Cisco Systems Competitors
| CSCO Stock | USD 82.16 0.33 0.40% |
Cisco Systems vs Arista Networks Correlation Overview
Weak diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between Cisco Systems and Arista Networks stands at 0.42, or Weak diversification. A 0.42 reading means Cisco Systems and Arista Networks have partial price overlap, offering some diversification benefit.
Moving against Cisco Stock
Experienced investors tracking Cisco Systems' watch for mean reversion setups where price has deviated from its long-run average. Sentiment extremes, news events, or liquidity shocks are common catalysts for these temporary dislocations in Cisco Systems. Prices periodically overshoot their intrinsic value in both directions, creating mean reversion opportunities in Cisco Systems. The mean reversion signal is most useful when combined with fundamental confirmation for Cisco Systems'.
Cisco Systems Competition Correlation Matrix
Studying peer correlation around Cisco Systems gives investors a cleaner read on how much independent price behavior still exists across the competitive set. Used correctly, correlation analysis helps separate broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Cisco Systems Company can look attractive on recent price action while risk efficiency lags the peer group. Reviewing Cisco Systems' risk-adjusted indicators gives a clearer view of whether returns are being earned efficiently. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | 1.98 | -0.20 | 0.00 | -0.17 | 0.00 | 2.76 | 18.28 | |||
| SAP | 1.81 | -0.48 | 0.00 | -0.63 | 0.00 | 3.08 | 19.03 | |||
| MU | 3.48 | 0.82 | 0.22 | 0.48 | 3.17 | 7.76 | 20.06 | |||
| CRM | 1.87 | -0.47 | 0.00 | -0.80 | 0.00 | 3.41 | 10.53 | |||
| MSI | 0.97 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 2.61 | 0.67 | 2.00 | 9.98 | |||
| UBER | 1.55 | -0.09 | 0.00 | -0.21 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 11.09 | |||
| LRCX | 2.84 | 0.71 | 0.19 | 0.27 | 3.07 | 6.99 | 17.49 | |||
| AMAT | 2.37 | 0.71 | 0.21 | 0.35 | 2.77 | 5.75 | 14.36 | |||
| QCOM | 1.34 | -0.35 | 0.00 | -0.34 | 0.00 | 1.78 | 11.94 | |||
| ANET | 2.65 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 2.77 | 5.41 | 15.27 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Cisco Systems financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Cisco Systems operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Cisco Systems and related stocks such as International Business, SAP SE ADR, and Micron Technology Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IBM | 6.6 B | 15.9 B | 16.6 B | 16.5 B | 12 B | 13.2 B | 11.9 B | 5.8 B | 8.7 B | 9.4 B | 5.6 B | 5.7 B | 1.6 B | 7.5 B | 6 B | 10.6 B | 8 B |
| SAP | 567.5 M | 3.4 B | 2.8 B | 3.3 B | 3.3 B | 3.1 B | 3.6 B | 4 B | 4.1 B | 3.3 B | 5.1 B | 5.3 B | 2.3 B | 6.1 B | 3.1 B | 7 B | 7.4 B |
| MU | 200 K | -1 B | 1.2 B | 3 B | 2.9 B | -276 M | 5.1 B | 14.1 B | 6.3 B | 2.7 B | 5.9 B | 8.7 B | -5.8 B | 778 M | 8.5 B | 9.8 B | 10.3 B |
| CRM | -31.7 M | -11.6 M | -270.4 M | -232.2 M | -262.7 M | -47.4 M | 323 M | 127.5 M | 1.1 B | 126 M | 4.1 B | 1.4 B | 208 M | 4.1 B | 6.2 B | 7.5 B | 7.8 B |
| MSI | 72 M | 1.2 B | 881 M | 1.1 B | 1.3 B | 610 M | 560 M | -155 M | 966 M | 868 M | 949 M | 1.2 B | 1.4 B | 1.7 B | 1.6 B | 2.2 B | 2.3 B |
| LRCX | 1.7 M | 168.7 M | 113.9 M | 632.3 M | 655.6 M | 914 M | 1.7 B | 2.4 B | 2.2 B | 2.3 B | 3.9 B | 4.6 B | 4.5 B | 3.8 B | 5.4 B | 6.2 B | 6.5 B |
| AMAT | 9.3 M | 109 M | 256 M | 1.1 B | 1.4 B | 1.7 B | 3.5 B | 3 B | 2.7 B | 3.6 B | 5.9 B | 6.5 B | 6.9 B | 7.2 B | 7 B | 8 B | 8.5 B |
| QCOM | -17.1 M | 6.1 B | 6.9 B | 8 B | 5.3 B | 5.7 B | 2.5 B | -5 B | 4.4 B | 5.2 B | 9 B | 12.9 B | 7.2 B | 10.1 B | 5.5 B | 6.4 B | 3.3 B |
| ANET | 34 M | 34 M | 21.3 M | 42.5 M | 86.8 M | 121.1 M | 184.2 M | 423.2 M | 328.1 M | 859.9 M | 634.6 M | 840.9 M | 1.4 B | 2.1 B | 2.9 B | 3.5 B | 3.7 B |
Cisco Systems Competitive Analysis
Cisco Systems' competitive standing becomes clearer when measured alongside International Business, S A P, and Micron Technology. With 56.65 B in revenue and a 323.32 B market value, Cisco Systems anchors one end of the peer spectrum. Shareholders see a 23.75% return on equity, supported by a 18.76% profit margin. International Business leads with 35.16% return on equity versus 23.75% for Cisco Systems. Valuation multiples differ: S A P at 39.46x P/E versus Cisco Systems at 17.95x, suggesting different growth expectations. On the bottom line, Micron Technology retains 41.49% while Cisco Systems manages 18.76%.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Cisco Systems Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Cisco Systems Against Peers
Cisco Systems' peer analysis compares Cisco Systems with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Cisco Systems trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Cisco Systems leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Dividend growth at Cisco Systems has outpaced most competitors, suggesting management sees durable cash flow ahead. All values are based on available data and provided as reference information. Peer benchmarking can improve context for valuation without relying only on standalone multiples. For peer comparison, Cisco Systems has a market cap of 323.32 B, P/E of 17.95, profit margin of 18.76%.
The analytics block for Cisco Systems relies on periodic company reporting and market reference feeds, with quality checks and normalization applied before rendering. Sell-side coverage, where present, supplements the data shown. Timing can vary by data vendor.