Landstar System Competitors

LSTR Stock  USD 148.50  -0.19  -0.13%   
The company is classified under the Ground Transportation sector. Landstar System operates alongside Argan, Granite Construction, Franklin Electric, CSW Industrials, and Brinks and other firms in the same space. Peer context helps frame relative positioning. Landstar System is positioned against peers on valuation, growth, and risk to highlight relative strength.

Landstar System vs Powell Industries Correlation Snapshot

Very weak diversification
The correlation between LSTR and POWL is 0.48, which Macroaxis classifies as Very weak diversification for the selected horizon. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.

Moving together with Landstar Stock

  0.61RXO RXO IncPairCorr

Moving against Landstar Stock

  0.47YGMZ Mingzhu LogisticsPairCorr
  0.45NTNX Nutanix Tech BoostPairCorr
  0.4HXHX Haoxin HoldingsPairCorr
  0.33BTOC Armlogi Holding CorpPairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
The degree to which Landstar System's exhibits mean reversion depends on how efficiently the market prices new information. In highly covered equities, the mean reversion window tends to be shorter.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
145.47148.50151.53
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
133.65169.07172.10
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
136.82139.85142.87
Details
Analyst
Consensus
LowTargetHigh
137.65151.27167.91
Details
Before investing in Landstar System, assess how Landstar System's compares to its competitive peer group. A company that appears undervalued in absolute terms may be fairly priced when measured against sector-relative benchmarks.

Landstar System Competition Correlation Matrix

Competition correlation for Landstar System matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. The useful question is whether competitors are behaving like true alternatives or simply tracking the same sector move with different volatility.

High positive correlations

ECGAGX
POWLGVA
ALKBCO
SNDRBCO
POWLAGX
GVAAGX
  

High negative correlations

SPRGVA
SPRAGX
SPRECG
POWLSPR
CSWAGX
ECGCSW

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

Strong stock returns do not always mean Landstar System Company is outperforming its peers on a fundamental level. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Landstar System's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.

Peer Comparison: Net Income

Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Landstar System financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Landstar System operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.
Compare Landstar System and related stocks such as Argan Inc, Granite Construction, and Franklin Electric Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental
Price To Sales RatioDividend Yield
Ptb RatioDays Sales Outstanding
Book Value Per ShareFree Cash Flow Yield
Invested CapitalOperating Cash Flow Per Share
Average PayablesStock Based Compensation To Revenue
Capex To DepreciationPb Ratio
Ev To SalesFree Cash Flow Per Share
RoicInventory Turnover
Net Income Per ShareDays Of Inventory On Hand
Payables TurnoverSales General And Administrative To Revenue
Average InventoryResearch And Ddevelopement To Revenue
Capex To RevenueCash Per Share
PocfratioInterest Coverage
Payout RatioCapex To Operating Cash Flow
Pfcf RatioDays Payables Outstanding
Net Current Asset ValueIncome Quality
RoeTangible Asset Value
Ev To Operating Cash FlowPe Ratio
Return On Tangible AssetsEv To Free Cash Flow
Earnings YieldIntangibles To Total Assets
Net Debt To E B I T D ACurrent Ratio
Tangible Book Value Per ShareReceivables Turnover
Graham NumberShareholders Equity Per Share
Debt To EquityCapex Per Share
Graham Net NetAverage Receivables
Revenue Per ShareInterest Debt Per Share
Debt To AssetsEnterprise Value Over E B I T D A
Short Term Coverage RatiosPrice Earnings Ratio
Operating CyclePrice Book Value Ratio
Price Earnings To Growth RatioDays Of Payables Outstanding
Dividend Payout RatioPrice To Operating Cash Flows Ratio
Price To Free Cash Flows RatioPretax Profit Margin
Ebt Per EbitOperating Profit Margin
Effective Tax RateCompany Equity Multiplier
Long Term Debt To CapitalizationTotal Debt To Capitalization
Return On Capital EmployedDebt Equity Ratio
Ebit Per RevenueQuick Ratio
Dividend Paid And Capex Coverage RatioNet Income Per E B T
Cash RatioCash Conversion Cycle
Operating Cash Flow Sales RatioDays Of Inventory Outstanding
Days Of Sales OutstandingFree Cash Flow Operating Cash Flow Ratio
Cash Flow Coverage RatiosPrice To Book Ratio
Fixed Asset TurnoverCapital Expenditure Coverage Ratio
Price Cash Flow RatioEnterprise Value Multiple
Debt RatioCash Flow To Debt Ratio
Price Sales RatioReturn On Assets
Asset TurnoverNet Profit Margin
Gross Profit MarginPrice Fair Value
Return On Equity
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023202420252026
AGX300 K9.3 M23.3 M40.1 M30.4 M36.3 M70.3 M72 M52 M-42.9 M23.9 M38.2 M33.1 M32.4 M85.5 M98.3 M103.2 M
GVA15 M51.2 M45.3 M-36.4 M25.3 M60.5 M57.1 M34.1 M582 K53.7 M-145.1 M10.1 M83.3 M43.6 M126.3 M193 M202.7 M
FELE8.3 M63.1 M82.9 M82 M69.8 M72.9 M78.7 M78.2 M105.9 M95.5 M100.5 M153.9 M187.3 M193.3 M180.3 M147.1 M154.4 M
CSW14.2 M16.8 M21.7 M24.7 M29.7 M25.5 M11.1 M-11.9 M45.6 M45.7 M66.4 M66.4 M96.4 M101.6 M136.7 M157.1 M165 M
BCO26.9 M74.5 M88.9 M56.8 M-83.9 M-11.9 M34.5 M16.7 M-33.3 M29 M16 M105.2 M170.6 M87.7 M162.9 M199.7 M209.7 M
ECG109.4 M109.4 M109.4 M109.4 M109.4 M109.4 M109.4 M109.4 M109.4 M109.4 M109.4 M109.4 M124.8 M137.2 M143.4 M201.8 M157.7 M
ALK25.9 M244.5 M316 M508 M605 M848 M797 M960 M437 M769 M-1.3 B478 M58 M235 M395 M100 M159.8 M
SNDR95.5 M95.5 M95.5 M95.5 M133.6 M140.9 M156.9 M389.9 M268.9 M147 M211.7 M405.4 M457.8 M238.5 M117 M103.6 M98.4 M
POWL-2.6 M29.7 M42.1 M29.2 M9.4 M15.5 M-9.5 M-7.2 M9.9 M16.7 M631 K13.7 M54.5 M149.8 M180.7 M207.9 M218.3 M

Landstar System Competitive Analysis

Placing Landstar System next to Argan, Granite Construction, and Franklin Electric puts raw numbers into competitive context. A 5.09 B valuation paired with 4.74 B in revenue sets the baseline. Profitability stands at a 2.42% net margin with return on equity reaching 13.01%. Landstar System pulls in 4.74 B in revenue while Argan reports 874.2 M. On the bottom line, Granite Construction retains 4.36% while Landstar System manages 2.42%. Landstar System dwarfs Franklin Electric on market cap at 5.09 B versus 4.07 B.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
LSTR AGX GVA FELE CSW BCO ECG ALK SPR SNDR
 0.13 
148.50
Landstar
 0.01 
469.84
Argan
 0.06 
121.51
Granite
 0.02 
91.35
Franklin
 1.92 
255.25
CSW
 3.97 
101.23
Brinks
 1.40 
116.15
Everus
 0.03 
37.87
Alaska
 0.92 
39.50
Spirit
 0.71 
24.06
Schneider
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Current Ratio
Net Asset
Profit Margin
EBITDA
Operating Margin
Current Valuation
Price To Book
Retained Earnings
Current Asset
Five Year Return
Beta
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Cash Flow From Operations
Annual Yield
Total Debt
Return On Equity
Return On Asset
Number Of Shares Shorted
Book Value Per Share
Current Liabilities
Total Asset
Debt To Equity
Short Ratio
Target Price
Last Dividend Paid
Shares Owned By Institutions
Market Capitalization
Price To Earning
Price To Earnings To Growth
Price To Sales
Net Income
Earnings Per Share
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue
Working Capital
Cash And Equivalents
Cash Per Share
Gross Profit
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Landstar System Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze Landstar System Against Peers

Landstar System's peer analysis compares Landstar System with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Landstar System trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where Landstar System leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

EPS growth trajectory comparison for Landstar System versus peers cuts through one-quarter earnings surprises and focuses on structural earnings expansion across periods. Competition analysis adds context to price action by grounding it in relative fundamentals. For peer comparison, Landstar System has a market cap of 5.09 B, P/E of 28.66, profit margin of 2.42%.

Unless otherwise specified, data for Landstar System is compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Professional analyst research is incorporated when coverage is available. Updates may occur throughout the day.

This content is curated and reviewed by:

Raphi Shpitalnik - Junior Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board
Last reviewed on March 2nd, 2026