Richardson Competitors
| RELL Stock | USD 11.31 -0.03 -0.26% |
Correlation: Richardson Electronics vs Expensify View
Very good diversification
The correlation between RELL and EXFY is -0.5, which Macroaxis classifies as Very good diversification for the selected horizon. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
Moving together with Richardson Stock
Moving against Richardson Stock
The mean reversion effect in Richardson Electronics is stronger when the initial deviation was driven by sentiment rather than fundamental change. Identifying the root cause of Richardson Electronics' price dislocation is essential before acting.
Richardson Electronics Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Richardson Electronics and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Richardson Stock performing well and Richardson Electronics Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Richardson Electronics' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPTI | 2.13 | 0.36 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 2.27 | 4.28 | 17.25 | |||
| KULR | 4.92 | -0.06 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 10.94 | 30.96 | |||
| WRAP | 4.84 | -0.15 | 0.00 | -0.10 | 0.00 | 8.89 | 43.99 | |||
| SATL | 7.25 | 1.42 | 0.19 | 0.55 | 6.89 | 19.93 | 47.02 | |||
| ZEPP | 4.54 | -0.31 | 0.00 | -0.23 | 0.00 | 8.73 | 39.55 | |||
| STEM | 4.24 | -0.51 | 0.00 | -0.24 | 0.00 | 8.29 | 31.83 | |||
| ARAI | 4.30 | -1.77 | 0.00 | -0.55 | 0.00 | 6.40 | 29.79 | |||
| TTEC | 3.87 | -0.17 | 0.00 | -0.14 | 0.00 | 8.68 | 22.32 | |||
| HIT | 4.86 | 0.77 | 0.16 | 3.06 | 4.41 | 14.08 | 30.57 | |||
| EXFY | 2.93 | -0.82 | 0.00 | -0.55 | 0.00 | 4.92 | 32.71 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Richardson Electronics financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Richardson Electronics operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Richardson Electronics and related stocks such as M tron Industries, KULR Technology Group, and Wrap Technologies Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPTI | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 2.3 M | 1.6 M | 1.8 M | 3.5 M | 7.6 M | 8.8 M | 9.2 M |
| KULR | -674.6 K | -674.6 K | -674.6 K | -674.6 K | -674.6 K | -674.6 K | -35 K | -2.4 M | -2.1 M | -2 M | -2.9 M | -11.9 M | -19.4 M | -23.7 M | -17.5 M | -15.8 M | -15 M |
| WRAP | -281.2 K | -281.2 K | -281.2 K | -281.2 K | -281.2 K | -281.2 K | -281.2 K | -833.5 K | -3.3 M | -8.3 M | -12.6 M | -24.4 M | -17.6 M | -30.2 M | -5.9 M | -5.3 M | -5.6 M |
| SATL | -20.8 M | -20.8 M | -20.8 M | -20.8 M | -20.8 M | -20.8 M | -20.8 M | -20.8 M | -20.8 M | -20.8 M | -21.5 M | -96.3 M | -36.6 M | -61 M | -116.3 M | -104.6 M | -99.4 M |
| ZEPP | -39.1 M | -39.1 M | -39.1 M | -39.1 M | -39.1 M | -39.1 M | 25 M | 163.5 M | 353.3 M | 573.6 M | 216.3 M | 136 M | -293.4 M | -220.5 M | -554.1 M | -498.7 M | -473.8 M |
| STEM | -8.1 K | -8.1 K | -8.1 K | -8.1 K | -8.1 K | -8.1 K | -8.1 K | -8.1 K | -8.1 K | -59.4 M | -156.1 M | -101.2 M | -124.1 M | -140.4 M | -854 M | 137.8 M | 144.6 M |
| ARAI | -1.5 M | -1.5 M | -1.5 M | -1.5 M | -1.5 M | -1.5 M | -1.5 M | -1.5 M | -1.5 M | -1.5 M | -1.5 M | -1.5 M | -2.4 M | -7.3 M | -4.5 M | -4.1 M | -4.3 M |
| TTEC | 13.8 M | 74.2 M | 70 M | 67.4 M | 72.3 M | 61.7 M | 33.7 M | 7.3 M | 35.8 M | 77.2 M | 118.6 M | 141 M | 103.2 M | 8.4 M | -321 M | -192.5 M | -182.8 M |
| HIT | 79.7 K | 79.7 K | 79.7 K | 79.7 K | 79.7 K | 79.7 K | 79.7 K | 79.7 K | 79.7 K | 79.7 K | 79.7 K | 79.7 K | 79.7 K | 2.5 M | 670.5 K | 771 K | 1.2 M |
| EXFY | 1.2 M | 1.2 M | 1.2 M | 1.2 M | 1.2 M | 1.2 M | 1.2 M | 1.2 M | 1.2 M | 1.2 M | -1.7 M | -13.6 M | -27 M | -41.5 M | -10.1 M | -21.4 M | -22.5 M |
Richardson Electronics Competitive Analysis
Placing Richardson Electronics in context against its competitive peers gives investors a deeper understanding of its investment appeal. Richardson Electronics' relative strengths and weaknesses become far clearer when measured against comparable companies in the sector.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Richardson Electronics Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Richardson Electronics Against Peers
Richardson Electronics' peer analysis compares Richardson Electronics with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Richardson Electronics trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Richardson Electronics leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.