Monolithic Power Competitors
| MPWR Stock | USD 1,069 -23.84 -2.18% |
Pair Correlation for Monolithic Power and Atlassian Corp View
Pay attention - limited upside
The correlation between MPWR and TEAM is -0.77, which Macroaxis classifies as Pay attention - limited upside for the selected horizon. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.
Moving together with Monolithic Stock
| 0.76 | ASM | ASM International | PairCorr |
| 0.71 | INTC | Intel Downward Rally | PairCorr |
| 0.68 | BESI | BE Semiconductor | PairCorr |
| 0.82 | TYGO | Tigo Energy Tech Boost | PairCorr |
Moving against Monolithic Stock
The mean reversion tendency in Monolithic Power's price is a well-documented phenomenon that disciplined investors can exploit by identifying when price has diverged substantially from fundamental and historical anchors.
Monolithic Power Competition Correlation Matrix
Reviewing how Monolithic Power Systems moves relative to competing stocks can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. A reading near +1 usually means prices have moved in tandem, a reading near -1 suggests opposite movement, and a reading near zero points to weaker historical dependence.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Surface-level performance for Monolithic Stock can mask how the business actually stacks up against its competitive set. A thorough review of Monolithic Power's risk-adjusted indicators provides a clearer picture of whether returns are being earned efficiently. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NXPI | 1.72 | -0.11 | 0.00 | -0.17 | 0.00 | 3.37 | 14.37 | |||
| ASX | 1.87 | 0.62 | 0.21 | 0.41 | 2.27 | 5.56 | 14.50 | |||
| XYZ | 2.39 | 0.10 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.00 | 4.99 | 24.14 | |||
| WDC | 4.04 | 1.22 | 0.21 | 0.32 | 3.99 | 8.96 | 26.89 | |||
| UI | 2.25 | 0.64 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 2.11 | 4.73 | 18.99 | |||
| GRMN | 1.37 | 0.32 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 1.57 | 2.74 | 13.82 | |||
| TTWO | 1.55 | -0.21 | 0.00 | -0.38 | 0.00 | 2.77 | 11.46 | |||
| EA | 0.28 | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.21 | 0.00 | 0.58 | 2.51 | |||
| STX | 3.70 | 0.89 | 0.19 | 0.29 | 3.71 | 6.84 | 27.85 | |||
| TEAM | 3.03 | -1.05 | 0.00 | -2.67 | 0.00 | 5.08 | 15.75 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Monolithic Power Systems financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Monolithic Power Systems operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Monolithic Power Systems and related stocks such as NXP Semiconductors, ASE Industrial Holding, and Block Inc Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NXPI | -3.6 B | 390 M | -115 M | 348 M | 539 M | 1.5 B | 200 M | 2.2 B | 2.2 B | 243 M | 52 M | 1.9 B | 2.8 B | 2.8 B | 2.5 B | 2 B | 2.1 B |
| ASX | 7.9 B | 14 B | 12.9 B | 15.4 B | 24 B | 20.2 B | 21.7 B | 22.8 B | 25.7 B | 16.7 B | 26.3 B | 63.3 B | 62.9 B | 31.3 B | 33.2 B | 40.9 B | 20.6 B |
| XYZ | -85.2 M | -85.2 M | -85.2 M | -104.5 M | -154.1 M | -179.8 M | -171.6 M | -62.8 M | -38.5 M | 375.4 M | 213.1 M | 166.3 M | -540.7 M | 9.8 M | 2.9 B | 1.3 B | 1.4 B |
| WDC | 20.6 M | 1.6 B | 980 M | 1.6 B | 1.5 B | 242 M | 397 M | 675 M | -754 M | -250 M | 821 M | 1.5 B | -1.7 B | -798 M | 1.9 B | 2.1 B | 2.2 B |
| UI | 9.9 M | 102.6 M | 80.5 M | 176.9 M | 129.7 M | 213.6 M | 257.5 M | 196.3 M | 322.7 M | 380.3 M | 616.6 M | 378.7 M | 407.6 M | 350 M | 711.9 M | 818.7 M | 859.6 M |
| GRMN | 64.2 M | 520.9 M | 542.4 M | 612.4 M | 364.2 M | 456.2 M | 510.8 M | 695 M | 694.1 M | 952.5 M | 992.3 M | 1.1 B | 973.6 M | 1.3 B | 1.4 B | 1.7 B | 1.7 B |
| TTWO | -4.2 M | -108.8 M | -29.5 M | 361.6 M | -279.5 M | -8.3 M | 67.3 M | 173.5 M | 333.8 M | 404.5 M | 588.9 M | 418 M | -1.1 B | -3.7 B | -4.5 B | -4 B | -3.8 B |
| EA | 6 M | 76 M | 98 M | 8 M | 875 M | 1.2 B | 967 M | 1 B | 1 B | 3 B | 837 M | 789 M | 802 M | 1.3 B | 1.1 B | 1.3 B | 1.4 B |
| STX | 366 M | 2.9 B | 1.8 B | 1.6 B | 1.7 B | 248 M | 772 M | 1.2 B | 2 B | 1 B | 1.3 B | 1.6 B | -529 M | 335 M | 1.5 B | 1.7 B | 905 M |
| TEAM | 10.8 M | 10.8 M | 10.8 M | 19 M | 6.8 M | 4.4 M | -37.4 M | -113.4 M | -637.6 M | -350.7 M | -696.3 M | -519.5 M | -486.8 M | -300.5 M | -256.7 M | -231 M | -242.6 M |
Monolithic Power Competitive Analysis
Monolithic Power competes directly with NXP Semiconductors, ASE Industrial, and Block, and the financial data points to clear areas of divergence. On scale alone, Monolithic Power's 52.50 B valuation and 2.79 B revenue define its weight class. A 19.17% return on equity and 22.27% net margin underscore Monolithic Power's earnings capacity. Revenue tilts toward NXP Semiconductors at 12.27 B compared with 2.79 B. The market prices Monolithic Power more richly at 45.59x earnings, while ASE Industrial trades at 12.08x. On the bottom line, Monolithic Power retains 22.27% while Block manages 5.40%.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Monolithic Power Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Monolithic Power Against Peers
Monolithic Power's peer analysis compares Monolithic Power with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Monolithic Power trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Monolithic Power leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Margin comparison for Monolithic Power against peers shows where competitive advantages may be strengthening or eroding over time. EPS growth trajectory comparison for Monolithic Power versus peers focuses on structural earnings expansion rather than single-quarter surprises. The competitive landscape around Monolithic Power evolves as fundamentals shift across the peer group over time. This section is designed to make peer positioning easier to interpret at a glance. For peer comparison, Monolithic Power has a market cap of 52.5 B, P/E of 45.59, profit margin of 22.27%.
This section for Monolithic Power Systems is built from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds, with harmonization applied to align reporting definitions. Where analyst coverage exists, consensus estimates are factored in. Values may update on different source schedules.