TISCO Financial Competitors

TSCFY Pink Sheet  USD 30.50  0.00  0.00%   
The company classifies itself in the Banks—Regional industry (Financial Services sector). Within this framework, TISCO Financial Group is compared with NASB Financial, Mission Bancorp, Truxton, Cashmere Valley, and Merchants Financial, along with other selected peers. TISCO Financial margin trends reveal whether its pricing power is holding up against peers.

TISCO Financial and First Northern Correlation Snapshot

Specify up to 10 symbols:
Mean reversion is the tendency of TISCO Financial's price to return to its historical average after periods of extreme deviation. Some analysts monitor this tendency by comparing TISCO Financial's price extremes to fundamental value.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
30.5030.5030.50
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
30.5030.5030.50
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
30.5030.5030.50
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
30.5030.5030.50
Details
Competitive analysis for TISCO Financial compares its financial performance and valuation against sector peers. This relative perspective often changes investment conclusions drawn from standalone analysis.

TISCO Financial Competition Correlation Matrix

Correlation analysis between TISCO Financial Group and its competitors provides context for understanding whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. A reading near +1 usually means prices have moved in tandem, a reading near -1 suggests opposite movement, and a reading near zero points to weaker historical dependence.

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

Headline performance for TISCO Pink Sheet may not fully reflect how the business compares across its competitive set. Peer-relative risk metrics add context on drawdown behavior, consistency, and return quality. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.

TISCO Financial Competitive Analysis

To gauge TISCO Financial's financial strength, comparing it with NASB Financial, Mission Bancorp, and Truxton offers useful context. TISCO Financial is valued at 2.53 B and generates 19.27 B in revenue. A 17.20% return on equity and 40.99% net margin underscore TISCO Financial's earnings capacity. Top-line revenue favors TISCO Financial by a wide margin: 19.27 B to 129.3 M. TISCO Financial commands the larger valuation at 2.53 B versus 28.6 M. Earnings multiples split the pair: 99.64x for TISCO Financial against 15.77x for Truxton.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
TSCFY NASB MSBC TRUX FFBB CSHX MFGI FNRN
 0.00 
30.50
TISCO
 0.02 
40.99
NASB
 0.00 
100.50
Mission
 1.19 
85.00
Truxton
 0.58 
85.00
FFB
 0.01 
74.69
Cashmere
 0.00 
35.00
Merchants
 0.32 
15.80
First
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Net Asset
Profit Margin
EBITDA
Operating Margin
Current Valuation
Price To Book
Retained Earnings
Current Asset
Five Year Return
Beta
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Cash Flow From Operations
Annual Yield
Total Debt
Return On Equity
Z Score
Return On Asset
Book Value Per Share
Number Of Shares Shorted
Current Liabilities
Total Asset
Debt To Equity
Short Ratio
Target Price
Last Dividend Paid
Shares Owned By Institutions
Market Capitalization
Price To Earning
Price To Sales
Net Income
Earnings Per Share
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue
Working Capital
Cash And Equivalents
Cash Per Share
Gross Profit
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

TISCO Financial Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze TISCO Financial Against Peers

TISCO Financial's peer analysis compares TISCO Financial with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether TISCO Financial trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where TISCO Financial leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

TISCO Financial has a wider economic moat score than the average competitor, based on return spread and reinvestment patterns. All values are presented as reference data. Comparing mid-cap peers can help separate structural strengths from temporary momentum. For peer comparison, TISCO Financial has a market cap of 2.53 B, P/E of 99.64, profit margin of 40.99%.

TISCO Financial Group metrics are compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and normalized before display. Not all fields update in real time.

This content is curated and reviewed by:

Gabriel Shpitalnik - Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board
Last reviewed on March 24th, 2026