FSK Competitors
| FSK Stock | USD 10.09 -0.15 -1.46% |
Pair Correlation for FS KKR and Prospect Capital Overview
Very good diversification
The correlation between FSK and PSEC is -0.36, which Macroaxis classifies as Very good diversification for the selected horizon. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
Moving together with FSK Stock
Moving against FSK Stock
Mean reversion in FS KKR is more reliable over longer time horizons. Short-term deviations can persist and even widen before correcting, making position sizing and risk management critical.
FS KKR Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between FS KKR Capital and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between FSK Stock performing well and FS KKR Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze FS KKR's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCPC | 1.82 | -0.66 | 0.00 | -0.91 | 0.00 | 2.71 | 16.50 | |||
| TPVG | 1.37 | -0.33 | 0.00 | -0.64 | 0.00 | 1.71 | 9.03 | |||
| TSLX | 1.19 | -0.28 | 0.00 | -0.56 | 0.00 | 2.13 | 8.19 | |||
| GBDC | 0.98 | -0.16 | 0.00 | -0.34 | 0.00 | 2.02 | 7.64 | |||
| NMFC | 1.13 | -0.25 | 0.00 | -0.84 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 9.06 | |||
| CGBD | 1.13 | -0.20 | 0.00 | -0.34 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 7.45 | |||
| HTGC | 1.29 | -0.37 | 0.00 | -0.52 | 0.00 | 2.59 | 11.40 | |||
| TRIN | 1.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 1.12 | 2.49 | 5.89 | |||
| ARCC | 1.00 | -0.13 | 0.00 | -0.19 | 0.00 | 2.26 | 6.94 | |||
| MAIN | 1.19 | -0.11 | 0.00 | -0.17 | 0.00 | 2.59 | 6.68 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in FS KKR Capital financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of FS KKR Capital operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare FS KKR Capital and related stocks such as BlackRock TCP Capital, Triplepoint Venture, and Sixth Street Specialty Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TCPC | 54.1 M | 6.7 M | 27.5 M | 63.4 M | 50 M | 58.1 M | 95.4 M | 90.6 M | 45.5 M | 30.6 M | 71.4 M | 133.8 M | -9.2 M | 38.5 M | -63.1 M | -88.9 M | -84.5 M |
| TPVG | 17.1 M | 17.1 M | 17.1 M | 17.1 M | 17.1 M | 15.5 M | 11.1 M | 19.2 M | 36.6 M | 31.8 M | 35.3 M | 76.6 M | -20.1 M | -39.8 M | 32 M | 49.2 M | 51.7 M |
| TSLX | 813 K | 813 K | 39.6 M | 67 M | 85 M | 63.6 M | 137 M | 111.6 M | 119 M | 154.6 M | 178.1 M | 211.8 M | 108.1 M | 222 M | 186.6 M | 170.5 M | 136.1 M |
| GBDC | 59 K | 31.8 M | 46.5 M | 65.4 M | 70.8 M | 69.2 M | 82.3 M | 82 M | -18.6 M | 54.9 M | 340.3 M | 153.4 M | 258.6 M | 273.8 M | 376.6 M | 433.1 M | 454.8 M |
| NMFC | -1.2 M | 31.7 M | 31.8 M | 61.9 M | 45.6 M | 33 M | 111.7 M | 109.4 M | 72.4 M | 112.6 M | 58.5 M | 201.4 M | 74.7 M | 135.3 M | 113.4 M | 16.5 M | 15.7 M |
| CGBD | -1.9 M | -1.9 M | -1.9 M | -1.9 M | 5.6 M | 18.7 M | 69.8 M | 84.2 M | 39.1 M | 61.3 M | 6.8 M | 160.4 M | 85.6 M | 92.3 M | 89 M | 70 M | 66.1 M |
| HTGC | -2 M | 46.9 M | 46.8 M | 99.4 M | 71.2 M | 42.9 M | 68.7 M | 79 M | 76.5 M | 173.6 M | 227.3 M | 174.2 M | 102.1 M | 337.5 M | 263 M | 339.7 M | 356.7 M |
| TRIN | -524 K | -524 K | -524 K | -524 K | -524 K | -524 K | -524 K | -524 K | -524 K | -524 K | -6.1 M | 132.3 M | -30.4 M | 76.9 M | 115.6 M | 135.6 M | 142.4 M |
| ARCC | 3.3 M | 319.5 M | 508.2 M | 488.5 M | 591 M | 379 M | 474 M | 667 M | 858 M | 793 M | 484 M | 1.6 B | 600 M | 1.3 B | 1.5 B | 1.3 B | 1.4 B |
| MAIN | 7.9 M | 63 M | 104.4 M | 96.9 M | 100.7 M | 104.4 M | 138.9 M | 170.6 M | 168.2 M | 129.6 M | 29.4 M | 330.8 M | 241.6 M | 428.4 M | 508.1 M | 493.4 M | 518.1 M |
| CSWC | 52.8 M | 93 M | 107.8 M | 112 M | 53.4 M | -5.4 M | 23.5 M | 39.3 M | 33.1 M | -22.4 M | 50.9 M | 42.8 M | 33.1 M | 83.4 M | 70.5 M | 81.1 M | 85.2 M |
| ECC | 8.3 M | 8.3 M | 8.3 M | 8.3 M | 8.3 M | -41 M | 91 M | 31.1 M | -54.8 M | -8.7 M | 60.9 M | 131.9 M | -101.8 M | 118.8 M | 80.3 M | -134.4 M | -127.7 M |
| PFLT | 12 M | 12 M | 12 M | 20.5 M | 12.5 M | 33.5 M | 36.3 M | 33.5 M | -11.1 M | 18.4 M | 56.5 M | 3.5 M | 39.3 M | 91.8 M | 66.4 M | 76.3 M | 80.1 M |
| PSEC | 8.8 M | 190.9 M | 220.9 M | 319 M | 346.3 M | 103.4 M | 252.9 M | 299.9 M | 144.5 M | -16.2 M | 963.8 M | 582.6 M | -101.6 M | 262.8 M | -469.9 M | -540.4 M | -513.4 M |
FS KKR Competitive Analysis
How does FS KKR measure up against BlackRock TCP, Triplepoint Venture, and Sixth Street? The financials tell a nuanced story. FS KKR operates at a 2.83 B scale with 1.17 B flowing through the income statement. A 0.18% return on equity and 0.72% net margin underscore FS KKR's earnings capacity. FS KKR leads with 0.18% return on equity versus -12.86% for BlackRock TCP. Net profitability gives Triplepoint Venture an edge at 54.46% versus FS KKR at 0.72%. Top-line revenue favors FS KKR by a wide margin: 1.17 B to 360.2 M.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze FS KKR Against Peers
FS KKR's peer analysis compares FS KKR with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether FS KKR trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where FS KKR leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.