Kimberly Clark Competitors

KCDMF Stock  USD 2.25  0.24  11.94%   
The company classifies itself in the Household & Personal Products industry (Consumer Defensive sector). Within this framework, Kimberly Clark de Mxico is compared with Kimberly Clark, Unilever Indonesia, PT Unilever, Socit BIC, and China Feihe, along with other selected peers. Interest coverage ratios across Kimberly Clark's peer set reveal which firms carry the most financial risk.

Correlation: Kimberly Clark vs Nissin Foods Details

Poor diversification
The correlation between Kimberly Clark and Nissin Foods is 0.61, which Macroaxis classifies as Poor diversification for the selected horizon. This chart helps evaluate whether adding Nissin Foods genuinely reduces risk relative to holding Kimberly Clark alone.

Moving together with Kimberly Pink Sheet

  0.74PG Procter GamblePairCorr
  0.62UNLYD Unilever PLCPairCorr
  0.61UL Unilever PLC ADRPairCorr
  0.61UNLYF Unilever PLCPairCorr

Moving against Kimberly Pink Sheet

  0.7STI Solidion TechnologyPairCorr
  0.33YHC LQR HousePairCorr
Specify up to 10 symbols:
Mean reversion in Kimberly Clark's price occurs when temporary dislocations correct back toward historical fair value. This tendency of Kimberly Clark's price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion.
Hype
Prediction
LowEstimatedHigh
0.122.355.96
Details
Intrinsic
Valuation
LowRealHigh
0.122.305.91
Details
Naive
Forecast
LowNextHigh
0.042.075.68
Details
Bollinger
Band Projection (param)
LowerMiddle BandUpper
2.092.412.73
Details
Context is everything in equity analysis when evaluating Kimberly Clark's growth rates and margins. Placing Kimberly Clark's results in peer context reveals whether performance is company-specific or industry-wide.

Kimberly Clark Competition Correlation Matrix

Competition correlation for Kimberly Clark de Mxico matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.

High positive correlations

NFPDFKCDMY
BICEYKCDMY
UNLRFUNLRY
GPAGFHEGIY
CFEIYUNLRF
HEGIYKCDMY
  

High negative correlations

NFPDFUNLRY
CFEIYKCDMY
NFPDFUNLRF
UNLRYKCDMY
NFPDFCFEIY
CFEIYBICEY

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

Return momentum in Kimberly Pink Sheet is more useful when tested against peer-relative fundamentals and risk. Without risk-adjusted context, investors may overweight short-term returns and underweight the volatility required to achieve them. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.

Kimberly Clark Competitive Analysis

Kimberly Clark competes directly with Kimberly Clark, Unilever Indonesia, and PT Unilever, and the financial data points to clear areas of divergence. On scale alone, Kimberly Clark's 3.07 B valuation and 46.89 B revenue define its weight class. The company converts revenue to profit at a 9.67% rate and delivers 104.80% on shareholder equity. On pure scale, Kimberly Clark is the bigger entity with market caps of 6.15 B versus 3.07 B. Top-line revenue favors Unilever Indonesia by a wide margin: 41218.88 B to 46.89 B. Valuation multiples differ: Kimberly Clark at 17.67x P/E versus PT Unilever at 3.51x, suggesting different growth expectations.
    
 Better Than Average     
    
 Worse Than Peers    View Performance Chart
KCDMF KCDMY UNLRY UNLRF BICEY CFEIY HEGIY GPAGF CUYTF CHPFF
 11.94 
2.25
Kimberly
 3.37 
11.34
Kimberly
 1.32 
2.30
Unilever
 20.00 
0.12
UNLRF
 1.37 
30.35
Socit
 0.00 
4.99
China
 1.80 
17.53
Hengan
 0.00 
18.55
Gruma
 0.00 
44.10
Etn
 0.00 
0.78
Charoen
Market Volatility
(90 Days Market Risk)
Market Performance
(90 Days Performance)
Odds of Financial Distress
(Probability Of Bankruptcy)
Current Valuation
(Equity Enterprise Value)
Buy or Sell Analysis
(Average Analysts Consensus)
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Not Available
Trade Advice
(90 Days Macroaxis Advice)
Current Ratio
Net Asset
Profit Margin
EBITDA
Operating Margin
Current Valuation
Price To Book
Five Year Return
Retained Earnings
Current Asset
Beta
Number Of Employees
Shares Outstanding
Cash Flow From Operations
Annual Yield
Total Debt
Return On Equity
Z Score
Return On Asset
Book Value Per Share
Current Liabilities
Total Asset
Debt To Equity
Last Dividend Paid
Target Price
Shares Owned By Institutions
Market Capitalization
Price To Earning
Price To Earnings To Growth
Price To Sales
Net Income
Earnings Per Share
Shares Owned By Insiders
Revenue
Working Capital
Cash And Equivalents
Cash Per Share
Gross Profit
Day Typical Price
Accumulation Distribution
Market Facilitation Index
Daily Balance Of Power
Period Momentum Indicator
Rate Of Daily Change
Day Median Price
Price Action Indicator
Relative Strength Index
Coefficient Of Variation
Mean Deviation
Jensen Alpha
Total Risk Alpha
Sortino Ratio
Downside Variance
Standard Deviation
Kurtosis
Potential Upside
Treynor Ratio
Maximum Drawdown
Variance
Market Risk Adjusted Performance
Risk Adjusted Performance
Skewness
Semi Deviation
Information Ratio
Value At Risk
Expected Short fall
Downside Deviation
Semi Variance

Kimberly Clark Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze Kimberly Clark Against Peers

Kimberly Clark's peer analysis compares Kimberly Clark with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:
  • Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
  • Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
  • Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Kimberly Clark trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
  • Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
  • Document the thesis: Record where Kimberly Clark leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

Kimberly Clark's free cash flow conversion rate exceeds the peer group norm, a sign that reported profits are backed by real cash. Relative ranking may help frame which fundamentals deserve deeper follow-up. For peer comparison, Kimberly Clark has a market cap of 3.07 B, P/E of 17.67, profit margin of 9.67%.

Data shown for Kimberly Clark de Mxico is aggregated from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and normalized across reporting formats. Source publication timing can introduce delays.

This content is curated and reviewed by:

Rifka Kats - Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board
Last reviewed on March 14th, 2026