Supercom Competitors
| SPCB Stock | USD 8.28 0.06 0.73% |
Supercom vs Flux Power Correlation Details
Excellent diversification
The correlation between Supercom and Flux Power is -0.02, which Macroaxis classifies as Excellent diversification for the selected horizon. In portfolio terms, the overlap shows how much shared movement remains after combining both positions.
Moving against Supercom Stock
Experienced investors tracking Supercom's watch for mean reversion setups where price has deviated from its long-run average. Sentiment extremes, news events, or liquidity shocks are common catalysts for these temporary dislocations in Supercom. Prices periodically overshoot their intrinsic value in both directions, creating mean reversion opportunities in Supercom. The mean reversion signal is most useful when combined with fundamental confirmation for Supercom's.
Supercom Competition Correlation Matrix
Reviewing how Supercom moves relative to competing stocks can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Evaluating Supercom Stock requires separating price momentum from underlying business quality relative to competitors. Without reviewing risk-adjusted indicators, investors may overweight recent returns and underweight the volatility required to achieve them. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KSCP | 3.77 | 0.11 | 0.07 | -0.25 | 3.87 | 9.43 | 31.13 | |||
| ADSE | 2.72 | -0.10 | 0.00 | -0.33 | 0.00 | 4.13 | 16.28 | |||
| RYOJ | 3.82 | -0.62 | 0.00 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 6.92 | 33.82 | |||
| GPUS | 5.72 | -0.11 | 0.00 | 0.27 | 0.00 | 11.76 | 62.50 | |||
| MESA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| XOS | 3.31 | -0.06 | 0.04 | -0.05 | 4.01 | 7.58 | 38.89 | |||
| MAGH | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| DPRO | 4.79 | -0.30 | 0.00 | -0.62 | 0.00 | 10.34 | 31.67 | |||
| NIXXW | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| FLUX | 4.76 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 5.23 | 13.45 | 31.70 |
Supercom Competitive Analysis
Supercom's competitive standing becomes clearer when measured alongside Knightscope, Ads Tec, and RYojbaba. With 27.6 M in revenue and a 38.8 M market value, Supercom anchors one end of the peer spectrum. Shareholders see a 15.34% return on equity, supported by a 15.53% profit margin. Profit margins tilt toward Supercom at 15.53% against Knightscope at -256.09%. Supercom converts shareholder equity more efficiently at 15.34% versus Ads Tec at -282.35%. Supercom leads on revenue, 27.6 M to 11.5 M.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Supercom Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Supercom Against Peers
Supercom's peer analysis compares Supercom with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Supercom trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Supercom leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Dividend growth at Supercom has outpaced most competitors, suggesting management sees durable cash flow ahead. Working capital efficiency at Supercom relative to peers can flag hidden liquidity strengths or weaknesses. Peer benchmarking can improve context for valuation without relying only on standalone multiples. For peer comparison, Supercom has a market cap of 38.78 M, profit margin of 15.53%.
For Supercom, this section uses periodic company reporting and market reference feeds with Macroaxis normalization rules applied to keep cross-asset comparisons consistent. Intraday timing differences may exist.