Ford Net Income vs. Return On Asset
| F Stock | USD 12.32 0.13 1.07% |
Net Loss | First Reported 1985-09-30 | Previous Quarter 2.4 B | Current Value -11.1 B | Quarterly Volatility 2.8 B |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.18 | 0.1218 |
|
|
Profitability metrics here describe how Ford converts revenue and assets into earnings and performance context.
Investing Opportunities. Quarterly Earnings Growth 1.727 | Dividend Share 0.6 | Earnings Share -2.06 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth -0.05 |
The market value of Ford Motor is measured differently than book value, which reflects Ford accounting equity. Intrinsic value is an analytical estimate of Ford's underlying worth that can differ from price and book value. Prices respond to market conditions and behavior, which can widen gaps versus fundamentals. Valuation methods help interpret those gaps.
Note that Ford's intrinsic value and market price are different measures derived from different inputs. A full view may include fundamental ratios, momentum patterns, industry dynamics, and analyst estimates. Market price reflects the current exchange level formed by active bids and offers.
Ford Motor Return On Asset vs. Net Income Fundamental Analysis
Peer multiple analysis evaluates Ford's pricing efficiency within its industry. Ford Motor is rated below average. in net income category among its top compatitors. It also is rated below average. in return on asset category among its top compatitors . Net Loss is dropping compared to historical levels. Ford reported -8.18 Billion in Net Loss for the previous period. Comparative pricing ratios position Ford within industry norms.Ford's Historical Earnings Breakdown by Geography
Ford Return On Asset vs. Net Income
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Ford |
| = | -8.16 B |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Return on Asset or ROA shows how effective is the management of the company in generating income from utilizing all of the assets at their disposal. It is a useful ratio to evaluate the performance of different departments of a company as well as to understand management performance over time.
Ford |
| = | -0.0013 |
Return on Asset measures overall efficiency of a company in generating profits from its total assets. It is expressed as the percentage of profits earned per dollar of Asset. A low ROA typically means that a company is asset-intensive and therefore will needs more money to continue generating revenue in the future.
Ford Return On Asset Comparison
Ford is currently under evaluation. in return on asset category among its top compatitors.
Ford Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Ford, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Ford will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Ford's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Ford, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -7.7 B | -8.1 B | |
| Operating Income | 2.5 B | 2.4 B | |
| Income Before Tax | -11.8 B | -11.2 B | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -14.4 B | -13.6 B | |
| Net Loss | -8.2 B | -7.8 B | |
| Income Tax Expense | -3.7 B | -3.5 B | |
| Net Loss | -8.2 B | -7.8 B | |
| Net Loss | -8.2 B | -7.8 B | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | -9.2 B | -8.8 B | |
| Interest Income | 1.5 B | 1.3 B | |
| Net Interest Income | 157 M | 164.8 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 8.9 B | 9.4 B | |
| Net Loss | -2.06 | -1.95 | |
| Income Quality | -2.61 | -2.48 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.69 | 0.66 |
Ford Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers for Ford are the financial and operational factors that most directly influence its earnings. Investors must contend with a wide range of external shocks - from regulatory changes to commodity price swings - that can disrupt Ford's financial results.
Ford Earnings Estimation Breakdown
For Ford Motor, the next projected earnings per share is 0.2713 based on current analyst consensus. The range of individual analyst forecasts runs from 0.01 to 0.32, reflecting varying views on Ford's near-term business performance. Consensus EPS excludes non-recurring items and is calculated from trailing twelve-month operating results.Last Reported EPS
0.01 Lowest | Expected EPS | 0.32 Highest |
Ford Earnings Projection Consensus
If consensus earnings estimates imply a fair value above Ford's current price, the market may be discounting future earnings more aggressively than analysts. If the market price is ahead of the estimate, the implied premium may require strong execution to sustain. These valuation signals are best used as one input within a multi-method investment framework.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 22 | 73.5% | 0.13 | 0.2713 | -2.06 |
Ford Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
For Ford, actual EPS provides a historical record of per-share profitability that investors use to identify trends. Expected EPS for Ford Motor projects this figure forward using guidance, industry dynamics, and financial analysis. The higher Ford's EPS trajectory, the stronger its implied earnings quality relative to peers.Ford Estimated Months Earnings per Share
Investors seeking income from Ford should track EPS trends alongside dividend history to assess payout sustainability. EPS that outpaces dividend growth signals expanding coverage; EPS that lags dividend growth raises cut risk. Always complement EPS analysis with a review of operating leverage, working capital trends, and competitive positioning.Ford Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
EPS surprise events for Ford's have historically correlated with short-term return outliers - both upside and downside. The post-earnings drift effect means that initial surprise reactions can persist over subsequent trading sessions. Analyst estimates contributing to consensus are derived from fundamental models trained on trailing performance and management guidance.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-02-03 | 2025-12-31 | 0.1155 | 0.13 | 0.0145 | 12 | ||
2025-10-23 | 2025-09-30 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.1 | 28 | ||
2025-07-30 | 2025-06-30 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.05 | 15 | ||
2025-05-05 | 2025-03-31 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 366 | ||
2025-02-05 | 2024-12-31 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 0.07 | 21 | ||
2024-10-28 | 2024-09-30 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2024-07-24 | 2024-06-30 | 0.68 | 0.47 | -0.21 | 30 | ||
2024-04-24 | 2024-03-31 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.07 | 16 | ||
2024-02-06 | 2023-12-31 | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.15 | 107 | ||
2023-10-26 | 2023-09-30 | 0.45 | 0.39 | -0.06 | 13 | ||
2023-07-27 | 2023-06-30 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.17 | 30 | ||
2023-05-02 | 2023-03-31 | 0.41 | 0.63 | 0.22 | 53 | ||
2023-02-02 | 2022-12-31 | 0.62 | 0.51 | -0.11 | 17 | ||
2022-10-26 | 2022-09-30 | 0.27 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 11 | ||
2022-07-27 | 2022-06-30 | 0.45 | 0.68 | 0.23 | 51 | ||
2022-04-27 | 2022-03-31 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2022-02-03 | 2021-12-31 | 0.45 | 0.26 | -0.19 | 42 | ||
2021-10-27 | 2021-09-30 | 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.24 | 88 | ||
2021-07-28 | 2021-06-30 | -0.03 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 533 | ||
2021-04-28 | 2021-03-31 | 0.21 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 323 | ||
2021-02-04 | 2020-12-31 | -0.07 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 585 | ||
2020-10-28 | 2020-09-30 | 0.19 | 0.65 | 0.46 | 242 | ||
2020-07-30 | 2020-06-30 | -1.17 | -0.35 | 0.82 | 70 | ||
2020-04-28 | 2020-03-31 | -0.12 | -0.23 | -0.11 | 91 | ||
2020-02-04 | 2019-12-31 | 0.15 | 0.12 | -0.03 | 20 | ||
2019-10-23 | 2019-09-30 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 0.08 | 30 | ||
2019-07-24 | 2019-06-30 | 0.31 | 0.28 | -0.03 | 9 | ||
2019-04-25 | 2019-03-31 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 0.17 | 62 | ||
2019-01-23 | 2018-12-31 | 0.32 | 0.3 | -0.02 | 6 | ||
2018-10-24 | 2018-09-30 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2018-07-25 | 2018-06-30 | 0.31 | 0.27 | -0.04 | 12 | ||
2018-04-25 | 2018-03-31 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2018-01-24 | 2017-12-31 | 0.42 | 0.39 | -0.03 | 7 | ||
2017-10-26 | 2017-09-30 | 0.32 | 0.43 | 0.11 | 34 | ||
2017-07-26 | 2017-06-30 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.13 | 30 | ||
2017-04-27 | 2017-03-31 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2017-01-26 | 2016-12-31 | 0.31 | 0.3 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2016-10-27 | 2016-09-30 | 0.2 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 30 | ||
2016-07-28 | 2016-06-30 | 0.6 | 0.52 | -0.08 | 13 | ||
2016-04-28 | 2016-03-31 | 0.48 | 0.68 | 0.2 | 41 | ||
2016-01-28 | 2015-12-31 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.07 | 13 | ||
2015-10-27 | 2015-09-30 | 0.46 | 0.45 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2015-07-28 | 2015-06-30 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.1 | 27 | ||
2015-04-28 | 2015-03-31 | 0.26 | 0.23 | -0.03 | 11 | ||
2015-01-29 | 2014-12-31 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 13 | ||
2014-10-24 | 2014-09-30 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.05 | 26 | ||
2014-07-24 | 2014-06-30 | 0.36 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2014-04-25 | 2014-03-31 | 0.31 | 0.25 | -0.06 | 19 | ||
2014-01-28 | 2013-12-31 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 10 | ||
2013-10-24 | 2013-09-30 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.07 | 18 | ||
2013-07-24 | 2013-06-30 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.08 | 21 | ||
2013-04-24 | 2013-03-31 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.04 | 10 | ||
2013-01-29 | 2012-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.06 | 24 | ||
2012-10-30 | 2012-09-30 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 33 | ||
2012-07-25 | 2012-06-30 | 0.28 | 0.3 | 0.02 | 7 | ||
2012-04-27 | 2012-03-31 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2012-01-27 | 2011-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.2 | -0.05 | 20 | ||
2011-10-26 | 2011-09-30 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2011-07-26 | 2011-06-30 | 0.6 | 0.65 | 0.05 | 8 | ||
2011-04-26 | 2011-03-31 | 0.5 | 0.62 | 0.12 | 24 | ||
2011-01-28 | 2010-12-31 | 0.48 | 0.3 | -0.18 | 37 | ||
2010-10-26 | 2010-09-30 | 0.38 | 0.48 | 0.1 | 26 | ||
2010-07-23 | 2010-06-30 | 0.4 | 0.68 | 0.28 | 70 | ||
2010-04-27 | 2010-03-31 | 0.31 | 0.46 | 0.15 | 48 | ||
2010-01-28 | 2009-12-31 | 0.26 | 0.43 | 0.17 | 65 | ||
2009-11-02 | 2009-09-30 | -0.12 | 0.26 | 0.38 | 316 | ||
2009-07-23 | 2009-06-30 | -0.48 | -0.21 | 0.27 | 56 | ||
2009-04-24 | 2009-03-31 | -1.23 | -0.75 | 0.48 | 39 | ||
2009-01-29 | 2008-12-31 | -1.3 | -1.37 | -0.07 | 5 | ||
2008-11-07 | 2008-09-30 | -0.94 | -1.31 | -0.37 | 39 | ||
2008-07-24 | 2008-06-30 | -0.27 | -0.62 | -0.35 | 129 | ||
2008-04-24 | 2008-03-31 | -0.16 | 0.2 | 0.36 | 225 | ||
2008-01-24 | 2007-12-31 | -0.19 | -0.2 | -0.01 | 5 | ||
2007-11-08 | 2007-09-30 | -0.46 | -0.01 | 0.45 | 97 | ||
2007-07-26 | 2007-06-30 | -0.35 | 0.13 | 0.48 | 137 | ||
2007-04-26 | 2007-03-31 | -0.6 | -0.09 | 0.51 | 85 | ||
2007-01-25 | 2006-12-31 | -1.01 | -1.1 | -0.09 | 8 | ||
2006-10-23 | 2006-09-30 | -0.61 | -0.62 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2006-07-20 | 2006-06-30 | 0.12 | -0.03 | -0.15 | 125 | ||
2006-04-21 | 2006-03-31 | 0.25 | 0.24 | -0.01 | 4 | ||
2006-01-23 | 2005-12-31 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 2500 | ||
2005-10-20 | 2005-09-30 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-07-19 | 2005-06-30 | 0.33 | 0.47 | 0.14 | 42 | ||
2005-04-20 | 2005-03-31 | 0.39 | 0.62 | 0.23 | 58 | ||
2005-01-20 | 2004-12-31 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2004-10-19 | 2004-09-30 | 0.14 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 100 | ||
2004-07-20 | 2004-06-30 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 0.11 | 22 | ||
2004-04-21 | 2004-03-31 | 0.44 | 0.96 | 0.52 | 118 | ||
2004-01-22 | 2003-12-31 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 10 | ||
2003-10-16 | 2003-09-30 | -0.11 | 0.15 | 0.26 | 236 | ||
2003-07-16 | 2003-06-30 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 22 | ||
2003-04-16 | 2003-03-31 | 0.22 | 0.45 | 0.23 | 104 | ||
2003-01-21 | 2002-12-31 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 33 | ||
2002-10-16 | 2002-09-30 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 200 | ||
2002-07-17 | 2002-06-30 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.05 | 19 | ||
2002-04-17 | 2002-03-31 | -0.15 | -0.06 | 0.09 | 60 | ||
2002-01-17 | 2001-12-31 | -0.5 | -0.48 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2001-10-17 | 2001-09-30 | -0.27 | -0.28 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2001-07-18 | 2001-06-30 | -0.34 | -0.3 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2001-04-19 | 2001-03-31 | 0.53 | 0.6 | 0.07 | 13 | ||
2001-01-18 | 2000-12-31 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-10-18 | 2000-09-30 | 0.49 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2000-07-19 | 2000-06-30 | 2 | 2.07 | 0.07 | 3 | ||
2000-04-17 | 2000-03-31 | 1.57 | 1.7 | 0.13 | 8 | ||
2000-01-26 | 1999-12-31 | 1.45 | 1.47 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
1999-10-18 | 1999-09-30 | 0.84 | 0.9 | 0.06 | 7 | ||
1999-07-14 | 1999-06-30 | 1.95 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 2 | ||
1999-04-15 | 1999-03-31 | 1.41 | 1.46 | 0.05 | 3 | ||
1999-01-21 | 1998-12-31 | 1.26 | 1.35 | 0.09 | 7 | ||
1998-10-14 | 1998-09-30 | 0.79 | 0.8 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1998-07-15 | 1998-06-30 | 1.8 | 1.91 | 0.11 | 6 | ||
1998-04-16 | 1998-03-31 | 1.34 | 1.22 | -0.12 | 8 | ||
1998-01-27 | 1997-12-31 | 1.21 | 1.45 | 0.24 | 19 | ||
1997-10-15 | 1997-09-30 | 0.84 | 0.9 | 0.06 | 7 | ||
1997-07-16 | 1997-06-30 | 1.83 | 1.98 | 0.15 | 8 | ||
1997-04-16 | 1997-03-31 | 0.86 | 1.2 | 0.34 | 39 | ||
1997-01-29 | 1996-12-31 | 0.98 | 1.1 | 0.12 | 12 | ||
1996-10-16 | 1996-09-30 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1996-07-17 | 1996-06-30 | 1.21 | 1.38 | 0.17 | 14 | ||
1996-04-17 | 1996-03-31 | 0.34 | 0.53 | 0.19 | 55 |
Use Ford in pair-trading
Pair trading with Ford can help investors hedge some company-specific exposure by balancing a long view with an offsetting position. The key question is whether the second leg adds real hedge value instead of just creating a more complex version of the same risk.
Ford Pair Trading
Ford Motor Pair Trading Analysis
Using correlated positions as Ford substitutes during tax-loss harvesting allows investors to capture a tax benefit without disrupting portfolio allocation. The key is finding instruments that track Ford Motor closely enough to maintain equivalent risk and return.
The correlation of Ford with other assets is a key diversification metric. Pairing Ford Motor with uncorrelated or negatively correlated instruments can reduce overall portfolio volatility without necessarily reducing expected returns.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Ford can be used to frame hedging context. The view can be extended across sectors or other related groups.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Ford position
Using Ford Motor inside a theme workflow gives investors a structured way to compare related stocks, funds, ETFs, and crypto assets before allocating capital. The practical benefit is that the selected idea can be tuned either for higher upside or for tighter risk control.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Recycling Thematic Idea Now
Recycling
West management companies as well as entities specializing in pollution control and recycling. The Recycling theme has 45 constituents at this time.
You can either use a buy-and-hold strategy to lock in the entire theme or actively trade it to take advantage of the short-term price volatility of individual constituents. Macroaxis can help you discover thousands of investment opportunities in different asset classes. In addition, you can partner with us for reliable portfolio optimization as you plan to utilize Recycling Theme or any other thematic opportunities.
| View All Next | Launch |
More Resources for Ford Stock Analysis
Investing Opportunities. Analysis related to Ford should be read together with other portfolio and risk tools before capital is reallocated. That is especially important when the goal is to improve the overall mix of instruments already held. You can also try the Portfolio Holdings module to check your current holdings and cash position to determine if your portfolio needs rebalancing.
Projecting Ford's profitability starts with historical financial statements. The three primary statements are income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow.