus estimates are factored in. Values may update on different source schedules.