Correlation Between SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace Group, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in SMC Corp with a short position of Bridger Aerospace. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace.
Diversification Opportunities for SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace
-0.3 | Correlation Coefficient |
Very good diversification
The 3 months correlation between SMC and Bridger is -0.3. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace Group in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Bridger Aerospace and SMC Corp is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on SMC Corp are associated (or correlated) with Bridger Aerospace. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Bridger Aerospace has no effect on the direction of SMC Corp i.e., SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace go up and down completely randomly.
Pair Corralation between SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace
Assuming the 90 days horizon SMC Corp is expected to under-perform the Bridger Aerospace. But the pink sheet apears to be less risky and, when comparing its historical volatility, SMC Corp is 27.03 times less risky than Bridger Aerospace. The pink sheet trades about -0.04 of its potential returns per unit of risk. The Bridger Aerospace Group is currently generating about 0.08 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest 18.00 in Bridger Aerospace Group on June 11, 2025 and sell it today you would lose (6.00) from holding Bridger Aerospace Group or give up 33.33% of portfolio value over 90 days.
| Time Period | 3 Months [change] |
| Direction | Moves Against |
| Strength | Insignificant |
| Accuracy | 85.35% |
| Values | Daily Returns |
SMC Corp vs. Bridger Aerospace Group
Performance |
| Timeline |
| SMC Corp |
| Bridger Aerospace |
SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace Volatility Contrast
Predicted Return Density |
| Returns |
Pair Trading with SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace
The main advantage of trading using opposite SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if SMC Corp position performs unexpectedly, Bridger Aerospace can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Bridger Aerospace will offset losses from the drop in Bridger Aerospace's long position.The idea behind SMC Corp and Bridger Aerospace Group pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.| Bridger Aerospace vs. Mobilicom Limited American | Bridger Aerospace vs. Sonim Technologies | Bridger Aerospace vs. PowerFleet, | Bridger Aerospace vs. Moving iMage Technologies |
Check out your portfolio center.Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Sign In To Macroaxis module to sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules.
Other Complementary Tools
| Financial Widgets Easily integrated Macroaxis content with over 30 different plug-and-play financial widgets | |
| Latest Portfolios Quick portfolio dashboard that showcases your latest portfolios | |
| Volatility Analysis Get historical volatility and risk analysis based on latest market data | |
| Portfolio Center All portfolio management and optimization tools to improve performance of your portfolios | |
| Risk-Return Analysis View associations between returns expected from investment and the risk you assume |