ReTo Eco Company Leadership

RETO Stock  USD 0.88  -0.14  -13.73%   
ReTo Eco employs about 46 people. The company is managed by 6 executives with a total tenure of roughly 30 years, averaging almost 5.0 years of service per executive, having 7.67 employees per reported executive. For ReTo Eco Solutions, management analysis can help investors test whether leadership decisions are reinforcing the broader investment thesis or creating new operating risk. Used properly, management analysis helps separate durable execution from results that may only reflect a supportive market cycle.
Hengfang Li  Chairman
Chairman of the Board, CEO
ReTo Eco has market cap of 2.92 M, P/E of 5.23, operating margin of -133.01%. Your Equity Center can help frame allocation decisions. The allocation includes a position in ReTo Eco Solutions inside the allocation mix. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators.

ReTo Eco Management Team Effectiveness

The company has return on total asset (ROA) of -8.33 % suggesting that asset deployment is not yet covering its cost of capital. This trails well behind sector averages. Similarly, it shows a return on stockholder's equity (ROE) of -38.33 %, meaning that equity holders received a negative return on their investment.
Per market data dated March 11, 2026, Common Stock Shares Outstanding is projected to contract toward approximately 356.3 K. In addition to that, Net Loss is projected to grow to approximately -12.5 M

ReTo Stock Ownership Analysis

The company has price-to-book ratio of 0.08. Typically companies with comparable Price to Book (P/B) are able to outperform the market in the long run. ReTo Eco Solutions recorded a loss per share of 507.54. The company had not issued any dividends in recent years. The firm completed a 1:5 stock split on 3rd of November 2025.
Reviewing share-based compensation in ReTo Eco Solutions helps investors understand how management balances employee incentives against dilution risk. Shares outstanding are near 1.9 M. That is why investors should compare compensation intensity with revenue growth, margin progress, and free-cash-flow generation.

ReTo Eco Quarterly Liabilities And Stockholders Equity

41.41 Million
Reviewing insider ownership in ReTo Eco Solutions helps investors understand how much of the equity base is controlled by people involved in running the business. Insiders currently hold about 8.16% of outstanding shares. Investors usually want to know whether that level supports alignment without creating excessive control risk. View all of ReTo Eco's insider trades

ReTo Stock Institutional Investors

Institutional ownership matters in ReTo Eco Solutions because pension funds, mutual funds, banks, and advisers can materially influence liquidity, governance, and price discovery. Used correctly, institutional data helps investors understand who may be setting the marginal price and how resilient that holder base could be under stress.
Shares
Citadel Advisors Llc2025-09-30
24.1 K
Ubs Group Ag2025-09-30
8.9 K
Sbi Securities Co Ltd2025-12-31
11.0
Morgan Stanley - Brokerage Accounts2025-09-30
1.0
A large institutional presence can look reassuring, but sophisticated ownership alone should not be mistaken for proof that a position is mispriced or low risk. Ownership data should therefore support due diligence rather than replace it.

ReTo Eco Outstanding Bonds

Reviewing ReTo Eco Solutions bond obligations helps investors understand how much of the business is financed with fixed-income capital rather than purely with equity. This is why bond analysis is not just a credit exercise; it also informs equity holders about solvency, optionality, and future capital-allocation pressure.
ReTo Eco displays a 8.16% of its outstanding shares held by insiders and 0.01% owned by institutional holders. Insider ownership stands at approximately 8% while institutional investors account for 0%, leaving 92% of the float in public hands.
 
Shares in Circulation  
 First Issued
2015-06-30
 Previous Quarter
M
 Current Value
M
 Average Shares Outstanding
692.1 M
 Quarterly Volatility
4.1 B
Macro event markers
 
Yuan Drop
 
Covid
 
Interest Hikes

ReTo Stock Holders Distribution

Institutional ownership analysis for ReTo Eco Solutions matters because banks, hedge funds, pension plans, and other professional investors can influence price and liquidity more forcefully than smaller holders. This matters because getting in early on a sponsorship cycle may help, but getting caught near a large-holder exit can have the opposite effect.

ReTo Eco Market Cap and Value

ReTo Eco Workforce Comparison

ReTo Eco Solutions is evaluated as fourth in Number Of Employees in number of employees category among its top compatitors. The total workforce of Materials industry is at this time estimated at about 23,594. ReTo Eco adds roughly 46.0 in number of employees claiming only tiny portion of all equities under Materials space.

ReTo Eco Solutions Benchmark Summation

Operator
The output start index for this execution was zero with a total number of output elements of sixty-one. ReTo Eco Solutions Price Series Summation is a cross summation of ReTo Eco price series and its benchmark/peer.

ReTo Eco Notable Stakeholders

Stakeholders matter for ReTo Eco because not every influential participant is a shareholder acting with the same objective or time horizon. This becomes more informative when investors want to understand not just ownership, but influence, incentives, and strategic pressure points.
Hengfang LiChairman of the Board, CEOProfile
Guangfeng DaiCOO, DirectorProfile
Zhizhong HuCTO, DirectorProfile
Degang HouChief OfficerProfile
Xinyang LiChief OfficerProfile
Yue HuChief OfficerProfile

About ReTo Eco Management

ReTo Eco Workforce Analysis

Investors reviewing ReTo Eco Solutions can use workforce efficiency as another lens on execution, especially when comparing similar businesses in the same industry. A disciplined workforce review can reveal whether execution quality is improving beneath the top-line numbers.

ReTo Eco Manpower Efficiency

Return on ReTo Eco Manpower

Revenue Per Employee39.8K
Revenue Per Executive304.8K
Net Loss Per Employee180.7K
Net Loss Per Executive1.4M

More Resources for ReTo Stock Analysis

A structured review of ReTo Eco Solutions often starts with core financial statements and trend context. Key ratios help frame profitability, efficiency, and growth context for ReTo Eco Solutions Stock. Highlighted below are reports that provide context for ReTo Eco Solutions Stock:
ReTo Eco has market cap of 2.92 M, P/E of 5.23, operating margin of -133.01%. Your Equity Center can help frame allocation decisions. The allocation includes a position in ReTo Eco Solutions inside the allocation mix. Also, note that the market value of any company could be closely tied with the direction of predictive economic indicators such as signals in main economic indicators.
Analysis related to ReTo Eco should be read together with other portfolio and risk tools before capital is reallocated. That is especially important when the goal is to improve the overall mix of instruments already held. You can also try the Idea Optimizer module to use advanced portfolio builder with pre-computed micro ideas to build optimal portfolio .
 Earnings Share
-507.54
 Revenue Per Share
6.343
 Quarterly Revenue Growth
0.366
 Return On Assets
-0.08
 Return On Equity
-0.38
Investors evaluate ReTo Eco Solutions using market value and book value, each describing different facets of the business. ReTo Eco's market capitalization is 2.92 M. A P/B ratio of 0.08 suggests ReTo Eco trades near or below book value. Enterprise value stands at 1.6 M. Intrinsic value is an estimate of what ReTo Eco's fundamentals imply, and it may differ from market and book figures. Analytical frameworks help compare those viewpoints.
Value and price for ReTo Eco are related but not identical, and they can diverge across cycles. For ReTo Eco, key inputs include a P/E ratio of 5.23, a P/B ratio of 0.08, ROE of -38.33%, and revenue of 1.83 M. By contrast, market price reflects the level where buyers and sellers transact.