Velo3D Competitors
| VELO Stock | USD 13.21 1.49 12.71% |
Velo3D vs Arrow Financial Correlation Summary
Strong inverse diversification
Velo3D currently posts a -0.47 correlation with Arrow Financial, indicating a Strong inverse diversification relationship for the active sample. In portfolio terms, the overlap shows how much shared movement remains after combining both positions.
Moving against Velo3D Stock
Statistical evidence for mean reversion in Velo3D's can be observed through its tendency to revert after extreme valuations. Investors who believe in mean reversion view Velo3D's price extremes as temporary dislocations that may self-correct. Valuation-driven investors use mean reversion to time Velo3D's investments around historical valuation multiples. Historical data for Velo3D shows that extreme valuations have tended to normalize over multi-year periods.
Velo3D Competition Correlation Matrix
Reviewing how Velo3D moves relative to competing stocks can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. Used correctly, correlation analysis helps separate broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.
| 0.12 | -0.61 | 0.61 | -0.47 | -0.65 | UBER | ||
| 0.12 | -0.59 | 0.33 | -0.39 | -0.27 | THG | ||
| -0.61 | -0.59 | -0.39 | 0.84 | 0.8 | WLFC | ||
| 0.61 | 0.33 | -0.39 | -0.31 | -0.15 | AAL | ||
| -0.47 | -0.39 | 0.84 | -0.31 | 0.59 | AQN | ||
| -0.65 | -0.27 | 0.8 | -0.15 | 0.59 | AROW | ||
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Velo3D Company may look attractive on headline returns alone, but deeper analysis often tells a different story. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Velo3D's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBER | 1.51 | -0.09 | 0.00 | -0.26 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 11.09 | |||
| THG | 0.83 | -0.13 | 0.00 | -1.33 | 0.00 | 1.71 | 4.54 | |||
| WLFC | 2.27 | 0.57 | 0.18 | 0.20 | 2.40 | 5.42 | 13.41 | |||
| AAL | 2.39 | -0.31 | 0.00 | -0.23 | 0.00 | 3.76 | 13.87 | |||
| AQN | 1.22 | 0.13 | 0.09 | 0.90 | 2.25 | 3.02 | 15.06 | |||
| AROW | 1.15 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 1.40 | 2.45 | 9.26 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Velo3D financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Velo3D operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Velo3D and related stocks such as Uber Technologies, Hanover Insurance, and Willis Lease Finance Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UBER | -2.7 B | -2.7 B | -2.7 B | -2.7 B | -2.7 B | -2.7 B | -370 M | -4 B | 997 M | -8.5 B | -6.8 B | -496 M | -9.1 B | 1.9 B | 9.9 B | 10.1 B | 10.6 B |
| THG | 133.9 M | 36.7 M | 55.9 M | 251 M | 282 M | 331.5 M | 155.1 M | 186.2 M | 391 M | 425.1 M | 358.7 M | 422.8 M | 116 M | 35.3 M | 426 M | 662.5 M | 695.6 M |
| WLFC | 3.2 M | 14.5 M | 1.5 M | 15.6 M | 7.2 M | 7.4 M | 14.1 M | 62.2 M | 43.2 M | 66.9 M | 9.7 M | 3.4 M | 5.4 M | 43.8 M | 108.6 M | 113.8 M | 119.4 M |
| AAL | 345.8 M | -2 B | -1.9 B | -1.8 B | 2.9 B | 7.6 B | 2.6 B | 1.3 B | 1.4 B | 1.7 B | -8.9 B | -2 B | 127 M | 822 M | 846 M | 111 M | 116.5 M |
| AQN | -1.7 M | 22.9 M | 14.6 M | 19.1 M | 65.2 M | 84.7 M | 97.4 M | 153.6 M | 185 M | 530.9 M | 782.5 M | 264.9 M | -212 M | 28.7 M | -1.4 B | 184.8 M | 194 M |
| AROW | 2.8 M | 21.9 M | 22.2 M | 21.8 M | 23.4 M | 24.7 M | 26.5 M | 29.3 M | 36.3 M | 37.5 M | 40.8 M | 49.9 M | 48.8 M | 30.1 M | 29.7 M | 44 M | 46.2 M |
Velo3D Competitive Analysis
A side-by-side look at Velo3D, Uber Technologies, Hanover Insurance, and Willis Lease highlights where each stock leads or lags. Velo3D enters the comparison at 103.9 M with 41.0 M in revenue. Profitability is a concern, with a -147.85% net margin and -224.17% return on equity signaling pressure on earnings. Velo3D is dwarfed by Uber Technologies on market cap at 153.53 B versus 103.9 M. Top-line revenue favors Hanover Insurance by a wide margin: 6.60 B to 41.0 M. Willis Lease leads with 18.95% return on equity versus -224.17% for Velo3D.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Velo3D Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Velo3D Against Peers
Velo3D's peer analysis compares Velo3D with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Velo3D trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Velo3D leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Velo3D's capital allocation track record stands out when measured by cumulative returns on acquisitions versus peers. Momentum scores across the peer set show which names are gaining relative strength and which are fading. Comparative analysis works best when peers share business drivers, cycle exposure, and capital structure characteristics. For peer comparison, Velo3D has a market cap of 103.93 M, P/E of 34.52, profit margin of -147.85%.
Unless otherwise specified, data for Velo3D is compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Sell-side coverage, where present, supplements the data shown. Updates may occur throughout the day.