Martin Marietta Competitors
| MLM Stock | USD 582.50 -2.81 -0.48% |
Pair Correlation for Martin Marietta and ArcelorMittal View
Poor diversification
The correlation between MLM and MT is 0.61, which Macroaxis classifies as Poor diversification for the selected horizon. This matters because lower overlap can improve diversification, while higher overlap leaves more of the same risk inside the portfolio.
Moving against Martin Stock
The mean reversion effect in Martin Marietta is stronger when the initial deviation was driven by sentiment rather than fundamental change. Identifying the root cause of Martin Marietta's price dislocation is essential before acting.
Martin Marietta Competition Correlation Matrix
Reviewing how Martin Marietta Materials moves relative to competing stocks can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. A reading near +1 usually means prices have moved in tandem, a reading near -1 suggests opposite movement, and a reading near zero points to weaker historical dependence.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Martin Marietta Company may look attractive on headline returns alone, but deeper analysis often tells a different story. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Martin Marietta's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMC | 1.46 | -0.11 | 0.00 | -0.14 | 0.00 | 2.40 | 11.94 | |||
| AMRZ | 1.85 | 0.08 | 0.06 | -0.21 | 2.17 | 3.71 | 16.51 | |||
| FNV | 1.87 | 0.39 | 0.11 | 0.30 | 3.08 | 3.86 | 14.34 | |||
| NUE | 1.37 | 0.03 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 3.29 | 7.46 | |||
| CTVA | 1.03 | 0.34 | 0.24 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 2.32 | 7.26 | |||
| GFI | 2.94 | 0.30 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 4.67 | 6.28 | 23.46 | |||
| AU | 2.85 | 0.38 | 0.08 | 0.26 | 4.62 | 6.02 | 21.10 | |||
| WPM | 2.36 | 0.40 | 0.08 | 0.24 | 4.12 | 4.63 | 18.32 | |||
| JHX | 1.70 | 0.12 | 0.04 | 0.03 | 2.02 | 4.19 | 11.16 | |||
| MT | 2.05 | 0.30 | 0.11 | -6.26 | 2.73 | 4.72 | 14.67 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Martin Marietta Materials financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Martin Marietta Materials operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Martin Marietta Materials and related stocks such as Vulcan Materials, Amrize, and Franco Nevada Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VMC | 71.3 M | -70.8 M | -52.6 M | 24.4 M | 204.9 M | 221.2 M | 419.5 M | 601.2 M | 515.8 M | 617.7 M | 584.5 M | 670.8 M | 575.6 M | 933.2 M | 911.9 M | 1.1 B | 1.1 B |
| AMRZ | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 841 M | 1.1 B | 956 M | 1.4 B | 1.2 B | 1.2 B |
| FNV | -33.1 M | -6.8 M | 102.6 M | 11.7 M | 106.7 M | 24.6 M | 122.2 M | 194.7 M | 131.9 M | 352.1 M | 343.4 M | 727.2 M | 672.8 M | -466.4 M | 552.1 M | 1.1 B | 1.2 B |
| NUE | 58.5 M | 778.2 M | 504.6 M | 488 M | 713.9 M | 357.7 M | 796.3 M | 1.3 B | 2.4 B | 1.3 B | 721.5 M | 6.8 B | 7.6 B | 4.5 B | 2 B | 1.7 B | 1.1 B |
| CTVA | 503 M | 503 M | 503 M | 503 M | 503 M | 503 M | 503 M | 2.5 B | -5.1 B | -959 M | 681 M | 1.8 B | 1.1 B | 735 M | 907 M | 1.1 B | 1.1 B |
| GFI | 188 M | 881.5 M | 654.3 M | -583.6 M | 12.8 M | -239.1 M | 157 M | -31.8 M | -348.2 M | 161.6 M | 723 M | 789.3 M | 711 M | 703.3 M | 1.2 B | 3.6 B | 3.8 B |
| AU | 49.9 M | 1.4 B | 829 M | -2 B | -74 M | 31 M | 63 M | 145 M | 216 M | -7 M | 1 B | 614 M | 233 M | -235 M | 1 B | 2.6 B | 2.8 B |
| WPM | 6.6 K | 550 M | 586 M | 375.5 M | 199.8 M | -162 M | 195.1 M | 57.7 M | 427.1 M | 86.1 M | 507.8 M | 754.9 M | 669.1 M | 537.6 M | 529.1 M | 1.5 B | 1.6 B |
| JHX | 96.1 M | 604.3 M | 45.5 M | 99.5 M | 291.3 M | 244.4 M | 276.5 M | 146.1 M | 228.8 M | 241.5 M | 262.8 M | 459.1 M | 512 M | 510.2 M | 424 M | 487.6 M | 512 M |
| MT | 289 M | 2.3 B | -3.7 B | -2.5 B | -1.1 B | -7.9 B | 1.8 B | 4.6 B | 5.1 B | -2.5 B | -733 M | 15 B | 9.3 B | 919 M | 1.3 B | 3.2 B | 2.3 B |
Martin Marietta Competitive Analysis
A side-by-side look at Martin Marietta, Vulcan Materials, Amrize, and Franco Nevada highlights where each stock leads or lags. Martin Marietta enters the comparison at 35.13 B with 6.54 B in revenue. Profitability stands at a 18.49% net margin with return on equity reaching 10.16%. Earnings multiples split the pair: 41.82x for Vulcan Materials against 27.89x for Martin Marietta. Profit margins tilt toward Martin Marietta at 18.49% against Amrize at 10.03%. Martin Marietta leads on revenue, 6.54 B to 1.85 B, a substantial gap.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Martin Marietta Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Martin Marietta Against Peers
Martin Marietta's peer analysis compares Martin Marietta with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Martin Marietta trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Martin Marietta leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Competitor benchmarking for Martin Marietta often reveals which operating metrics are genuinely differentiated and which appear similar across the entire peer group. Comparative analysis works best when peers share business drivers, cycle exposure, and capital structure characteristics. For peer comparison, Martin Marietta has a market cap of 35.13 B, P/E of 27.89, profit margin of 18.49%.
Unless otherwise specified, data for Martin Marietta Materials is compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Professional analyst research is incorporated when coverage is available. Updates may occur throughout the day.