OneSpan Net Income vs. Price To Earning
| OSPN Stock | USD 10.41 -0.04 -0.38% |
Net Income | First Reported 2000-03-31 | Previous Quarter 6.5 M | Current Value 43.5 M | Quarterly Volatility 7.8 M |
Macro event markers
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.53 | 0.7069 |
|
|
The profitability profile for OneSpan reflects how income compares to revenue, assets, and capital. Values reflect publicly available financial data. Figures reflect how income relates to operational and balance sheet components. The dataset represents available financial disclosures.
Revenue by Earning Segment
Revenue for OneSpan breaks down into 4 product-level segments. At 38.55 Million, Subscription is OneSpan's largest segment (61.3%), with Hardware Products as the second-largest at 14.3 Million. A single segment driving over 60% of revenue suggests limited product diversification, which can amplify both upside and downside.
Your Equity Center.
Macro event markers
Earnings Segment Revenue Breakdown for OneSpan Snapshot
This chart illustrates OneSpan's revenue composition by product line based on the latest available data. At 1.3%, Professional Services and Other is the narrowest segment in OneSpan's product mix.
Consensus earnings data provides a reference point for evaluating OneSpan over time. These figures serve as informational inputs within a broader research framework.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.574 | Dividend Share 0.49 | Earnings Share 1.88 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.029 |
Understanding OneSpan includes distinguishing between market value and book value, where book value reflects OneSpan's accounting equity. OneSpan's market capitalization is 397.38 M. At P/B 1.43, OneSpan trades moderately above book value. Enterprise value stands at 323.42 M. Intrinsic value reflects what OneSpan's fundamentals imply about worth, which may differ from both price and book figure.
OneSpan intrinsic value attempts to capture underlying worth, separate from current trading levels. For OneSpan, key inputs include a P/E ratio of 574.22, a P/B ratio of 1.43, a profit margin of 29.98%, and ROE of 30.1%.
OneSpan Price To Earning vs. Net Income Fundamental Analysis
Cross-company financial ratios help determine OneSpan's valuation standing. OneSpan takes the leading position in net income compared to key competitors. It also takes the leading position in price to earning compared to key competitors . The spread between Net Income and Price To Earning for OneSpan sits at 126,962 . According to the latest estimates, Net Income is gaining momentum with a magnitude of about 4.76%. Year-ago financials show OneSpan with Net Income of 72.9 Million. Multiples-driven valuation aligns OneSpan with peer performance.OneSpan Price To Earning vs. Net Income
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
OneSpan |
| = | 72.9 M |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Price to Earnings ratio is typically used for current valuation of a company and is one of the most popular ratios that investors monitor daily. Holding a low PE stock is less risky because when a company's profitability falls, it is likely that earnings will also go down. In other words, if you start from a lower position, your downside risk is limited. There are also some investors who believe that low Price to Earnings ratio reflects the low pricing because a given company is in trouble. On the other hand, a higher PE ratio means that investors are paying more for each unit of profit.
OneSpan |
| = | 574.22 X |
Generally speaking, the Price to Earnings ratio gives investors an idea of what the market is willing to pay for the company's current earnings.
OneSpan Price To Earning Comparison
OneSpan is currently under evaluation in price to earning compared to key competitors.
OneSpan Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in OneSpan, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, OneSpan will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of OneSpan's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of OneSpan, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | End Of Year Estimate | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -6.1 M | -5.8 M | |
| Operating Income | 50.1 M | 52.6 M | |
| Income Before Tax | 49.4 M | 51.8 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -712 K | -676.4 K | |
| Net Income | 72.9 M | 76.5 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | -23.5 M | -22.4 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 51.4 M | 53.9 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 72.9 M | 76.5 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | -17.2 K | -16.4 K | |
| Interest Income | 2 M | 2.6 M | |
| Net Interest Income | 2 M | 1.2 M | |
| Change To Netincome | -596.9 K | -567 K | |
| Net Income Per Share | 1.92 | 2.02 | |
| Income Quality | 0.82 | 0.92 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 1.48 | 0.98 |
OneSpan Profitability Driver Comparison
The profitability drivers of OneSpan are among the most important inputs for investors evaluating its long-term potential. A wide range of unpredictable external events can affect earnings and create sudden volatility in OneSpan's market value and investment attractiveness.
Earnings Estimation Breakdown
Analyst consensus for OneSpan places the projected EPS at 0.335 for the upcoming period. This estimate is bounded by a low of 0.3 and a high of 0.37 across all analyst models covering OneSpan. Trailing twelve-month reporting data forms the basis of this projection, with non-recurring items excluded from the calculation.Last Reported EPS
0.30 Lowest | Expected EPS | 0.37 Highest |
Earnings Projection Consensus
Valuation signals derived from OneSpan's consensus EPS estimate versus market price offer a directional view of relative attractiveness. A positive gap may indicate room for repricing toward the estimate; a negative gap may suggest the market has already priced in growth fully. These scenarios should be reviewed within the context of earnings quality, sector dynamics, and macroeconomic conditions.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 4 | 49.81% | 0.36 | 0.335 | 1.88 |
Earnings History
Analyst earnings forecasts for OneSpan are built from detailed financial models and direct company interaction through earnings calls and investor days. When actual EPS aligns with or exceeds consensus, it generally reinforces positive market sentiment. We recommend pairing this consensus view with peer comparisons and historical EPS accuracy data.OneSpan Quarterly Gross Profit | 38.84 Million |
The mean reversion framework for OneSpan is built on the premise that markets are not perfectly efficient and that prices periodically overshoot their intrinsic value in both directions.
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual EPS for OneSpan is reported directly from its income statement at each quarterly disclosure event. Analyst-projected EPS for OneSpan represents the consensus expectation for what OneSpan will earn in future quarters. A rising EPS trend generally signals improving profitability; the weighted average adjusts for changes in share count through the period.Estimated Months Earnings per Share
EPS is a cornerstone metric for income-focused investors in OneSpan, offering a direct read on per-share profitability and dividend coverage capacity. A growing EPS trajectory suggests the company is better positioned to sustain and increase distributions over time. Investors should always evaluate OneSpan's EPS relative to peers and in combination with cash flow and balance sheet data.Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Analysts spend considerable effort projecting OneSpan's quarterly EPS using management guidance, industry data, and financial models. When results deviate materially from these projections, markets reprice quickly and decisively. Understanding the surprise history gives investors a data-driven framework for setting expectations around upcoming reporting events.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-03-11 | 2025-12-31 | 0.348 | 0.36 | 0.012 | 3 | ||
2025-10-30 | 2025-09-30 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 13 | ||
2025-07-30 | 2025-06-30 | 0.2925 | 0.34 | 0.0475 | 16 | ||
2025-04-30 | 2025-03-31 | 0.17 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 164 | ||
2025-03-04 | 2024-12-31 | 0.26 | 0.24 | -0.02 | 7 | ||
2024-10-30 | 2024-09-30 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 0.14 | 73 | ||
2024-08-01 | 2024-06-30 | 0.16 | 0.31 | 0.15 | 93 | ||
2024-05-02 | 2024-03-31 | 0.17 | 0.43 | 0.26 | 152 | ||
2024-03-06 | 2023-12-31 | 0.03 | 0.19 | 0.16 | 533 | ||
2023-11-08 | 2023-09-30 | -0.04 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 325 | ||
2023-08-09 | 2023-06-30 | -0.05 | -0.18 | -0.13 | 260 | ||
2023-05-04 | 2023-03-31 | -0.05 | -0.09 | -0.04 | 80 | ||
2023-02-28 | 2022-12-31 | -0.07 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 142 | ||
2022-11-01 | 2022-09-30 | -0.1 | 0.03 | 0.13 | 130 | ||
2022-08-02 | 2022-06-30 | -0.09 | -0.1 | -0.01 | 11 | ||
2022-05-03 | 2022-03-31 | -0.05 | -0.01 | 0.04 | 80 | ||
2022-02-22 | 2021-12-31 | -0.08 | -0.24 | -0.16 | 200 | ||
2021-11-02 | 2021-09-30 | -0.13 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 123 | ||
2021-08-04 | 2021-06-30 | -0.04 | -0.04 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2021-05-04 | 2021-03-31 | -0.08 | -0.16 | -0.08 | 100 | ||
2021-02-23 | 2020-12-31 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 200 | ||
2020-11-02 | 2020-09-30 | 0.05 | 0.03 | -0.02 | 40 | ||
2020-08-11 | 2020-06-30 | 0.04 | 0.02 | -0.02 | 50 | ||
2020-05-05 | 2020-03-31 | -0.03 | 0.08 | 0.11 | 366 | ||
2020-03-03 | 2019-12-31 | 0.17 | 0.24 | 0.07 | 41 | ||
2019-10-29 | 2019-09-30 | 0.15 | 0.36 | 0.21 | 140 | ||
2019-07-25 | 2019-06-30 | 0.05 | 0.01 | -0.04 | 80 | ||
2019-05-07 | 2019-03-31 | 0.04 | -0.07 | -0.11 | 275 | ||
2019-02-19 | 2018-12-31 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.11 | 183 | ||
2018-10-30 | 2018-09-30 | 0.08 | 0.04 | -0.04 | 50 | ||
2018-07-26 | 2018-06-30 | 0.085 | 0.01 | -0.075 | 88 | ||
2018-05-08 | 2018-03-31 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 300 | ||
2018-02-21 | 2017-12-31 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 20 | ||
2017-10-26 | 2017-09-30 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 250 | ||
2017-07-27 | 2017-06-30 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 500 | ||
2017-04-27 | 2017-03-31 | -0.03 | 0.01 | 0.04 | 133 | ||
2017-02-14 | 2016-12-31 | 0.02 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 550 | ||
2016-10-27 | 2016-09-30 | 0.03 | 0.01 | -0.02 | 66 | ||
2016-07-28 | 2016-06-30 | 0.08 | 0.07 | -0.01 | 12 | ||
2016-04-28 | 2016-03-31 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2016-02-16 | 2015-12-31 | 0.17 | 0.09 | -0.08 | 47 | ||
2015-10-27 | 2015-09-30 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.05 | 21 | ||
2015-07-28 | 2015-06-30 | 0.28 | 0.35 | 0.07 | 25 | ||
2015-04-28 | 2015-03-31 | 0.21 | 0.34 | 0.13 | 61 | ||
2015-02-17 | 2014-12-31 | 0.2 | 0.28 | 0.08 | 40 | ||
2014-10-28 | 2014-09-30 | 0.1 | 0.28 | 0.18 | 180 | ||
2014-07-24 | 2014-06-30 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.08 | 88 | ||
2014-04-24 | 2014-03-31 | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.05 | 125 | ||
2014-02-18 | 2013-12-31 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.03 | 50 | ||
2013-10-24 | 2013-09-30 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2013-07-25 | 2013-06-30 | 0.12 | 0.05 | -0.07 | 58 | ||
2013-04-25 | 2013-03-31 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.01 | 20 | ||
2013-02-21 | 2012-12-31 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2012-10-25 | 2012-09-30 | 0.05 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 140 | ||
2012-07-26 | 2012-06-30 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 58 | ||
2012-04-26 | 2012-03-31 | 0.09 | 0.05 | -0.04 | 44 | ||
2012-02-16 | 2011-12-31 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 0.16 | 123 | ||
2011-10-27 | 2011-09-30 | 0.06 | 0.15 | 0.09 | 150 | ||
2011-07-26 | 2011-06-30 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2011-04-26 | 2011-03-31 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2011-02-17 | 2010-12-31 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 0.09 | 112 | ||
2010-10-26 | 2010-09-30 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 100 | ||
2010-07-27 | 2010-06-30 | 0.04 | 0.03 | -0.01 | 25 | ||
2010-04-27 | 2010-03-31 | 0.05 | 0.01 | -0.04 | 80 | ||
2010-02-18 | 2009-12-31 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 114 | ||
2009-10-27 | 2009-09-30 | 0.05 | 0.04 | -0.01 | 20 | ||
2009-07-23 | 2009-06-30 | 0.08 | 0.05 | -0.03 | 37 | ||
2009-04-23 | 2009-03-31 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 80 | ||
2009-02-19 | 2008-12-31 | 0.09 | 0.07 | -0.02 | 22 | ||
2008-10-23 | 2008-09-30 | 0.16 | 0.24 | 0.08 | 50 | ||
2008-07-24 | 2008-06-30 | 0.14 | 0.2 | 0.06 | 42 | ||
2008-04-24 | 2008-03-31 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2008-02-21 | 2007-12-31 | 0.2 | 0.09 | -0.11 | 55 | ||
2007-10-25 | 2007-09-30 | 0.17 | 0.15 | -0.02 | 11 | ||
2007-07-26 | 2007-06-30 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 20 | ||
2007-04-26 | 2007-03-31 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 18 | ||
2007-02-20 | 2006-12-31 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 18 | ||
2006-10-26 | 2006-09-30 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 28 | ||
2006-07-27 | 2006-06-30 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 33 | ||
2006-04-27 | 2006-03-31 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2006-02-21 | 2005-12-31 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 33 | ||
2005-10-27 | 2005-09-30 | 0.04 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 25 | ||
2005-07-20 | 2005-06-30 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-04-21 | 2005-03-31 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 33 | ||
2005-02-15 | 2004-12-31 | 0.02 | 0.01 | -0.01 | 50 | ||
2004-10-21 | 2004-09-30 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 50 | ||
2004-07-22 | 2004-06-30 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 50 | ||
2004-04-22 | 2004-03-31 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 100 | ||
2003-02-18 | 2002-12-31 | -0.02 | -0.07 | -0.05 | 250 | ||
2002-02-20 | 2001-12-31 | -0.11 | -0.07 | 0.04 | 36 | ||
2001-10-24 | 2001-09-30 | -0.06 | -0.14 | -0.08 | 133 | ||
2001-07-25 | 2001-06-30 | -0.04 | -0.06 | -0.02 | 50 |
Use OneSpan in pair-trading
A pair strategy built around OneSpan is useful when investors want to reduce directional market exposure while still expressing a relative-value idea. This framework is most useful when investors want to hedge directional moves caused by sector headlines or broad market pressure.
OneSpan Pair Trading
OneSpan Pair Trading Analysis
Understanding the correlation structure around OneSpan helps portfolio managers make better tax-loss harvesting decisions. A highly correlated substitute for OneSpan ensures that the portfolio's expected return and risk profile remain largely intact through the wash-sale.
Investors use the correlation of OneSpan to identify pairs-trading opportunities. When two historically correlated assets diverge temporarily, a long/short position combining OneSpan with the diverging counterpart can generate returns with minimal net market exposure.
OneSpan's hedging context can be framed through Correlation analysis and pair-based evaluation. Sector-level and cross-sector pair comparisons both contribute to hedging context. Hedging context is most informative when correlation patterns for OneSpan are stable. All data reflects available market observations.Use Investing Themes to Complement your OneSpan position
OneSpan operates in Technology/Software—Infrastructure at 397.38 Million market cap - a thematic view expands this smaller-cap position into a broader portfolio concept. OneSpan smaller-cap scale (397.38 Million) within Software—Infrastructure helps compare substitutes, complements, and diversifiers that strengthen the overall Technology allocation.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Exotic Funds Thematic Idea Now
Exotic Funds
Funds or Etfs with high minimum investment requirement that manage portfolios of alternative investments such as hedge funds, options, futures, real estate or commodities. The Exotic Funds theme has 46 constituents at this time.
Investors can hold the Exotic Funds Theme as a long-term basket or actively trade individual constituents to capture short-term price movement.
| View All Next | Launch |