Ford Net Income vs. Price To Earning
| F Stock | USD 11.59 -0.08 -0.69% |
Net Loss | First Reported 1985-09-30 | Previous Quarter 2.4 B | Current Value -11.1 B | Quarterly Volatility 2.8 B |
Macro event markers
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.18 | 0.1218 |
|
|
Profitability metrics for Ford Motor relate earnings to revenue, assets, and equity. Values are computed from the latest available financial statement data.
Investing Opportunities. Macro event markers
Quarterly Earnings Growth 1.727 | Dividend Share 0.6 | Earnings Share -2.06 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth -0.05 |
The gap between Ford's market value and book value reflects how the market perceives future potential versus historical cost. All figures are based on reported data and are informational in nature.
The concept of value for Ford differs from its quoted price, since each reflects a different lens. For Ford, key inputs include a P/E ratio of 6.14, a P/B ratio of 1.31, a profit margin of -4.37%, and ROE of -20.19%.
Ford Motor Price To Earning vs. Net Income Fundamental Analysis
Peer multiple analysis evaluates Ford's pricing efficiency within its industry. Ford Motor is rated below average in net income across its competitive set. It is rated below average in price to earning across its competitive set . Recent disclosures position Net Loss within a dropping cycle. A year ago, Ford reported Net Loss at -8.18 Billion. Comparative pricing ratios position Ford within industry norms.Ford Price To Earning vs. Net Income
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Ford |
| = | -8.16 B |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Price to Earnings ratio is typically used for current valuation of a company and is one of the most popular ratios that investors monitor daily. Holding a low PE stock is less risky because when a company's profitability falls, it is likely that earnings will also go down. In other words, if you start from a lower position, your downside risk is limited. There are also some investors who believe that low Price to Earnings ratio reflects the low pricing because a given company is in trouble. On the other hand, a higher PE ratio means that investors are paying more for each unit of profit.
Ford |
| = | 6.14 X |
Generally speaking, the Price to Earnings ratio gives investors an idea of what the market is willing to pay for the company's current earnings.
Ford Price To Earning Comparison
Ford is currently under evaluation in price to earning across its competitive set.
Ford Profitability Projections
Profits drive shareholder value, and Ford's profit trends deserve careful review. Checking Ford's current margins against past averages shows if profits are trending the right way. Ford currently maintains a profit margin of -4.4%. A rising trend is seen as positive, while a falling one is bad news for long-term investors. The operating margin stands at -6.7% while return on equity is -20.2%. Profit analysis is most useful when tracked over several reporting periods. Recent net income of -8.16 B reflects the bottom-line result of these profitability dynamics.
| Last Reported | End Of Year Estimate | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -7.7 B | -8.1 B | |
| Operating Income | 2.5 B | 2.4 B | |
| Income Before Tax | -11.8 B | -11.2 B | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -14.4 B | -13.6 B | |
| Net Loss | -8.2 B | -7.8 B | |
| Income Tax Expense | -3.7 B | -3.5 B | |
| Net Loss | -8.2 B | -7.8 B | |
| Net Loss | -8.2 B | -7.8 B | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | -9.2 B | -8.8 B | |
| Interest Income | 1.5 B | 1.3 B | |
| Net Interest Income | 157 M | 164.8 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 8.9 B | 9.4 B | |
| Net Loss | -2.06 | -1.95 | |
| Income Quality | -2.61 | -2.48 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.69 | 0.66 |
Ford Profitability Driver Comparison
The profitability drivers of Ford are key factors that directly shape its earnings trajectory. Unforeseen disruptions remain a persistent factor that could significantly affect Ford's earnings and value.
Earnings Estimation Breakdown
For Ford Motor, the next projected earnings per share is 0.2713 based on current analyst consensus. The range of individual analyst forecasts runs from 0.01 to 0.32, reflecting varying views on Ford's near-term business performance. Consensus EPS excludes non-recurring items and is calculated from trailing twelve-month operating results.Last Reported EPS
0.01 Lowest | Expected EPS | 0.32 Highest |
Earnings Projection Consensus
If consensus earnings estimates imply a fair value above Ford's current price, the market may be discounting future earnings more aggressively than analysts. If the market price is ahead of the estimate, the implied premium may require strong execution to sustain. These valuation signals are best used as one input within a multi-method investment framework.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 22 | 73.5% | 0.13 | 0.2713 | -2.06 |
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
For Ford, actual EPS provides a historical record of per-share profitability that investors use to identify trends. Expected EPS for Ford Motor projects this figure forward using guidance, industry dynamics, and financial analysis. The higher Ford's EPS trajectory, the stronger its implied earnings quality relative to peers.Estimated Months Earnings per Share
Investors seeking income from Ford should track EPS trends alongside dividend history to assess payout sustainability. EPS that outpaces dividend growth signals expanding coverage; EPS that lags dividend growth raises cut risk. Always complement EPS analysis with a review of operating leverage, working capital trends, and competitive positioning.Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
EPS surprise events for Ford's have historically correlated with short-term return outliers - both upside and downside. The post-earnings drift effect means that initial surprise reactions can persist over subsequent trading sessions. Analyst estimates contributing to consensus are derived from fundamental models trained on trailing performance and management guidance.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-02-03 | 2025-12-31 | 0.1155 | 0.13 | 0.0145 | 12 | ||
2025-10-23 | 2025-09-30 | 0.35 | 0.45 | 0.1 | 28 | ||
2025-07-30 | 2025-06-30 | 0.32 | 0.37 | 0.05 | 15 | ||
2025-05-05 | 2025-03-31 | 0.03 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 366 | ||
2025-02-05 | 2024-12-31 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 0.07 | 21 | ||
2024-10-28 | 2024-09-30 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2024-07-24 | 2024-06-30 | 0.68 | 0.47 | -0.21 | 30 | ||
2024-04-24 | 2024-03-31 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.07 | 16 | ||
2024-02-06 | 2023-12-31 | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.15 | 107 | ||
2023-10-26 | 2023-09-30 | 0.45 | 0.39 | -0.06 | 13 | ||
2023-07-27 | 2023-06-30 | 0.55 | 0.72 | 0.17 | 30 | ||
2023-05-02 | 2023-03-31 | 0.41 | 0.63 | 0.22 | 53 | ||
2023-02-02 | 2022-12-31 | 0.62 | 0.51 | -0.11 | 17 | ||
2022-10-26 | 2022-09-30 | 0.27 | 0.3 | 0.03 | 11 | ||
2022-07-27 | 2022-06-30 | 0.45 | 0.68 | 0.23 | 51 | ||
2022-04-27 | 2022-03-31 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2022-02-03 | 2021-12-31 | 0.45 | 0.26 | -0.19 | 42 | ||
2021-10-27 | 2021-09-30 | 0.27 | 0.51 | 0.24 | 88 | ||
2021-07-28 | 2021-06-30 | -0.03 | 0.13 | 0.16 | 533 | ||
2021-04-28 | 2021-03-31 | 0.21 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 323 | ||
2021-02-04 | 2020-12-31 | -0.07 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 585 | ||
2020-10-28 | 2020-09-30 | 0.19 | 0.65 | 0.46 | 242 | ||
2020-07-30 | 2020-06-30 | -1.17 | -0.35 | 0.82 | 70 | ||
2020-04-28 | 2020-03-31 | -0.12 | -0.23 | -0.11 | 91 | ||
2020-02-04 | 2019-12-31 | 0.15 | 0.12 | -0.03 | 20 | ||
2019-10-23 | 2019-09-30 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 0.08 | 30 | ||
2019-07-24 | 2019-06-30 | 0.31 | 0.28 | -0.03 | 9 | ||
2019-04-25 | 2019-03-31 | 0.27 | 0.44 | 0.17 | 62 | ||
2019-01-23 | 2018-12-31 | 0.32 | 0.3 | -0.02 | 6 | ||
2018-10-24 | 2018-09-30 | 0.28 | 0.29 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2018-07-25 | 2018-06-30 | 0.31 | 0.27 | -0.04 | 12 | ||
2018-04-25 | 2018-03-31 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2018-01-24 | 2017-12-31 | 0.42 | 0.39 | -0.03 | 7 | ||
2017-10-26 | 2017-09-30 | 0.32 | 0.43 | 0.11 | 34 | ||
2017-07-26 | 2017-06-30 | 0.43 | 0.56 | 0.13 | 30 | ||
2017-04-27 | 2017-03-31 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2017-01-26 | 2016-12-31 | 0.31 | 0.3 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2016-10-27 | 2016-09-30 | 0.2 | 0.26 | 0.06 | 30 | ||
2016-07-28 | 2016-06-30 | 0.6 | 0.52 | -0.08 | 13 | ||
2016-04-28 | 2016-03-31 | 0.48 | 0.68 | 0.2 | 41 | ||
2016-01-28 | 2015-12-31 | 0.51 | 0.58 | 0.07 | 13 | ||
2015-10-27 | 2015-09-30 | 0.46 | 0.45 | -0.01 | 2 | ||
2015-07-28 | 2015-06-30 | 0.37 | 0.47 | 0.1 | 27 | ||
2015-04-28 | 2015-03-31 | 0.26 | 0.23 | -0.03 | 11 | ||
2015-01-29 | 2014-12-31 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 13 | ||
2014-10-24 | 2014-09-30 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.05 | 26 | ||
2014-07-24 | 2014-06-30 | 0.36 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2014-04-25 | 2014-03-31 | 0.31 | 0.25 | -0.06 | 19 | ||
2014-01-28 | 2013-12-31 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 10 | ||
2013-10-24 | 2013-09-30 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.07 | 18 | ||
2013-07-24 | 2013-06-30 | 0.37 | 0.45 | 0.08 | 21 | ||
2013-04-24 | 2013-03-31 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.04 | 10 | ||
2013-01-29 | 2012-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.31 | 0.06 | 24 | ||
2012-10-30 | 2012-09-30 | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 33 | ||
2012-07-25 | 2012-06-30 | 0.28 | 0.3 | 0.02 | 7 | ||
2012-04-27 | 2012-03-31 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2012-01-27 | 2011-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.2 | -0.05 | 20 | ||
2011-10-26 | 2011-09-30 | 0.44 | 0.46 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2011-07-26 | 2011-06-30 | 0.6 | 0.65 | 0.05 | 8 | ||
2011-04-26 | 2011-03-31 | 0.5 | 0.62 | 0.12 | 24 | ||
2011-01-28 | 2010-12-31 | 0.48 | 0.3 | -0.18 | 37 | ||
2010-10-26 | 2010-09-30 | 0.38 | 0.48 | 0.1 | 26 | ||
2010-07-23 | 2010-06-30 | 0.4 | 0.68 | 0.28 | 70 | ||
2010-04-27 | 2010-03-31 | 0.31 | 0.46 | 0.15 | 48 | ||
2010-01-28 | 2009-12-31 | 0.26 | 0.43 | 0.17 | 65 | ||
2009-11-02 | 2009-09-30 | -0.12 | 0.26 | 0.38 | 316 | ||
2009-07-23 | 2009-06-30 | -0.48 | -0.21 | 0.27 | 56 | ||
2009-04-24 | 2009-03-31 | -1.23 | -0.75 | 0.48 | 39 | ||
2009-01-29 | 2008-12-31 | -1.3 | -1.37 | -0.07 | 5 | ||
2008-11-07 | 2008-09-30 | -0.94 | -1.31 | -0.37 | 39 | ||
2008-07-24 | 2008-06-30 | -0.27 | -0.62 | -0.35 | 129 | ||
2008-04-24 | 2008-03-31 | -0.16 | 0.2 | 0.36 | 225 | ||
2008-01-24 | 2007-12-31 | -0.19 | -0.2 | -0.01 | 5 | ||
2007-11-08 | 2007-09-30 | -0.46 | -0.01 | 0.45 | 97 | ||
2007-07-26 | 2007-06-30 | -0.35 | 0.13 | 0.48 | 137 | ||
2007-04-26 | 2007-03-31 | -0.6 | -0.09 | 0.51 | 85 | ||
2007-01-25 | 2006-12-31 | -1.01 | -1.1 | -0.09 | 8 | ||
2006-10-23 | 2006-09-30 | -0.61 | -0.62 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2006-07-20 | 2006-06-30 | 0.12 | -0.03 | -0.15 | 125 | ||
2006-04-21 | 2006-03-31 | 0.25 | 0.24 | -0.01 | 4 | ||
2006-01-23 | 2005-12-31 | 0.01 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 2500 | ||
2005-10-20 | 2005-09-30 | -0.1 | -0.1 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2005-07-19 | 2005-06-30 | 0.33 | 0.47 | 0.14 | 42 | ||
2005-04-20 | 2005-03-31 | 0.39 | 0.62 | 0.23 | 58 | ||
2005-01-20 | 2004-12-31 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2004-10-19 | 2004-09-30 | 0.14 | 0.28 | 0.14 | 100 | ||
2004-07-20 | 2004-06-30 | 0.5 | 0.61 | 0.11 | 22 | ||
2004-04-21 | 2004-03-31 | 0.44 | 0.96 | 0.52 | 118 | ||
2004-01-22 | 2003-12-31 | 0.28 | 0.31 | 0.03 | 10 | ||
2003-10-16 | 2003-09-30 | -0.11 | 0.15 | 0.26 | 236 | ||
2003-07-16 | 2003-06-30 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 22 | ||
2003-04-16 | 2003-03-31 | 0.22 | 0.45 | 0.23 | 104 | ||
2003-01-21 | 2002-12-31 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 33 | ||
2002-10-16 | 2002-09-30 | 0.04 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 200 | ||
2002-07-17 | 2002-06-30 | 0.26 | 0.31 | 0.05 | 19 | ||
2002-04-17 | 2002-03-31 | -0.15 | -0.06 | 0.09 | 60 | ||
2002-01-17 | 2001-12-31 | -0.5 | -0.48 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2001-10-17 | 2001-09-30 | -0.27 | -0.28 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2001-07-18 | 2001-06-30 | -0.34 | -0.3 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2001-04-19 | 2001-03-31 | 0.53 | 0.6 | 0.07 | 13 | ||
2001-01-18 | 2000-12-31 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-10-18 | 2000-09-30 | 0.49 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2000-07-19 | 2000-06-30 | 2 | 2.07 | 0.07 | 3 | ||
2000-04-17 | 2000-03-31 | 1.57 | 1.7 | 0.13 | 8 | ||
2000-01-26 | 1999-12-31 | 1.45 | 1.47 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
1999-10-18 | 1999-09-30 | 0.84 | 0.9 | 0.06 | 7 | ||
1999-07-14 | 1999-06-30 | 1.95 | 2.0 | 0.05 | 2 | ||
1999-04-15 | 1999-03-31 | 1.41 | 1.46 | 0.05 | 3 | ||
1999-01-21 | 1998-12-31 | 1.26 | 1.35 | 0.09 | 7 | ||
1998-10-14 | 1998-09-30 | 0.79 | 0.8 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1998-07-15 | 1998-06-30 | 1.8 | 1.91 | 0.11 | 6 | ||
1998-04-16 | 1998-03-31 | 1.34 | 1.22 | -0.12 | 8 | ||
1998-01-27 | 1997-12-31 | 1.21 | 1.45 | 0.24 | 19 | ||
1997-10-15 | 1997-09-30 | 0.84 | 0.9 | 0.06 | 7 | ||
1997-07-16 | 1997-06-30 | 1.83 | 1.98 | 0.15 | 8 | ||
1997-04-16 | 1997-03-31 | 0.86 | 1.2 | 0.34 | 39 | ||
1997-01-29 | 1996-12-31 | 0.98 | 1.1 | 0.12 | 12 | ||
1996-10-16 | 1996-09-30 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1996-07-17 | 1996-06-30 | 1.21 | 1.38 | 0.17 | 14 | ||
1996-04-17 | 1996-03-31 | 0.34 | 0.53 | 0.19 | 55 |
Use Ford in pair-trading
A pair strategy built around Ford Motor is useful when investors want to reduce directional market exposure while still expressing a relative-value idea. This framework is most useful when investors want to hedge directional moves caused by sector headlines or broad market pressure.
Ford Pair Trading
Ford Motor Pair Trading Analysis
Identifying assets closely correlated with Ford is essential for tax-loss harvesting strategies. The wash-sale rule prohibits repurchasing Ford Motor within 30 days of a loss sale.
The correlation coefficient for Ford quantifies co-movement strength on a scale from -1 to +1. Holding two assets with correlation close to +1 alongside Ford Motor offers minimal diversification value.
Pair evaluation and Correlation analysis for Ford provide hedging context. Historical correlation patterns provide the basis for identifying potential hedging pairs.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Ford position
At 47.24 Billion in the Auto Manufacturers space, Ford Motor mid-cap profile gives investors a structured starting point for building sector-aligned themes. Anchoring a Auto Manufacturers theme around Ford Motor at 47.24 Billion can be tuned for upside participation or tighter downside control depending on Consumer Cyclical outlook.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Aluminum Thematic Idea Now
Aluminum
Companies involved in production of aluminum. The Aluminum theme has 41 constituents at this time.
Investors can hold the Aluminum Theme as a long-term basket or actively trade individual constituents to capture short-term price movement.
| View All Next | Launch |