ScanSource Competitors
| SCSC Stock | USD 36.17 -0.03 -0.08% |
Pair Correlation for ScanSource and GigaCloud Technology Overview
Modest diversification
Across the chosen horizon, SCSC and GCT show a correlation of 0.22 and fall into the Modest diversification bucket. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.
Moving together with ScanSource Stock
Moving against ScanSource Stock
Mean reversion in ScanSource is more reliable over longer time horizons. Short-term deviations can persist and even widen before correcting, making position sizing and risk management critical.
ScanSource Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between ScanSource and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between ScanSource Stock performing well and ScanSource Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze ScanSource's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTGR | 1.59 | -0.32 | 0.00 | -0.42 | 0.00 | 2.34 | 10.74 | |||
| MGIC | 956.85 | 487.45 | 95.98 | 5.11 | 0.00 | 4.98 | 32,065 | |||
| SSYS | 2.46 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 6.06 | 21.85 | |||
| AOSL | 1.93 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 2.46 | 5.90 | 14.63 | |||
| CTLP | 0.56 | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.17 | 0.00 | 1.21 | 3.66 | |||
| CLMB | 2.15 | -0.36 | 0.00 | -0.39 | 0.00 | 4.03 | 16.27 | |||
| SKYT | 3.74 | 0.82 | 0.19 | 0.31 | 3.64 | 8.93 | 29.53 | |||
| DAKT | 2.15 | 0.40 | 0.12 | 0.33 | 2.89 | 3.98 | 27.44 | |||
| ARQQ | 3.69 | -0.95 | 0.00 | -0.28 | 0.00 | 7.05 | 25.62 | |||
| GCT | 2.96 | 0.28 | 0.08 | 0.19 | 3.13 | 5.71 | 38.67 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in ScanSource financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of ScanSource operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare ScanSource and related stocks such as NETGEAR, Magic Software, and Stratasys Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTGR | 2.7 M | 91.4 M | 86.5 M | 55.2 M | 8.8 M | 48.6 M | 75.9 M | 19.4 M | -2.6 M | 25.8 M | 58.3 M | 49.4 M | -69 M | -104.8 M | 12.4 M | -32.8 M | -31.2 M |
| SSYS | -1000 K | 20.6 M | 8.5 M | -27 M | -119.4 M | -1.4 B | -77.2 M | -40 M | -11 M | -10.8 M | -443.7 M | -62 M | -29 M | -123.1 M | -120.3 M | -104.3 M | -109.5 M |
| AOSL | -31.1 M | 12.9 M | -5.6 M | -3.3 M | -7.9 M | -2.9 M | 13.8 M | 14.3 M | -14.6 M | -6.6 M | 58.1 M | 453.2 M | 12.4 M | -11.1 M | -97 M | -111.5 M | -105.9 M |
| CTLP | -2.5 M | -5.2 M | 854.1 K | 27.5 M | -819.5 K | -6.8 M | -1.9 M | -11.3 M | -32 M | -40.6 M | -8.7 M | -1.7 M | 633 K | 12 M | 64.5 M | 74.2 M | 77.9 M |
| CLMB | 1.1 M | 5.5 M | 5.5 M | 6.4 M | 5.8 M | 5.8 M | 5.9 M | 5.1 M | 3.5 M | 6.8 M | 4.5 M | 9.2 M | 12.2 M | 12.3 M | 18.6 M | 21.3 M | 22.4 M |
| SKYT | -65 K | -65 K | -65 K | -65 K | -65 K | -65 K | -65 K | -65 K | -65 K | -16.4 M | -20.6 M | -50.7 M | -36.9 M | -30.8 M | -6.8 M | 118.9 M | 124.9 M |
| DAKT | 1.1 M | 8.5 M | 22.8 M | 22.2 M | 20.9 M | 2.1 M | 10.3 M | 5.6 M | -958 K | 491 K | 10.9 M | 592 K | 6.8 M | 34.6 M | -10.1 M | -11.6 M | -11.1 M |
| ARQQ | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | 1 M | -568 K | -271.7 M | 65.1 M | -70.4 M | -54.6 M | -35.3 M | -31.8 M | -33.4 M |
| GCT | 2.9 M | 2.9 M | 2.9 M | 2.9 M | 2.9 M | 2.9 M | 2.9 M | 2.9 M | 2.9 M | 2.9 M | 37.5 M | 29.3 M | 24 M | 94.1 M | 125.8 M | 137.4 M | 70.8 M |
ScanSource Competitive Analysis
Competitive analysis of ScanSource helps investors understand the drivers behind ScanSource's financial results. Benchmarking ScanSource's performance against peers helps reveal whether its growth and profitability are sustainable. How does ScanSource measure up against NETGEAR, Magic Software, and Stratasys? The financials tell a nuanced story. ScanSource operates at a 794.3 M scale with 3.04 B flowing through the income statement. A 8.16% return on equity and 2.44% net margin underscore ScanSource's earnings capacity. The gap between ScanSource and NETGEAR is instructive. Revenue tilts toward ScanSource at 3.04 B compared with 693.4 M. Meanwhile, Magic Software provides a different benchmark. The market prices Magic Software more richly at 35.52x earnings, while ScanSource trades at 8.85x. Meanwhile, Stratasys provides a different benchmark. Profit margins tilt toward ScanSource at 2.44% against Stratasys at -18.92%. These relative benchmarks offer a starting framework, but investors should pair them with forward guidance and sector trends before drawing definitive conclusions about ScanSource's standing.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
ScanSource Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze ScanSource Against Peers
ScanSource's peer analysis compares ScanSource with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether ScanSource trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where ScanSource leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.