Service International Competitors
| SCI Stock | USD 75.43 -0.42 -0.55% |
Service International vs Carriage Services Correlation Snapshot
Poor diversification
The correlation between Service International and Carriage Services is 0.75, which Macroaxis classifies as Poor diversification for the selected horizon. Lower overlap tends to improve diversification, while higher overlap means both positions carry similar risk.
Moving against Service Stock
Experienced investors tracking Service International's watch for mean reversion setups where price has deviated from its long-run average. Sentiment extremes, news events, or liquidity shocks are common catalysts for these temporary dislocations in Service International. Prices periodically overshoot their intrinsic value in both directions, creating mean reversion opportunities in Service International. The mean reversion signal is most useful when combined with fundamental confirmation for Service International's.
Service International Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for Service International matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. Used correctly, correlation analysis helps separate broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Evaluating Service Stock requires separating price momentum from underlying business quality relative to competitors. Without reviewing risk-adjusted indicators, investors may overweight recent returns and underweight the volatility required to achieve them. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SN | 1.91 | -0.23 | 0.00 | -0.86 | 0.00 | 3.28 | 13.34 | |||
| CCK | 1.16 | -0.09 | 0.00 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 2.96 | 7.17 | |||
| TXRH | 1.22 | -0.01 | 0.00 | -0.15 | 0.00 | 2.67 | 5.89 | |||
| DECK | 1.84 | -0.03 | 0.05 | -0.03 | 1.97 | 3.85 | 23.73 | |||
| HTHT | 1.57 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.14 | 1.88 | 2.84 | 8.90 | |||
| BALL | 1.08 | 0.19 | 0.20 | 0.39 | 1.08 | 2.12 | 12.24 | |||
| NCLH | 2.78 | -0.30 | 0.00 | -1.17 | 0.00 | 7.47 | 22.67 | |||
| CART | 1.91 | -0.36 | 0.00 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 3.56 | 12.65 | |||
| PAG | 1.20 | -0.26 | 0.00 | 1.37 | 0.00 | 2.62 | 8.71 | |||
| CSV | 1.07 | -0.04 | 0.00 | -1.14 | 0.00 | 2.07 | 5.58 |
Service International Competitive Analysis
Service International's competitive standing becomes clearer when measured alongside SharkNinja, Crown Holdings, and Texas Roadhouse. With 4.31 B in revenue and a 10.57 B market value, Service International anchors one end of the peer spectrum. Shareholders see a 32.73% return on equity, supported by a 12.59% profit margin. SharkNinja pulls in 6.40 B in revenue while Service International reports 4.31 B. On the bottom line, Service International retains 12.59% while Crown Holdings manages 5.97%. Valuation multiples differ: Texas Roadhouse at 87.63x P/E versus Service International at 18.78x, suggesting different growth expectations.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Service International Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Service International Against Peers
Service International's peer analysis compares Service International with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Service International trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Service International leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Service International's beta is lower than the peer group average, meaning its stock tends to swing less during broad market moves. Peer benchmarking can improve context for valuation without relying only on standalone multiples. For peer comparison, Service International has a market cap of 10.57 B, P/E of 18.78, profit margin of 12.59%.
For Service International, this section uses periodic company reporting and market reference feeds with Macroaxis normalization rules applied to keep cross-asset comparisons consistent. Intraday timing differences may exist.