Correlation Between Lowland Investment and Zegona Communications

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Lowland Investment and Zegona Communications at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Lowland Investment and Zegona Communications into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Lowland Investment Co and Zegona Communications Plc, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Lowland Investment and Zegona Communications and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Lowland Investment with a short position of Zegona Communications. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Lowland Investment and Zegona Communications.

Diversification Opportunities for Lowland Investment and Zegona Communications

0.39
  Correlation Coefficient

Weak diversification

The 3 months correlation between Lowland and Zegona is 0.39. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Lowland Investment Co and Zegona Communications Plc in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Zegona Communications Plc and Lowland Investment is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Lowland Investment Co are associated (or correlated) with Zegona Communications. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Zegona Communications Plc has no effect on the direction of Lowland Investment i.e., Lowland Investment and Zegona Communications go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Lowland Investment and Zegona Communications

Assuming the 90 days trading horizon Lowland Investment is expected to generate 1.68 times less return on investment than Zegona Communications. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Lowland Investment Co is 3.52 times less risky than Zegona Communications. It trades about 0.14 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Zegona Communications Plc is currently generating about 0.07 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  123,500  in Zegona Communications Plc on September 11, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  10,500  from holding Zegona Communications Plc or generate 8.5% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthVery Weak
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Lowland Investment Co  vs.  Zegona Communications Plc

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Lowland Investment 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Fair

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Lowland Investment Co are ranked lower than 10 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather sound technical and fundamental indicators, Lowland Investment is not utilizing all of its potentials. The newest stock price tumult, may contribute to shorter-term losses for the shareholders.
Zegona Communications Plc 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Mild

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Zegona Communications Plc are ranked lower than 5 (%) of all global equities and portfolios over the last 90 days. In spite of rather uncertain technical and fundamental indicators, Zegona Communications may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in January 2026.

Lowland Investment and Zegona Communications Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Lowland Investment and Zegona Communications

The main advantage of trading using opposite Lowland Investment and Zegona Communications positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Lowland Investment position performs unexpectedly, Zegona Communications can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Zegona Communications will offset losses from the drop in Zegona Communications' long position.
The idea behind Lowland Investment Co and Zegona Communications Plc pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Portfolio File Import module to quickly import all of your third-party portfolios from your local drive in csv format.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Optimization
Compute new portfolio that will generate highest expected return given your specified tolerance for risk
ETFs
Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) from around the world
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Bonds Directory
Find actively traded corporate debentures issued by US companies
Portfolio Volatility
Check portfolio volatility and analyze historical return density to properly model market risk