Kimberly Clark Competitors
| KCDMF Stock | USD 2.25 0.24 11.94% |
Correlation: Kimberly Clark vs Nissin Foods Details
Poor diversification
The correlation between Kimberly Clark and Nissin Foods is 0.61, which Macroaxis classifies as Poor diversification for the selected horizon. This chart helps evaluate whether adding Nissin Foods genuinely reduces risk relative to holding Kimberly Clark alone.
Moving together with Kimberly Pink Sheet
| 0.74 | PG | Procter Gamble | PairCorr |
| 0.62 | UNLYD | Unilever PLC | PairCorr |
| 0.61 | UL | Unilever PLC ADR | PairCorr |
| 0.61 | UNLYF | Unilever PLC | PairCorr |
Moving against Kimberly Pink Sheet
Mean reversion in Kimberly Clark's price occurs when temporary dislocations correct back toward historical fair value. This tendency of Kimberly Clark's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion.
Kimberly Clark Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for Kimberly Clark de Mxico matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Return momentum in Kimberly Pink Sheet is more useful when tested against peer-relative fundamentals and risk. Without risk-adjusted context, investors may overweight short-term returns and underweight the volatility required to achieve them. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KCDMY | 1.44 | 0.20 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 1.77 | 3.37 | 9.16 | |||
| UNLRY | 1.39 | -0.44 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 1.32 | 28.60 | |||
| UNLRF | 1.66 | -0.11 | 0.00 | 18.46 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 41.43 | |||
| BICEY | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.08 | 0.17 | 1.81 | 2.58 | 9.71 | |||
| CFEIY | 0.62 | -0.03 | 0.00 | -0.13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 13.68 | |||
| HEGIY | 0.97 | -0.05 | 0.00 | -0.15 | 0.00 | 2.12 | 7.64 | |||
| GPAGF | 0.28 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 9.12 | |||
| CUYTF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| CHPFF | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 1.32 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.41 | |||
| NFPDF | 0.39 | 0.17 | 0.00 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.99 | 13.86 |
Kimberly Clark Competitive Analysis
Kimberly Clark competes directly with Kimberly Clark, Unilever Indonesia, and PT Unilever, and the financial data points to clear areas of divergence. On scale alone, Kimberly Clark's 3.07 B valuation and 46.89 B revenue define its weight class. The company converts revenue to profit at a 9.67% rate and delivers 104.80% on shareholder equity. On pure scale, Kimberly Clark is the bigger entity with market caps of 6.15 B versus 3.07 B. Top-line revenue favors Unilever Indonesia by a wide margin: 41218.88 B to 46.89 B. Valuation multiples differ: Kimberly Clark at 17.67x P/E versus PT Unilever at 3.51x, suggesting different growth expectations.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Kimberly Clark Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Kimberly Clark Against Peers
Kimberly Clark's peer analysis compares Kimberly Clark with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Kimberly Clark trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Kimberly Clark leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Kimberly Clark's free cash flow conversion rate exceeds the peer group norm, a sign that reported profits are backed by real cash. Relative ranking may help frame which fundamentals deserve deeper follow-up. For peer comparison, Kimberly Clark has a market cap of 3.07 B, P/E of 17.67, profit margin of 9.67%.
Data shown for Kimberly Clark de Mxico is aggregated from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and normalized across reporting formats. Source publication timing can introduce delays.