Correlation Between PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in PROG Holdings with a short position of Flutter Entertainment. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment.

Diversification Opportunities for PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment

0.54
  Correlation Coefficient

Very weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between PROG and Flutter is 0.54. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Flutter Entertainment plc and PROG Holdings is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on PROG Holdings are associated (or correlated) with Flutter Entertainment. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Flutter Entertainment plc has no effect on the direction of PROG Holdings i.e., PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment

Considering the 90-day investment horizon PROG Holdings is expected to generate 1.35 times less return on investment than Flutter Entertainment. In addition to that, PROG Holdings is 1.49 times more volatile than Flutter Entertainment plc. It trades about 0.09 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Flutter Entertainment plc is currently generating about 0.18 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  24,098  in Flutter Entertainment plc on May 23, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  5,355  from holding Flutter Entertainment plc or generate 22.22% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthWeak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

PROG Holdings  vs.  Flutter Entertainment plc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
PROG Holdings 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Fair

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in PROG Holdings are ranked lower than 7 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. Despite nearly fragile basic indicators, PROG Holdings reported solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.
Flutter Entertainment plc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Flutter Entertainment plc are ranked lower than 14 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak basic indicators, Flutter Entertainment unveiled solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment

The main advantage of trading using opposite PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if PROG Holdings position performs unexpectedly, Flutter Entertainment can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Flutter Entertainment will offset losses from the drop in Flutter Entertainment's long position.
The idea behind PROG Holdings and Flutter Entertainment plc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Insider Screener module to find insiders across different sectors to evaluate their impact on performance.

Other Complementary Tools

My Watchlist Analysis
Analyze my current watchlist and to refresh optimization strategy. Macroaxis watchlist is based on self-learning algorithm to remember stocks you like
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Companies Directory
Evaluate performance of over 100,000 Stocks, Funds, and ETFs against different fundamentals
Investing Opportunities
Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences
Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm