Correlation Between Microsoft and Guidepath(r) Growth

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Microsoft and Guidepath(r) Growth at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Microsoft and Guidepath(r) Growth into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Microsoft and Guidepath Growth Allocation, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Microsoft and Guidepath(r) Growth and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Microsoft with a short position of Guidepath(r) Growth. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Microsoft and Guidepath(r) Growth.

Diversification Opportunities for Microsoft and Guidepath(r) Growth

0.92
  Correlation Coefficient

Almost no diversification

The 3 months correlation between Microsoft and Guidepath(r) is 0.92. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Microsoft and Guidepath Growth Allocation in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Guidepath Growth All and Microsoft is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Microsoft are associated (or correlated) with Guidepath(r) Growth. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Guidepath Growth All has no effect on the direction of Microsoft i.e., Microsoft and Guidepath(r) Growth go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Microsoft and Guidepath(r) Growth

Given the investment horizon of 90 days Microsoft is expected to generate 1.49 times more return on investment than Guidepath(r) Growth. However, Microsoft is 1.49 times more volatile than Guidepath Growth Allocation. It trades about 0.17 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Guidepath Growth Allocation is currently generating about 0.23 per unit of risk. If you would invest  45,993  in Microsoft on May 26, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  4,730  from holding Microsoft or generate 10.28% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Strong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Microsoft  vs.  Guidepath Growth Allocation

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Microsoft 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Good

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Microsoft are ranked lower than 13 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of comparatively weak technical and fundamental indicators, Microsoft may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in September 2025.
Guidepath Growth All 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Guidepath Growth Allocation are ranked lower than 18 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak basic indicators, Guidepath(r) Growth may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in September 2025.

Microsoft and Guidepath(r) Growth Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Microsoft and Guidepath(r) Growth

The main advantage of trading using opposite Microsoft and Guidepath(r) Growth positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Microsoft position performs unexpectedly, Guidepath(r) Growth can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Guidepath(r) Growth will offset losses from the drop in Guidepath(r) Growth's long position.
The idea behind Microsoft and Guidepath Growth Allocation pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Performance Analysis module to check effects of mean-variance optimization against your current asset allocation.

Other Complementary Tools

ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Pattern Recognition
Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges
Odds Of Bankruptcy
Get analysis of equity chance of financial distress in the next 2 years
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Idea Analyzer
Analyze all characteristics, volatility and risk-adjusted return of Macroaxis ideas