Solid Power Competitors
| SLDP Stock | USD 3.16 0.04 1.28% |
Solid Power vs Resolute Holdings Correlation Snapshot
Poor diversification
SLDP currently posts a 0.73 correlation with RHLD, indicating a Poor diversification relationship for the active sample. The cleaner interpretation is to review correlation beside volatility, expected return, and the role each holding plays in the portfolio.
Moving against Solid Stock
The concept of mean reversion suggests that Solid Power's price will eventually return toward its long-run average. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers who anticipate a recovery.
Solid Power Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for Solid Power matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. The useful question is whether competitors are behaving like true alternatives or simply tracking the same sector move with different volatility.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Evaluating Solid Stock requires separating price momentum from underlying business quality relative to competitors. Without reviewing risk-adjusted indicators, investors may overweight recent returns and underweight the volatility required to achieve them. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVLV | 2.65 | -0.22 | 0.00 | -0.29 | 0.00 | 5.15 | 21.35 | |||
| PLPC | 2.47 | 0.38 | 0.10 | 0.13 | 3.14 | 4.31 | 14.23 | |||
| EOSE | 5.34 | -0.92 | 0.00 | -0.40 | 0.00 | 10.60 | 52.62 | |||
| ALGT | 2.69 | 0.18 | 0.00 | -0.02 | 0.00 | 5.41 | 24.10 | |||
| EVEX | 2.55 | -0.74 | 0.00 | -0.43 | 0.00 | 4.95 | 20.79 | |||
| PRG | 1.93 | 0.02 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 3.99 | 18.75 | |||
| RDW | 6.47 | 1.02 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 6.28 | 14.09 | 41.99 | |||
| GSL | 1.31 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 7.64 | 1.57 | 2.60 | 7.31 | |||
| BLDP | 2.51 | 0.03 | 0.00 | -0.06 | 0.00 | 5.91 | 15.17 | |||
| RHLD | 4.34 | 0.04 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 8.69 | 35.10 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Solid Power financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Solid Power operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Solid Power and related stocks such as Evolv Technologies, Preformed Line Products, and Eos Energy Enterprises Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVLV | -19.9 M | -19.9 M | -19.9 M | -19.9 M | -19.9 M | -19.9 M | -19.9 M | -19.9 M | -19.9 M | -19.9 M | -27.4 M | -10.9 M | -86.8 M | -106.3 M | -54 M | -33.1 M | -34.8 M |
| PLPC | 11.1 M | 31 M | 29.3 M | 20.6 M | 12.9 M | 6.7 M | 15.3 M | 12.7 M | 26.6 M | 23.3 M | 29.8 M | 35.7 M | 54.4 M | 63.3 M | 37.1 M | 35.3 M | 24.1 M |
| EOSE | -28.5 M | -28.5 M | -28.5 M | -28.5 M | -28.5 M | -28.5 M | -28.5 M | -28.5 M | -28.5 M | -79.5 M | -67.2 M | -124.2 M | -229.8 M | -229.5 M | -685.9 M | -969.6 M | -921.2 M |
| ALGT | -1.3 M | 49.4 M | 78.6 M | 92.3 M | 86.7 M | 220.4 M | 219.6 M | 194.9 M | 161.8 M | 232.1 M | -184.1 M | 151.9 M | 2.5 M | 117.6 M | -240.2 M | -44.7 M | -42.5 M |
| EVEX | -5 M | -5 M | -5 M | -5 M | -5 M | -5 M | -5 M | -5 M | -5 M | -7.7 M | -16.7 M | -18.3 M | -174 M | -127.7 M | -138.2 M | -224.3 M | -213 M |
| PRG | 5.8 M | 113.8 M | 173 M | 120.7 M | 78.2 M | 135.7 M | 139.3 M | 292.5 M | 196.2 M | 31.5 M | -61.5 M | 243.6 M | 98.7 M | 138.8 M | 197.2 M | 146.8 M | 79 M |
| RDW | -3.4 M | -3.4 M | -3.4 M | -3.4 M | -3.4 M | -3.4 M | -3.4 M | -3.4 M | -3.4 M | -3.4 M | -39.7 K | -61.5 M | -130.6 M | -27.3 M | -114.3 M | -226.6 M | -215.2 M |
| GSL | 32.7 M | 9.1 M | 31.9 M | 32.5 M | 6.1 M | -28.9 M | -65.1 M | -74.3 M | -57.4 M | 39.8 M | 41.6 M | 171.5 M | 292.9 M | 304.5 M | 353.6 M | 416.5 M | 437.3 M |
| BLDP | -2.3 M | -33.4 M | -42.1 M | -20 M | -27.9 M | -5.8 M | -21.7 M | -8 M | -27.3 M | -39 M | -51.4 M | -114.4 M | -173.5 M | -177.7 M | -324.2 M | -92.5 M | -97.1 M |
| RHLD | 3.2 M | 3.2 M | 3.2 M | 3.2 M | 3.2 M | 3.2 M | 3.2 M | 3.2 M | 3.2 M | 3.2 M | 3.2 M | 3.2 M | 102.7 M | -3.2 M | 110.3 M | 135.8 M | 76.7 M |
Solid Power Competitive Analysis
Solid Power's competitive standing becomes clearer when measured alongside Evolv Technologies, Preformed Line, and Eos Energy. With 21.7 M in revenue and a 688.2 M market value, Solid Power anchors one end of the peer spectrum. Solid Power posts a -22.62% return on equity, reflecting current earnings headwinds. Evolv Technologies leads on revenue, 145.9 M to 21.7 M, a substantial gap. Return on equity favors Preformed Line at 8.34%, well ahead of Solid Power at -22.62%. On pure scale, Eos Energy is the bigger entity with market caps of 1.79 B versus 688.2 M.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Solid Power Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Solid Power Against Peers
Solid Power's peer analysis compares Solid Power with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Solid Power trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Solid Power leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Analyzing Solid Power's peers expands diversification context, relative positioning, and sector theme understanding. Debt-to-equity comparison across Solid Power's peers frames whether its leverage is conservative, normal, or elevated for its industry. Sector classification alone can be too broad, so Solid Power's peer group benefits from business model filtering. Peer benchmarking can improve context for valuation without relying only on standalone multiples. For peer comparison, Solid Power has a market cap of 688.2 M, P/E of 27.39.
For Solid Power, this section uses periodic company reporting and market reference feeds with Macroaxis normalization rules applied to keep cross-asset comparisons consistent. Sell-side coverage, where present, supplements the data shown. Intraday timing differences may exist.