Correlation Between Moderately Aggressive and Jpmorgan Government

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Moderately Aggressive and Jpmorgan Government at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Moderately Aggressive and Jpmorgan Government into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Moderately Aggressive Balanced and Jpmorgan Government Bond, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Moderately Aggressive and Jpmorgan Government and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Moderately Aggressive with a short position of Jpmorgan Government. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Moderately Aggressive and Jpmorgan Government.

Diversification Opportunities for Moderately Aggressive and Jpmorgan Government

0.85
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Moderately and Jpmorgan is 0.85. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Moderately Aggressive Balanced and Jpmorgan Government Bond in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Jpmorgan Government Bond and Moderately Aggressive is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Moderately Aggressive Balanced are associated (or correlated) with Jpmorgan Government. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Jpmorgan Government Bond has no effect on the direction of Moderately Aggressive i.e., Moderately Aggressive and Jpmorgan Government go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Moderately Aggressive and Jpmorgan Government

Assuming the 90 days horizon Moderately Aggressive Balanced is expected to generate 1.92 times more return on investment than Jpmorgan Government. However, Moderately Aggressive is 1.92 times more volatile than Jpmorgan Government Bond. It trades about 0.2 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Jpmorgan Government Bond is currently generating about 0.19 per unit of risk. If you would invest  1,221  in Moderately Aggressive Balanced on June 8, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  72.00  from holding Moderately Aggressive Balanced or generate 5.9% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Moderately Aggressive Balanced  vs.  Jpmorgan Government Bond

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Moderately Aggressive 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Moderately Aggressive Balanced are ranked lower than 15 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Moderately Aggressive is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Jpmorgan Government Bond 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Jpmorgan Government Bond are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong basic indicators, Jpmorgan Government is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.

Moderately Aggressive and Jpmorgan Government Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Moderately Aggressive and Jpmorgan Government

The main advantage of trading using opposite Moderately Aggressive and Jpmorgan Government positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Moderately Aggressive position performs unexpectedly, Jpmorgan Government can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Jpmorgan Government will offset losses from the drop in Jpmorgan Government's long position.
The idea behind Moderately Aggressive Balanced and Jpmorgan Government Bond pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Earnings Calls module to check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges.

Other Complementary Tools

Equity Forecasting
Use basic forecasting models to generate price predictions and determine price momentum
Alpha Finder
Use alpha and beta coefficients to find investment opportunities after accounting for the risk
Portfolio File Import
Quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format
Transaction History
View history of all your transactions and understand their impact on performance
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm