Leidos Competitors
| LDOS Stock | USD 172.51 -7.03 -3.92% |
Leidos Holdings and Zoom Video Correlation Snapshot
Average diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between LDOS and ZM stands at 0.17, or Average diversification. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
Moving together with Leidos Stock
| 0.76 | IBM | International Business | PairCorr |
| 0.66 | WIT | Wipro Limited ADR Buyout Trend | PairCorr |
| 0.73 | INFY | Infosys Ltd ADR | PairCorr |
Moving against Leidos Stock
Investors who believe in mean reversion view Leidos Holdings' price extremes not as permanent states but as temporary dislocations that create opportunities for disciplined, contrarian capital allocation.
Leidos Holdings Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Leidos Holdings and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Leidos Stock performing well and Leidos Holdings Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Leidos Holdings' multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WIT | 2.10 | -0.05 | 0.00 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 4.98 | 14.08 | |||
| BR | 1.32 | -0.31 | 0.00 | 3.56 | 0.00 | 2.24 | 8.27 | |||
| CDW | 1.37 | -0.26 | 0.00 | -0.25 | 0.00 | 1.95 | 15.48 | |||
| GIB | 1.26 | -0.27 | 0.00 | -0.50 | 0.00 | 2.64 | 10.69 | |||
| IT | 2.32 | -0.50 | 0.00 | -0.45 | 0.00 | 3.46 | 26.20 | |||
| TDY | 1.23 | 0.42 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 1.01 | 3.04 | 13.90 | |||
| HPQ | 1.58 | -0.40 | 0.00 | -0.45 | 0.00 | 2.61 | 8.82 | |||
| NTAP | 1.57 | -0.21 | 0.00 | -0.15 | 0.00 | 3.17 | 12.53 | |||
| FLEX | 2.38 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 2.99 | 5.23 | 19.07 | |||
| ZM | 1.96 | -0.13 | 0.00 | -0.12 | 0.00 | 3.85 | 22.86 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Leidos Holdings financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Leidos Holdings operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Leidos Holdings and related stocks such as Wipro Limited ADR, Broadridge Financial, and CDW Corp Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WIT | 3.6 B | 59.4 B | 66.3 B | 77.3 B | 88 B | 90.1 B | 82.1 B | 80.8 B | 89.1 B | 104.6 B | 106.6 B | 124.3 B | 116 B | 111.2 B | 132.9 B | 152.8 B | 160.5 B |
| BR | 166.4 M | 123.6 M | 212.1 M | 263 M | 287.1 M | 307.5 M | 326.8 M | 427.9 M | 482.1 M | 462.5 M | 547.5 M | 539.1 M | 630.6 M | 698.1 M | 839.5 M | 965.4 M | 1 B |
| CDW | 12.6 M | 17.1 M | 119 M | 132.8 M | 244.9 M | 403.1 M | 425.1 M | 523.1 M | 643 M | 736.8 M | 788.5 M | 988.6 M | 1.1 B | 1.1 B | 1.1 B | 1.1 B | 1.1 B |
| GIB | 400 K | 131.3 M | 457.1 M | 859.3 M | 965.8 M | 1.1 B | 1 B | 1.1 B | 1.3 B | 1.1 B | 1.4 B | 1.5 B | 1.6 B | 1.7 B | 1.7 B | 1.9 B | 2 B |
| IT | 6 M | 136.9 M | 165.9 M | 182.8 M | 183.8 M | 175.6 M | 193.6 M | 3.3 M | 122.5 M | 233.3 M | 266.7 M | 793.6 M | 807.8 M | 882.5 M | 1.3 B | 729.2 M | 765.6 M |
| TDY | 48.7 M | 255.2 M | 164.1 M | 185 M | 217.7 M | 195.8 M | 190.9 M | 227.2 M | 333.8 M | 402.3 M | 401.9 M | 445.3 M | 788.6 M | 885.7 M | 819.2 M | 894.8 M | 939.5 M |
| HPQ | 489 M | -12.7 B | 5.1 B | 5 B | 4.6 B | 2.5 B | 2.5 B | 5.3 B | 3.2 B | 2.8 B | 6.5 B | 3.1 B | 3.3 B | 2.8 B | 2.5 B | 2.9 B | 3.1 B |
| NTAP | 6.6 M | 605.4 M | 505.3 M | 637.5 M | 559.9 M | 229 M | 509 M | 76 M | 1.2 B | 819 M | 730 M | 937 M | 1.3 B | 986 M | 1.2 B | 1.4 B | 1.4 B |
| FLEX | 1.3 M | 488.8 M | 277.1 M | 365.6 M | 600.8 M | 444.1 M | 319.6 M | 428.5 M | 93 M | 88 M | 613 M | 936 M | 793 M | 1 B | 838 M | 963.7 M | 1 B |
| ZM | -14 K | -14 K | -14 K | -14 K | -14 K | -14 K | -14 K | -3.8 M | 7.6 M | 25.3 M | 672.3 M | 1.4 B | 103.7 M | 637.5 M | 1 B | 1.9 B | 2 B |
Leidos Holdings Competitive Analysis
Investors tracking Leidos Holdings should compare Leidos Holdings' financial results to its peer group to contextualize performance. A company that consistently outperforms Leidos Holdings' competitors on margin and growth metrics is typically a stronger long-term hold.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Leidos Holdings Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Leidos Holdings Against Peers
Leidos Holdings' peer analysis compares Leidos Holdings with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Leidos Holdings trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Leidos Holdings leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.