Cisco Systems Net Income vs. Price To Sales
| CSCO Stock | USD 80.89 2.07 2.63% |
Net Income | First Reported 1987-10-31 | Previous Quarter 2.9 B | Current Value 3.2 B | Quarterly Volatility 1.4 B |
Macro event markers
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.7 | 0.6402 |
|
| |||||
| Net Profit Margin | 0.14 | 0.2126 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.28 | 0.2576 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.29 | 0.2662 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.14 | 0.1086 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.25 | 0.2566 |
|
|
This profitability view for Cisco Systems summarizes relationships between earnings and core financial drivers. The dataset reflects how earnings scale across financial statement components.
Revenue Breakdown by Operating Segment
Cisco Systems' top line is composed of 5 product-level revenue streams. At 8.29 Billion, Networking is Cisco Systems' largest segment (54.0%), with Service as the second-largest at 3.71 Billion. While one segment leads, Cisco Systems' remaining product lines provide a degree of revenue balance.
Trending Equities.
Macro event markers
Cisco Systems Revenue by Earnings Segment Overview
Cisco Systems' product-level revenue split is shown below, highlighting each segment's share of total revenue. Observability rounds out the mix at 1.8%, representing Cisco Systems' smallest reported product line.
Projected earnings help describe the expected financial trajectory for Cisco Systems. Earnings context for Cisco Systems is presented alongside other analytical inputs.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.312 | Dividend Share 1.64 | Earnings Share 2.78 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.097 |
The gap between Cisco Systems' market value and book value reflects how the market perceives future potential versus historical cost.
Cisco Systems' value is shaped by fundamental inputs, whereas price is shaped by supply and demand dynamics. The observed price for Cisco Systems captures the most recent agreement between transacting parties.
Cisco Systems Price To Sales vs. Net Income Fundamental Analysis
Comparative pricing analysis measures Cisco Systems's value against industry norms. Cisco Systems lands at #3 in net income compared to key competitors. It is rated below average in price to sales compared to key competitors . The spread between Net Income and Price To Sales for Cisco Systems sits at 1,982,137,439 . Net Income is evolving in line with broader financial reporting trends. A year ago, Cisco Systems reported Net Income at 11.71 Billion. Earnings-based multiples benchmark Cisco Systems's market valuation.Cisco Price To Sales vs. Net Income
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Cisco Systems |
| = | 10.45 B |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Price to Sales ratio is typically used for valuing equity relative to its own past performance as well as to performance of other companies or market indexes. In most cases, the lower the ratio, the better it is for investors. However, it is advisable for investors to exercise caution when looking at price-to-sales ratios across different industries.
Cisco Systems |
| = | 5.27 X |
The most critical factor to remember is that the price of equity takes a firm's debt into account, whereas the sales indicators do not consider financial leverage. Generally speaking, Price to Sales ratio shows how much the market values every dollar of the company's sales.
Cisco Price To Sales Comparison
Cisco Systems is currently under evaluation in price to sales compared to key competitors.
Cisco Systems Profitability Projections
Lasting profit growth at Cisco Systems depends on the mix of revenue growth, cost control, and pricing power. The direction and pace of Cisco Systems' profit changes give forward-looking signals for investors. Cisco Systems currently maintains a profit margin of 18.8%.
| Last Reported | End Of Year Estimate | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -858.6 M | -815.7 M | |
| Operating Income | 13.5 B | 7.4 B | |
| Income Before Tax | 12.8 B | 7.7 B | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -759 M | -721 M | |
| Net Income | 12 B | 12.6 B | |
| Income Tax Expense | 1.1 B | 1.9 B | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 11.7 B | 9 B | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 11.7 B | 10.2 B | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | 998.2 M | 1.1 B | |
| Interest Income | 1.2 B | 1.1 B | |
| Net Interest Income | -532.8 M | -506.2 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 690 M | 1.1 B | |
| Net Income Per Share | 2.51 | 2.63 | |
| Income Quality | 1.46 | 1.39 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.80 | 0.58 |
Cisco Profitability Driver Comparison
The key profitability drivers of Cisco Systems determine how much profit the company generates over time. External shocks can disrupt Cisco Systems' financial results at any time, adding an inherent layer of unpredictability. Understanding these drivers helps investors separate temporary disruptions from structural changes in Cisco Systems' profits. Track changes in Cisco Systems' profitability drivers to maintain a current view of its investment attractiveness.
Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The forward EPS consensus for Cisco Systems stands at 1.0349, compiled from analyst models tracking Cisco Systems' revenue, margin, and guidance trends. The estimate range spans from 1.0251 to 1.06, capturing uncertainty around the projection. This figure is derived from a 12-month earnings base and strips out one-time items for comparability.Last Reported EPS
1.03 Lowest | Expected EPS | 1.06 Highest |
Earnings Projection Consensus
The spread between Cisco Systems' estimated fair value and its market price encodes a directional signal: narrow spreads suggest efficient pricing; wide spreads suggest a potential catalyst or mispricing. Analysts use this gap to identify entry and exit points, though the estimate itself carries model risk. Factor in liquidity, sector context, and macro environment before acting on this comparison.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 30th of April 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 26 | 96.66% | 1.04 | 1.0349 | 2.78 |
Earnings History
Analyst consensus earnings for Cisco represent the collective market expectation for upcoming reporting periods. When actual EPS exceeds this benchmark, markets typically respond positively; misses often lead to rapid repricing. Comparing consensus to alternative valuation signals adds analytical depth beyond raw EPS numbers.Cisco Systems Quarterly Gross Profit | 9.97 Billion |
Experienced investors tracking Cisco Systems' watch for mean reversion setups where price has deviated from its long-run average. Sentiment extremes, news events, or liquidity shocks are common catalysts for these temporary dislocations in Cisco Systems. Prices periodically overshoot their intrinsic value in both directions, creating mean reversion opportunities in Cisco Systems. The mean reversion signal is most useful when combined with fundamental confirmation for Cisco Systems'.
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
The actual EPS reported by Cisco Systems reflects real earnings performance verified through its financial statements. The expected EPS consensus for Cisco Systems is the result of analyst modeling and represents the market's pre-event benchmark. Weighted share count is used to normalize EPS across periods where the number of outstanding shares changes.Estimated Months Earnings per Share
Income investors tracking Cisco Systems rely on EPS as a measure of earnings coverage for the dividend. A consistent EPS growth trajectory suggests management has both the intent and capacity to increase shareholder distributions over time. For a rounded view, compare EPS against free cash flow yield and the dividend payout ratios of sector peers.Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
For investors monitoring Cisco Systems, earnings surprise data provides a historical record of how the market has repriced the stock after each quarterly report. Surprise direction and magnitude together determine whether a post-earnings move is likely to be sustained. Analyst EPS estimates evolve through the quarter based on guidance revisions and new sector information.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-02-10 | 2026-01-31 | 1.02 | 1.04 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2025-11-12 | 2025-10-31 | 0.98 | 1.0 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2025-08-13 | 2025-07-31 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2025-05-14 | 2025-04-30 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.04 | 4 | ||
2025-02-12 | 2025-01-31 | 0.91 | 0.94 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2024-11-13 | 2024-10-31 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.04 | 4 | ||
2024-08-14 | 2024-07-31 | 0.85 | 0.87 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2024-05-15 | 2024-04-30 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.06 | 7 | ||
2024-02-14 | 2024-01-31 | 0.84 | 0.87 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2023-11-15 | 2023-10-31 | 1.03 | 1.11 | 0.08 | 7 | ||
2023-08-16 | 2023-07-31 | 1.06 | 1.14 | 0.08 | 7 | ||
2023-05-17 | 2023-04-30 | 0.97 | 1.0 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2023-02-15 | 2023-01-31 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2022-11-16 | 2022-10-31 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2022-08-17 | 2022-07-31 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2022-05-18 | 2022-04-30 | 0.86 | 0.87 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2022-02-16 | 2022-01-31 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2021-11-17 | 2021-10-31 | 0.8 | 0.82 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2021-08-18 | 2021-07-31 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2021-05-19 | 2021-04-30 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2021-02-08 | 2021-01-31 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2020-11-12 | 2020-10-31 | 0.7 | 0.76 | 0.06 | 8 | ||
2020-08-12 | 2020-07-31 | 0.74 | 0.8 | 0.06 | 8 | ||
2020-05-13 | 2020-04-30 | 0.69 | 0.79 | 0.1 | 14 | ||
2020-02-12 | 2020-01-31 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2019-11-13 | 2019-10-31 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2019-08-14 | 2019-07-31 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2019-05-15 | 2019-04-30 | 0.77 | 0.78 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2019-02-13 | 2019-01-31 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2018-11-14 | 2018-10-31 | 0.72 | 0.75 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
2018-08-15 | 2018-07-31 | 0.69 | 0.7 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2018-05-16 | 2018-04-30 | 0.65 | 0.66 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2018-02-14 | 2018-01-31 | 0.59 | 0.63 | 0.04 | 6 | ||
2017-11-15 | 2017-10-31 | 0.6 | 0.61 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2017-08-16 | 2017-07-31 | 0.61 | 0.61 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2017-05-17 | 2017-04-30 | 0.58 | 0.6 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2017-02-15 | 2017-01-31 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2016-11-16 | 2016-10-31 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2016-08-17 | 2016-07-31 | 0.6 | 0.63 | 0.03 | 5 | ||
2016-05-18 | 2016-04-30 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2016-02-10 | 2016-01-31 | 0.54 | 0.57 | 0.03 | 5 | ||
2015-11-12 | 2015-10-31 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.03 | 5 | ||
2015-08-12 | 2015-07-31 | 0.56 | 0.59 | 0.03 | 5 | ||
2015-05-13 | 2015-04-30 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2015-02-11 | 2015-01-31 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2014-11-12 | 2014-10-31 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2014-08-13 | 2014-07-31 | 0.53 | 0.55 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2014-05-14 | 2014-04-30 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
2014-02-12 | 2014-01-31 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2013-11-13 | 2013-10-31 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2013-08-14 | 2013-07-31 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2013-05-15 | 2013-04-30 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2013-02-13 | 2013-01-31 | 0.48 | 0.51 | 0.03 | 6 | ||
2012-11-13 | 2012-10-31 | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2012-08-15 | 2012-07-31 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2012-05-09 | 2012-04-30 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2012-02-08 | 2012-01-31 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.04 | 9 | ||
2011-11-09 | 2011-10-31 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.04 | 10 | ||
2011-08-10 | 2011-07-31 | 0.38 | 0.4 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2011-05-11 | 2011-04-30 | 0.37 | 0.42 | 0.05 | 13 | ||
2011-02-09 | 2011-01-31 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2010-11-10 | 2010-10-31 | 0.4 | 0.42 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2010-08-11 | 2010-07-31 | 0.42 | 0.43 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2010-05-12 | 2010-04-30 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.03 | 7 | ||
2010-02-03 | 2010-01-31 | 0.35 | 0.4 | 0.05 | 14 | ||
2009-11-04 | 2009-10-31 | 0.31 | 0.36 | 0.05 | 16 | ||
2009-08-05 | 2009-07-31 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2009-05-06 | 2009-04-30 | 0.24 | 0.3 | 0.06 | 25 | ||
2009-02-04 | 2009-01-31 | 0.3 | 0.32 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2008-11-05 | 2008-10-31 | 0.39 | 0.42 | 0.03 | 7 | ||
2008-08-05 | 2008-07-31 | 0.39 | 0.4 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2008-05-06 | 2008-04-30 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2008-02-06 | 2008-01-31 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-11-07 | 2007-10-31 | 0.36 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2007-08-07 | 2007-07-31 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2007-05-08 | 2007-04-30 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2007-02-06 | 2007-01-31 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2006-11-08 | 2006-10-31 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2006-08-08 | 2006-07-31 | 0.28 | 0.3 | 0.02 | 7 | ||
2006-05-09 | 2006-04-30 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.03 | 11 | ||
2006-02-07 | 2006-01-31 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2005-11-09 | 2005-10-31 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2005-08-09 | 2005-07-31 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-05-10 | 2005-04-30 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2005-02-08 | 2005-01-31 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2004-11-09 | 2004-10-31 | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2004-08-10 | 2004-07-31 | 0.2 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2004-05-11 | 2004-04-30 | 0.18 | 0.19 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2004-02-03 | 2004-01-31 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2003-11-05 | 2003-10-31 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.02 | 13 | ||
2003-08-05 | 2003-07-31 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2003-05-06 | 2003-04-30 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.01 | 7 | ||
2003-02-04 | 2003-01-31 | 0.13 | 0.15 | 0.02 | 15 | ||
2002-11-06 | 2002-10-31 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 7 | ||
2002-08-06 | 2002-07-31 | 0.12 | 0.14 | 0.02 | 16 | ||
2002-05-07 | 2002-04-30 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 22 | ||
2002-02-06 | 2002-01-31 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 80 | ||
2001-11-05 | 2001-10-31 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 100 | ||
2001-08-07 | 2001-07-31 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2001-05-08 | 2001-04-30 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 200 | ||
2001-02-06 | 2001-01-31 | 0.19 | 0.18 | -0.01 | 5 | ||
2000-11-06 | 2000-10-31 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2000-08-08 | 2000-07-31 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 6 | ||
2000-05-09 | 2000-04-30 | 0.13 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 7 | ||
2000-02-08 | 2000-01-31 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1999-11-09 | 1999-10-31 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 9 | ||
1999-08-10 | 1999-07-31 | 0.1 | 0.11 | 0.01 | 10 | ||
1999-05-11 | 1999-04-30 | 0.09 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 11 | ||
1999-02-02 | 1999-01-31 | 0.09 | 0.1 | 0.01 | 11 | ||
1998-11-04 | 1998-10-31 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 12 | ||
1998-08-04 | 1998-07-31 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1998-05-05 | 1998-04-30 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 14 | ||
1998-02-03 | 1998-01-31 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-11-04 | 1997-10-31 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 16 | ||
1997-08-05 | 1997-07-31 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-05-06 | 1997-04-30 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-02-04 | 1997-01-31 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-11-05 | 1996-10-31 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-08-15 | 1996-07-31 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 25 | ||
1996-05-09 | 1996-04-30 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.0 | 0 |
Use Cisco Systems in pair-trading
A pair strategy built around Cisco Systems is useful when investors want to reduce directional market exposure while still expressing a relative-value idea. A disciplined pair strategy still requires monitoring because correlation can weaken when market regimes change.
Cisco Systems Pair Trading
Cisco Systems Pair Trading Analysis
Tax-loss harvesting on Cisco Systems requires identifying a similar asset for the 30-day wash-sale period. Assets with high correlation to Cisco Systems can serve as substitutes while preserving market exposure. Institutional investors use correlation analysis to build Cisco Systems replacement strategies beyond sector matching. Tax-aware investors benefit from systematic correlation analysis when managing Cisco Systems positions.
Correlation analysis for Cisco Systems reveals which assets move together and which provide hedging benefits. Pairing Cisco Systems with uncorrelated instruments can reduce portfolio volatility without reducing expected returns. Readings above 0.8 indicate strongly correlated pairs with minimal diversification benefit around Cisco Systems. Investors who monitor Cisco Systems correlations can identify regime changes before they impact portfolio risk.
Hedging context for Cisco Systems can be developed through Correlation analysis and pair trading analysis.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Cisco Systems position
At 311.43 Billion in the Communication Equipment space, Cisco Systems large-cap profile gives investors a structured starting point for building sector-aligned themes. Anchoring a Communication Equipment theme around Cisco Systems at 311.43 Billion can be tuned for upside participation or tighter downside control depending on Technology outlook.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Natural Foods Thematic Idea Now
Natural Foods
Companies producing natural foods including dairy products and different types of meets. The Natural Foods theme has 40 constituents at this time.
Whether used as a passive allocation or an active trading idea, the Natural Foods Theme provides a structured starting point for portfolio construction.
| View All Next | Launch |