Correlation Between Cohen Steers and Morgan Stanley

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Cohen Steers and Morgan Stanley at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Cohen Steers and Morgan Stanley into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Cohen Steers Real and Morgan Stanley Emerging, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Cohen Steers and Morgan Stanley and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Cohen Steers with a short position of Morgan Stanley. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Cohen Steers and Morgan Stanley.

Diversification Opportunities for Cohen Steers and Morgan Stanley

0.88
  Correlation Coefficient

Very poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Cohen and Morgan is 0.88. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Cohen Steers Real and Morgan Stanley Emerging in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Morgan Stanley Emerging and Cohen Steers is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Cohen Steers Real are associated (or correlated) with Morgan Stanley. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Morgan Stanley Emerging has no effect on the direction of Cohen Steers i.e., Cohen Steers and Morgan Stanley go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Cohen Steers and Morgan Stanley

Assuming the 90 days horizon Cohen Steers is expected to generate 1.18 times less return on investment than Morgan Stanley. In addition to that, Cohen Steers is 2.06 times more volatile than Morgan Stanley Emerging. It trades about 0.12 of its total potential returns per unit of risk. Morgan Stanley Emerging is currently generating about 0.28 per unit of volatility. If you would invest  510.00  in Morgan Stanley Emerging on April 15, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  37.00  from holding Morgan Stanley Emerging or generate 7.25% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthStrong
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Cohen Steers Real  vs.  Morgan Stanley Emerging

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Cohen Steers Real 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

OK

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Cohen Steers Real are ranked lower than 9 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Cohen Steers is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Morgan Stanley Emerging 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Morgan Stanley Emerging are ranked lower than 22 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak fundamental indicators, Morgan Stanley may actually be approaching a critical reversion point that can send shares even higher in August 2025.

Cohen Steers and Morgan Stanley Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Cohen Steers and Morgan Stanley

The main advantage of trading using opposite Cohen Steers and Morgan Stanley positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Cohen Steers position performs unexpectedly, Morgan Stanley can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Morgan Stanley will offset losses from the drop in Morgan Stanley's long position.
The idea behind Cohen Steers Real and Morgan Stanley Emerging pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Price Ceiling Movement module to calculate and plot Price Ceiling Movement for different equity instruments.

Other Complementary Tools

Portfolio Holdings
Check your current holdings and cash postion to detemine if your portfolio needs rebalancing
Sign In To Macroaxis
Sign in to explore Macroaxis' wealth optimization platform and fintech modules
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Efficient Frontier
Plot and analyze your portfolio and positions against risk-return landscape of the market.
Instant Ratings
Determine any equity ratings based on digital recommendations. Macroaxis instant equity ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance