Rogers Competitors
| ROG Stock | USD 102.48 -0.64 -0.62% |
Rogers and Meridianlink Correlation Snapshot
Very weak diversification
The correlation between ROG and MLNK is 0.59, which Macroaxis classifies as Very weak diversification for the selected horizon. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
Moving together with Rogers Stock
Moving against Rogers Stock
Investors who believe in mean reversion view Rogers' price extremes not as permanent states but as temporary dislocations that create opportunities for disciplined, contrarian capital allocation.
Rogers Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Rogers and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Rogers Stock performing well and Rogers Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Rogers' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHE | 1.65 | 0.27 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 1.81 | 3.97 | 8.13 | |||
| OUST | 4.11 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.04 | 0.00 | 8.44 | 21.10 | |||
| VYX | 2.63 | -0.45 | 0.00 | -0.26 | 0.00 | 4.67 | 14.53 | |||
| PAR | 3.85 | -0.96 | 0.00 | -0.40 | 0.00 | 6.06 | 35.11 | |||
| CTS | 1.52 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 2.02 | 3.08 | 11.37 | |||
| KDK | 3.13 | 0.42 | 0.14 | 1.82 | 3.15 | 6.79 | 20.14 | |||
| ALIT | 3.28 | -0.95 | 0.00 | -0.52 | 0.00 | 5.88 | 44.05 | |||
| PLAB | 3.98 | 0.82 | 0.16 | 0.15 | 4.06 | 8.29 | 56.66 | |||
| CNXN | 1.25 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 1.52 | 3.28 | 13.04 | |||
| MLNK | 0.90 | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.84 | 0.15 | 1.15 | 25.01 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Rogers financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Rogers operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Rogers and related stocks such as Benchmark Electronics, Ouster Common Stock, and NCR Voyix Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BHE | 1.4 M | 52 M | 56.6 M | 111.2 M | 82.4 M | 95.4 M | 64 M | -32 M | 22.8 M | 23.4 M | 14.1 M | 35.8 M | 68.2 M | 64.3 M | 63.3 M | 24.9 M | 36.8 M |
| OUST | -32.8 M | -32.8 M | -32.8 M | -32.8 M | -32.8 M | -32.8 M | -32.8 M | -32.8 M | -32.8 M | -51.7 M | -106.8 M | -94 M | -138.6 M | -374.1 M | -97 M | -60.4 M | -63.4 M |
| VYX | -2.3 B | -190 M | 481 M | 443 M | 191 M | -178 M | 270 M | 232 M | -88 M | 564 M | -79 M | 97 M | 60 M | -423 M | 958 M | 42 M | 39.9 M |
| PAR | 8.1 M | -15.5 M | -315 K | 358 K | -3.7 M | -891 K | 1.8 M | -3.4 M | -24.1 M | -15.6 M | -36.6 M | -75.8 M | -69.3 M | -69.8 M | -5 M | -84.5 M | -80.2 M |
| CTS | 9.4 M | 21 M | 20.3 M | 1.2 M | 26.5 M | 7 M | 34.4 M | 14.4 M | 46.5 M | 36.1 M | 34.7 M | -41.9 M | 59.6 M | 60.5 M | 58.1 M | 65.3 M | 68.6 M |
| KDK | -56.9 M | -56.9 M | -56.9 M | -56.9 M | -56.9 M | -56.9 M | -56.9 M | -56.9 M | -56.9 M | -56.9 M | -56.9 M | -56.9 M | -56.9 M | -56.9 M | -69.5 M | -585.5 M | -556.2 M |
| ALIT | 126 M | 126 M | 126 M | 126 M | 126 M | 126 M | 126 M | 24 M | -21 M | 22 M | -103 M | -60 M | -62 M | -345 M | -157 M | -3.1 B | -2.9 B |
| PLAB | 1.1 M | 27.9 M | 18 M | 26 M | 44.6 M | 46.2 M | 13.1 M | 42.1 M | 40.5 M | 33.8 M | 55.4 M | 118.8 M | 125.5 M | 130.7 M | 136.4 M | 156.9 M | 164.7 M |
| CNXN | 5.2 M | 28.8 M | 33.1 M | 35.7 M | 42.7 M | 46.8 M | 48.1 M | 54.9 M | 64.6 M | 82.1 M | 55.8 M | 69.9 M | 89.2 M | 83.3 M | 87.1 M | 83.7 M | 87.9 M |
Rogers Competitive Analysis
Sizing up Rogers against Benchmark Electronics, Ouster Common, and NCR Voyix reveals meaningful differences in scale and efficiency. At a 1.83 B valuation, Rogers brings in 810.8 M on the top line. With a -5.05% return on equity and -7.62% net margin, Rogers faces a more difficult earnings environment than some peers. Profit margins tilt toward Benchmark Electronics at 0.94% against Rogers at -7.62%. Rogers converts shareholder equity more efficiently at -5.05% versus Ouster Common at -27.28%. NCR Voyix pulls in 2.69 B in revenue while the other reports 810.8 M.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Rogers Against Peers
Rogers' peer analysis compares Rogers with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Rogers trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Rogers leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.