Landstar System Competitors
| LSTR Stock | USD 148.50 -0.19 -0.13% |
Landstar System vs Powell Industries Correlation Snapshot
Very weak diversification
The correlation between LSTR and POWL is 0.48, which Macroaxis classifies as Very weak diversification for the selected horizon. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.
Moving together with Landstar Stock
Moving against Landstar Stock
The degree to which Landstar System's exhibits mean reversion depends on how efficiently the market prices new information. In highly covered equities, the mean reversion window tends to be shorter.
Landstar System Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for Landstar System matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. The useful question is whether competitors are behaving like true alternatives or simply tracking the same sector move with different volatility.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Strong stock returns do not always mean Landstar System Company is outperforming its peers on a fundamental level. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Landstar System's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGX | 3.09 | 0.71 | 0.22 | 0.58 | 2.91 | 7.30 | 23.61 | |||
| GVA | 1.19 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 1.44 | 2.36 | 7.75 | |||
| FELE | 1.35 | 0.02 | 0.00 | -0.06 | 0.00 | 2.56 | 17.51 | |||
| CSW | 2.10 | -0.30 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 4.25 | 12.83 | |||
| BCO | 1.48 | -0.12 | 0.00 | -0.17 | 0.00 | 2.91 | 18.50 | |||
| ECG | 2.97 | 0.40 | 0.12 | 1.14 | 3.64 | 5.15 | 30.95 | |||
| ALK | 2.54 | -0.24 | 0.00 | -0.19 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 16.99 | |||
| SPR | 1.19 | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.12 | 0.00 | 2.29 | 7.96 | |||
| SNDR | 1.76 | -0.17 | 0.00 | 0.32 | 0.00 | 4.21 | 14.94 | |||
| POWL | 2.66 | 0.70 | 0.22 | 0.32 | 2.55 | 7.53 | 20.36 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Landstar System financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Landstar System operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Landstar System and related stocks such as Argan Inc, Granite Construction, and Franklin Electric Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGX | 300 K | 9.3 M | 23.3 M | 40.1 M | 30.4 M | 36.3 M | 70.3 M | 72 M | 52 M | -42.9 M | 23.9 M | 38.2 M | 33.1 M | 32.4 M | 85.5 M | 98.3 M | 103.2 M |
| GVA | 15 M | 51.2 M | 45.3 M | -36.4 M | 25.3 M | 60.5 M | 57.1 M | 34.1 M | 582 K | 53.7 M | -145.1 M | 10.1 M | 83.3 M | 43.6 M | 126.3 M | 193 M | 202.7 M |
| FELE | 8.3 M | 63.1 M | 82.9 M | 82 M | 69.8 M | 72.9 M | 78.7 M | 78.2 M | 105.9 M | 95.5 M | 100.5 M | 153.9 M | 187.3 M | 193.3 M | 180.3 M | 147.1 M | 154.4 M |
| CSW | 14.2 M | 16.8 M | 21.7 M | 24.7 M | 29.7 M | 25.5 M | 11.1 M | -11.9 M | 45.6 M | 45.7 M | 66.4 M | 66.4 M | 96.4 M | 101.6 M | 136.7 M | 157.1 M | 165 M |
| BCO | 26.9 M | 74.5 M | 88.9 M | 56.8 M | -83.9 M | -11.9 M | 34.5 M | 16.7 M | -33.3 M | 29 M | 16 M | 105.2 M | 170.6 M | 87.7 M | 162.9 M | 199.7 M | 209.7 M |
| ECG | 109.4 M | 109.4 M | 109.4 M | 109.4 M | 109.4 M | 109.4 M | 109.4 M | 109.4 M | 109.4 M | 109.4 M | 109.4 M | 109.4 M | 124.8 M | 137.2 M | 143.4 M | 201.8 M | 157.7 M |
| ALK | 25.9 M | 244.5 M | 316 M | 508 M | 605 M | 848 M | 797 M | 960 M | 437 M | 769 M | -1.3 B | 478 M | 58 M | 235 M | 395 M | 100 M | 159.8 M |
| SNDR | 95.5 M | 95.5 M | 95.5 M | 95.5 M | 133.6 M | 140.9 M | 156.9 M | 389.9 M | 268.9 M | 147 M | 211.7 M | 405.4 M | 457.8 M | 238.5 M | 117 M | 103.6 M | 98.4 M |
| POWL | -2.6 M | 29.7 M | 42.1 M | 29.2 M | 9.4 M | 15.5 M | -9.5 M | -7.2 M | 9.9 M | 16.7 M | 631 K | 13.7 M | 54.5 M | 149.8 M | 180.7 M | 207.9 M | 218.3 M |
Landstar System Competitive Analysis
Placing Landstar System next to Argan, Granite Construction, and Franklin Electric puts raw numbers into competitive context. A 5.09 B valuation paired with 4.74 B in revenue sets the baseline. Profitability stands at a 2.42% net margin with return on equity reaching 13.01%. Landstar System pulls in 4.74 B in revenue while Argan reports 874.2 M. On the bottom line, Granite Construction retains 4.36% while Landstar System manages 2.42%. Landstar System dwarfs Franklin Electric on market cap at 5.09 B versus 4.07 B.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Landstar System Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Landstar System Against Peers
Landstar System's peer analysis compares Landstar System with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Landstar System trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Landstar System leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
EPS growth trajectory comparison for Landstar System versus peers cuts through one-quarter earnings surprises and focuses on structural earnings expansion across periods. Competition analysis adds context to price action by grounding it in relative fundamentals. For peer comparison, Landstar System has a market cap of 5.09 B, P/E of 28.66, profit margin of 2.42%.
Unless otherwise specified, data for Landstar System is compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Professional analyst research is incorporated when coverage is available. Updates may occur throughout the day.