SC II Competitors
| SCIIU Stock | 10.30 0.03 0.29% |
SC II and Westin Acquisition Correlation View
Poor diversification
SCIIU currently posts a 0.75 correlation with WSTNU, indicating a Poor diversification relationship for the active sample. Used correctly, the chart supports evaluation of whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
Moving together with SCIIU Stock
Moving against SCIIU Stock
The mean reversion principle applied to SC II's suggests that neither prolonged outperformance nor underperformance is permanent. Investors exploit this by positioning against extremes in price relative to fundamental value.
SC II Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between SC II Acquisition and its competitors provides context for understanding whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. A reading near +1 usually means prices have moved in tandem, a reading near -1 suggests opposite movement, and a reading near zero points to weaker historical dependence.
| -0.23 | 0.0 | -0.24 | 0.56 | -0.35 | CCIXU | ||
| -0.23 | 0.0 | 0.66 | -0.58 | 0.66 | DYOR | ||
| 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | HCACU | ||
| -0.24 | 0.66 | 0.0 | -0.63 | 0.59 | LAFAU | ||
| 0.56 | -0.58 | 0.0 | -0.63 | -0.67 | WLAC | ||
| -0.35 | 0.66 | 0.0 | 0.59 | -0.67 | WSTNU | ||
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between SCIIU Stock performing well and SC II Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. Risk-adjusted metrics allow investors to compare SC II's efficiency and downside exposure against peers in a more meaningful way. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCIXU | 0.40 | -0.04 | 0.00 | -2.25 | 0.00 | 0.47 | 15.34 | |||
| DYOR | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.61 | -0.17 | 0.00 | 0.20 | 0.50 | |||
| HCACU | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| LAFAU | 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.17 | -0.62 | 0.39 | 0.69 | 2.96 | |||
| WLAC | 1.07 | -0.06 | 0.00 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 6.54 | |||
| WSTNU | 0.16 | 0.01 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.25 | 0.30 | 3.95 |
SC II Competitive Analysis
How does SC II measure up against Insight Digital, Hennessy Capital, and LaFayette Acquisition? The financials tell a nuanced story. The company holds a 155.6 M market capitalization. On pure scale, Insight Digital is the bigger entity with market caps of 229.1 M versus 155.6 M. Hennessy Capital holds the larger valuation at 882.7 M versus 155.6 M. On pure scale, SC II is the larger business with market caps of 155.6 M versus 137.8 M.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
SC II Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze SC II Against Peers
SC II's peer analysis compares SC II with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether SC II trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where SC II leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
The competition view for SC II includes correlation data, showing which peers are financially similar and which ones move together in the market. Valuation premiums or discounts for SC II become more meaningful when measured against the peer group rather than in isolation. Operating metrics that look strong for SC II in isolation may appear average or below average in peer context. Relative analysis can highlight whether current pricing already reflects peer-group strengths or weaknesses. For peer comparison, SC II has a market cap of 155.6 M.
Inputs for SC II Acquisition come from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and are mapped into a consistent schema for analysis. Some fields can appear with publication lag.