Grid Dynamics Holdings Stock Z Score
| GDYN Stock | | | USD 7.58 0.18 2.32% |
Altman Z Score is one of the simplest fundamental models to determine how likely your company is to fail. The module uses available fundamental data of a given equity to approximate the Altman Z score. Altman Z Score is determined by evaluating five fundamental price points available from the company's current public disclosure documents. Check out
Grid Dynamics Piotroski F Score and
Grid Dynamics Valuation analysis.
Grid Dynamics Holdings Company Z Score Analysis
Grid Dynamics' Z-Score is a simple linear, multi-factor model that measures the financial health and economic stability of a company. The score is used to predict the probability of a firm going into bankruptcy within next 24 months or two fiscal years from the day stated on the accounting statements used to calculate it. The model uses five fundamental business ratios that are weighted according to algorithm of Professor Edward Altman who developed it in the late 1960s at New York University..
| First Factor | = | 1.2 * ( | Working Capital | / | Total Assets ) |
|
| Second Factor | = | 1.4 * ( | Retained Earnings | / | Total Assets ) |
|
| Thrid Factor | = | 3.3 * ( | EBITAD | / | Total Assets ) |
|
| Fouth Factor | = | 0.6 * ( | Market Value of Equity | / | Total Liabilities ) |
|
| Fifth Factor | = | 0.99 * ( | Revenue | / | Total Assets ) |
|
To calculate a Z-Score, one would need to know a company's current working capital, its total assets and liabilities, and the amount of its latest earnings as well as earnings before interest and tax. Z-Scores can be used to compare the odds of bankruptcy of companies in a similar line of business or firms operating in the same industry. Companies with Z-Scores above 3.1 are generally considered to be stable and healthy with a low probability of bankruptcy. Scores that fall between 1.8 and 3.1 lie in a so-called 'grey area,' with scores of less than 1 indicating the highest probability of distress. Z Score is a used widely measure by financial auditors, accountants, money managers, loan processors, wealth advisers, and day traders. In the last 25 years, many financial models that utilize z-scores proved it to be successful as a predictor of corporate bankruptcy.
According to the company's disclosures, Grid Dynamics Holdings has a Z Score of 0.0. This is 100.0% lower than that of the IT Services sector and 100.0% lower than that of the
Information Technology industry. The z score for all United States stocks is 100.0% higher than that of the company.
| | Equity ForecastingUse basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum |
Grid Fundamentals
About Grid Dynamics Fundamental Analysis
The Macroaxis Fundamental Analysis modules help investors analyze Grid Dynamics Holdings's financials across various querterly and yearly statements, indicators and fundamental ratios. We help investors to determine the real value of Grid Dynamics using virtually all public information available. We use both quantitative as well as qualitative analysis to arrive at
the intrinsic value of Grid Dynamics Holdings based on its fundamental data. In general, a quantitative approach, as applied to this company, focuses on analyzing
financial statements comparatively, whereas a qaualitative method uses data that is important to a company's growth but cannot be measured and presented in a numerical way.
Pair Trading with Grid Dynamics
One of the main advantages of trading using pair correlations is that every trade hedges away some risk. Because there are two separate transactions required, even if Grid Dynamics position performs unexpectedly, the other equity can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Grid Dynamics will appreciate offsetting losses from the drop in the long position's value.The ability to find closely correlated positions to Grid Dynamics could be a great tool in your tax-loss harvesting strategies, allowing investors a quick way to find a similar-enough asset to replace Grid Dynamics when you sell it. If you don't do this, your portfolio allocation will be skewed against your target asset allocation. So, investors can't just sell and buy back Grid Dynamics - that would be a violation of the tax code under the "wash sale" rule, and this is why you need to find a similar enough asset and use the proceeds from selling Grid Dynamics Holdings to buy it.
The correlation of Grid Dynamics is a statistical measure of how it moves in relation to other instruments. This measure is expressed in what is known as the correlation coefficient, which ranges between -1 and +1. A perfect positive correlation (i.e., a correlation coefficient of +1) implies that as Grid Dynamics moves, either up or down, the other security will move in the same direction. Alternatively, perfect negative correlation means that if Grid Dynamics Holdings moves in either direction, the perfectly negatively correlated security will move in the opposite direction. If the correlation is 0, the equities are not correlated; they are entirely random. A correlation greater than 0.8 is generally described as strong, whereas a correlation less than 0.5 is generally considered weak.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for Grid Dynamics can also be used as hedging techniques within a particular sector or industry or even over random equities to generate a better risk-adjusted return on your portfolios.
Is Internet Services & Infrastructure space expected to grow? Or is there an opportunity to expand the business' product line in the future? Factors like these will boost
the valuation of Grid Dynamics. If investors know Grid will grow in the future, the company's valuation will be higher. The financial industry is built on trying to define current growth potential and future valuation accurately. All the valuation information about Grid Dynamics listed above have to be considered, but the key to understanding future value is determining which factors weigh more heavily than others.
The market value of Grid Dynamics Holdings is measured differently than its book value, which is the value of Grid that is recorded on the company's balance sheet. Investors also form their own opinion of Grid Dynamics' value that differs from its market value or its book value, called intrinsic value, which is Grid Dynamics' true underlying value. Investors use various methods to calculate intrinsic value and buy a stock when its market value falls below its intrinsic value. Because Grid Dynamics' market value can be influenced by many factors that don't directly affect Grid Dynamics' underlying business (such as a pandemic or basic market pessimism), market value can vary widely from intrinsic value.
Please note, there is a significant difference between Grid Dynamics' value and its price as these two are different measures arrived at by different means. Investors typically determine
if Grid Dynamics is a good investment by looking at such factors as earnings, sales, fundamental and technical indicators, competition as well as analyst projections. However, Grid Dynamics' price is the amount at which it trades on the open market and represents the number that a seller and buyer find agreeable to each party.