TransAct Technologies Competitors
| TACT Stock | USD 3.38 -0.10 -2.87% |
TransAct Technologies and The9 Correlation Overview
Poor diversification
Across the chosen horizon, TACT and NCTY show a correlation of 0.71 and fall into the Poor diversification bucket. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving together with TransAct Stock
Moving against TransAct Stock
The concept of mean reversion suggests that TransAct Technologies' price will eventually return toward its long-run average. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers who anticipate a recovery.
TransAct Technologies Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for TransAct Technologies Incorporated matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Evaluating TransAct Stock requires separating price momentum from underlying business quality relative to competitors. Without reviewing risk-adjusted indicators, investors may overweight recent returns and underweight the volatility required to achieve them. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTCC | 1.97 | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.23 | 2.20 | 5.42 | 12.28 | |||
| UBXG | 2.09 | -0.31 | 0.00 | -4.08 | 0.00 | 4.40 | 12.39 | |||
| ODYS | 3.54 | 0.90 | 0.23 | -1.61 | 3.43 | 8.47 | 30.76 | |||
| NUKK | 5.19 | -2.17 | 0.00 | -7.29 | 0.00 | 9.04 | 40.88 | |||
| NEON | 2.43 | -0.38 | 0.00 | -0.18 | 0.00 | 4.95 | 15.05 | |||
| PHUN | 2.58 | -0.33 | 0.00 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 6.18 | 14.60 | |||
| SLNH | 6.51 | -0.75 | 0.00 | -0.16 | 0.00 | 17.32 | 44.68 | |||
| MKTW | 2.04 | -0.14 | 0.00 | -0.16 | 0.00 | 4.01 | 13.87 | |||
| MFI | 3.70 | -0.64 | 0.00 | -7.61 | 0.00 | 7.58 | 23.83 | |||
| NCTY | 3.59 | -0.09 | 0.00 | -0.06 | 0.00 | 10.24 | 24.71 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in TransAct Technologies financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of TransAct Technologies Incorporated operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare TransAct Technologies and related stocks such as Key Tronic, U BX Technology, and Odysightai Common Stock Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KTCC | 600 K | 11.6 M | 12.6 M | 7.6 M | 4.3 M | 6.5 M | 5.6 M | -1.3 M | -8 M | 4.8 M | 4.3 M | 3.4 M | 5.2 M | -2.8 M | -8.3 M | -9.6 M | -9.1 M |
| UBXG | -246.8 K | -246.8 K | -246.8 K | -246.8 K | -246.8 K | -246.8 K | -246.8 K | -246.8 K | -246.8 K | -246.8 K | -9.6 K | -49 K | 205.9 K | -748.5 K | -2.7 M | -2.4 M | -2.3 M |
| NEON | 500 K | -17.1 M | -9.3 M | -13.1 M | -14.2 M | -7.8 M | -5.3 M | -4.7 M | -3.1 M | -5.3 M | -5.6 M | -6.5 M | -4.9 M | -10.1 M | -6.5 M | -5.8 M | -6.1 M |
| PHUN | -90.2 K | -90.2 K | -90.2 K | -90.2 K | -90.2 K | -90.2 K | -90.2 K | -25.9 M | -9.8 M | -12.9 M | -22.2 M | -53.5 M | -50.9 M | -52.8 M | -10.3 M | -9.3 M | -9.7 M |
| SLNH | 1.3 M | 2.4 M | -2.1 M | 3.7 M | 740 K | -2.8 M | -359 K | 582 K | 1.9 M | 323 K | 1.9 M | -5.3 M | -98.7 M | -29.2 M | -63.3 M | -57 M | -54.2 M |
| MKTW | 18.6 M | 18.6 M | 18.6 M | 18.6 M | 18.6 M | 18.6 M | 18.6 M | 18.6 M | 18.6 M | 28 M | -538.4 M | -1 B | 18 M | 1.8 M | 7.1 M | 5.6 M | 5.9 M |
| MFI | 20.9 M | 9 M | 9.4 M | 9.8 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 11.7 M | 10.3 M | 6.8 M | 6.6 M | -20.2 M | -18.2 M | -17.3 M |
| NCTY | -16 M | -284.3 M | -514 M | -526.3 M | -86.6 M | -304.8 M | -593.8 M | -118.2 M | -217.1 M | -196.2 M | 397.9 M | -411.2 M | -974.9 M | 20 M | -73.4 M | -66.1 M | -69.4 M |
TransAct Technologies Competitive Analysis
TransAct Technologies' competitive standing becomes clearer when measured alongside Key Tronic, U BX, and Nukkleus. With 51.5 M in revenue and a 34.2 M market value, TransAct Technologies anchors one end of the peer spectrum. The -4.02% return on equity and -2.41% profit margin point to near-term profitability challenges for TransAct Technologies. Top-line revenue favors Key Tronic by a wide margin: 467.9 M to 51.5 M. On equity returns, TransAct Technologies earns -4.02% compared to -16.53% at U BX. Market capitalization diverges sharply here: 52.0 M versus 34.2 M, giving Nukkleus a clear size advantage.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
TransAct Technologies Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze TransAct Technologies Against Peers
TransAct Technologies' peer analysis compares TransAct Technologies with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether TransAct Technologies trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where TransAct Technologies leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Peer analysis for TransAct Technologies rewards breadth of comparison over narrow single-company analysis - the more peer context incorporated, the sharper the relative assessment becomes. Peer benchmarking can improve context for valuation without relying only on standalone multiples. For peer comparison, TransAct Technologies has a market cap of 34.18 M, P/E of 58.41, profit margin of -2.41%.
For TransAct Technologies Incorporated, this section uses periodic company reporting and market reference feeds with Macroaxis normalization rules applied to keep cross-asset comparisons consistent. Where analyst coverage exists, consensus estimates are factored in. Intraday timing differences may exist.