Correlation Between Credit Suisse and Columbia Global

Specify exactly 2 symbols:
Can any of the company-specific risk be diversified away by investing in both Credit Suisse and Columbia Global at the same time? Although using a correlation coefficient on its own may not help to predict future stock returns, this module helps to understand the diversifiable risk of combining Credit Suisse and Columbia Global into the same portfolio, which is an essential part of the fundamental portfolio management process.
By analyzing existing cross correlation between Credit Suisse Floating and Columbia Global Technology, you can compare the effects of market volatilities on Credit Suisse and Columbia Global and check how they will diversify away market risk if combined in the same portfolio for a given time horizon. You can also utilize pair trading strategies of matching a long position in Credit Suisse with a short position of Columbia Global. Check out your portfolio center. Please also check ongoing floating volatility patterns of Credit Suisse and Columbia Global.

Diversification Opportunities for Credit Suisse and Columbia Global

0.73
  Correlation Coefficient

Poor diversification

The 3 months correlation between Credit and Columbia is 0.73. Overlapping area represents the amount of risk that can be diversified away by holding Credit Suisse Floating and Columbia Global Technology in the same portfolio, assuming nothing else is changed. The correlation between historical prices or returns on Columbia Global Tech and Credit Suisse is a relative statistical measure of the degree to which these equity instruments tend to move together. The correlation coefficient measures the extent to which returns on Credit Suisse Floating are associated (or correlated) with Columbia Global. Values of the correlation coefficient range from -1 to +1, where. The correlation of zero (0) is possible when the price movement of Columbia Global Tech has no effect on the direction of Credit Suisse i.e., Credit Suisse and Columbia Global go up and down completely randomly.

Pair Corralation between Credit Suisse and Columbia Global

Assuming the 90 days horizon Credit Suisse is expected to generate 6.56 times less return on investment than Columbia Global. But when comparing it to its historical volatility, Credit Suisse Floating is 5.73 times less risky than Columbia Global. It trades about 0.22 of its potential returns per unit of risk. Columbia Global Technology is currently generating about 0.25 of returns per unit of risk over similar time horizon. If you would invest  9,176  in Columbia Global Technology on May 29, 2025 and sell it today you would earn a total of  1,340  from holding Columbia Global Technology or generate 14.6% return on investment over 90 days.
Time Period3 Months [change]
DirectionMoves Together 
StrengthSignificant
Accuracy100.0%
ValuesDaily Returns

Credit Suisse Floating  vs.  Columbia Global Technology

 Performance 
       Timeline  
Credit Suisse Floating 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Credit Suisse Floating are ranked lower than 16 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly strong forward indicators, Credit Suisse is not utilizing all of its potentials. The current stock price disturbance, may contribute to short-term losses for the investors.
Columbia Global Tech 

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Solid

 
Weak
 
Strong
Compared to the overall equity markets, risk-adjusted returns on investments in Columbia Global Technology are ranked lower than 19 (%) of all funds and portfolios of funds over the last 90 days. In spite of fairly weak technical and fundamental indicators, Columbia Global showed solid returns over the last few months and may actually be approaching a breakup point.

Credit Suisse and Columbia Global Volatility Contrast

   Predicted Return Density   
       Returns  

Pair Trading with Credit Suisse and Columbia Global

The main advantage of trading using opposite Credit Suisse and Columbia Global positions is that it hedges away some unsystematic risk. Because of two separate transactions, even if Credit Suisse position performs unexpectedly, Columbia Global can make up some of the losses. Pair trading also minimizes risk from directional movements in the market. For example, if an entire industry or sector drops because of unexpected headlines, the short position in Columbia Global will offset losses from the drop in Columbia Global's long position.
The idea behind Credit Suisse Floating and Columbia Global Technology pairs trading is to make the combined position market-neutral, meaning the overall market's direction will not affect its win or loss (or potential downside or upside). This can be achieved by designing a pairs trade with two highly correlated stocks or equities that operate in a similar space or sector, making it possible to obtain profits through simple and relatively low-risk investment.
Check out your portfolio center.
Note that this page's information should be used as a complementary analysis to find the right mix of equity instruments to add to your existing portfolios or create a brand new portfolio. You can also try the Stock Screener module to find equities using a custom stock filter or screen asymmetry in trading patterns, price, volume, or investment outlook..

Other Complementary Tools

Watchlist Optimization
Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm
Theme Ratings
Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Global Correlations
Find global opportunities by holding instruments from different markets
Positions Ratings
Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance
Piotroski F Score
Get Piotroski F Score based on the binary analysis strategy of nine different fundamentals