Correlation Between Templeton Global and Mfs Emerging

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Templeton Global and Mfs Emerging at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Templeton Global and Mfs Emerging into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Templeton Global Balanced and Mfs Emerging Markets, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Templeton Global and Mfs Emerging and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Templeton Global with a short position of Mfs Emerging. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Templeton Global and Mfs Emerging.

Diversification Opportunities for Templeton Global and Mfs Emerging

0.97
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Templeton and Mfs is 0.97. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Templeton Global Balanced and Mfs Emerging Markets in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Mfs Emerging Markets and Templeton Global is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Templeton Global Balanced are associated (or correlated) with Mfs Emerging. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Mfs Emerging Markets has no effect on the direction of Templeton Global i.e., Templeton Global and Mfs Emerging go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Templeton Global and Mfs Emerging

Assuming the 90 days horizon Templeton Global Balanced is expected to generate 2.07 times more return on investment than Mfs Emerging. However, Templeton Global is 2.07 times more volatile than Mfs Emerging Markets. It trades about 0.11 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Mfs Emerging Markets is currently generating about 0.13 per unit of risk. If you would invest  272.00  in Templeton Global Balanced on June 9, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  7.00  from holding Templeton Global Balanced or generate 2.57% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Templeton Global Balanced  vs.  Mfs Emerging Markets

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Templeton Global Balanced 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Templeton Global Balanced are ranked lower than 12 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong fundamental indicators, Templeton Global is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Mfs Emerging Markets 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Mfs Emerging Markets are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Mfs Emerging is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Templeton Global and Mfs Emerging Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Templeton Global and Mfs Emerging

The main advantage of trading using opposite Templeton Global and Mfs Emerging positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Templeton Global position performs unexpectedly, Mfs Emerging can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Mfs Emerging will offset losses from the drop in Mfs Emerging's long position.
The idea behind Templeton Global Balanced and Mfs Emerging Markets pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio Anywhere module to track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device.

Other Complementary Tools

Share Portfolio
Track or share privately all of your investments from the convenience of any device
Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
CEOs Directory
Screen CEOs from public companies around the world
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Latest Portfolios
Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios