Correlation Between Woodward and Moog
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Woodward and Moog at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Woodward and Moog into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Woodward and Moog Inc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Woodward and Moog and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Woodward with a short position of Moog. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Woodward and Moog.
Diversification Opportunities for Woodward and Moog
Very poor diversification
The 3 months correlation between Woodward and Moog is 0.88. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Woodward and Moog Inc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Moog Inc and Woodward is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Woodward are associated (or correlated) with Moog. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Moog Inc has no effect on the direction of Woodward i.e., Woodward and Moog go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between Woodward and Moog
Considering the 90-day investment horizon Woodward is expected to generate 1.06 times more return on investment than Moog. However, Woodward is 1.06 times more volatile than Moog Inc. It trades about 0.16 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Moog Inc is currently generating about 0.04 per unit of risk. If you would invest 17,662 in Woodward on March 13, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of 5,310 from holding Woodward or generate 30.06% return on investment over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Together |
| Strength | Strong |
| Accuracy | 100.0% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
Woodward vs. Moog Inc
Performance |
| Timeline |
| Woodward |
| Moog Inc |
Woodward and Moog Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with Woodward and Moog
The main advantage of trading using opposite Woodward and Moog positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Woodward position performs unexpectedly, Moog can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Moog will offset losses from the drop in Moog's long position.| Woodward vs. Hexcel | Woodward vs. Ducommun Incorporated | Woodward vs. Mercury Systems | Woodward vs. AAR Corp |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Correlation Analysis module to reduce portfolio risk simply by holding instruments which are not perfectly correlated.
Other Complementary Tools
| Share Portfolio Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device | |
| Idea Optimizer Use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio | |
| Pair Correlation Compare performance and examine fundamental relationship between any two equity instruments | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Money Managers Screen money managers from public funds and ETFs managed around the world |