Gambling Competitors
| GAMB Stock | USD 4.14 0.03 0.73% |
Correlation: Gambling vs Strattec Security Details
Pay attention - limited upside
The correlation between GAMB and STRT is -0.75, which Macroaxis classifies as Pay attention - limited upside for the selected horizon. Used correctly, the chart helps investors judge whether adding the second position genuinely diversifies the first.
Moving together with Gambling Stock
Moving against Gambling Stock
While mean reversion in Gambling is a statistically observable tendency, it operates on uncertain timelines. Positions sized too aggressively against the trend can suffer sustained losses before reversion occurs.
Gambling Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Gambling Group and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Gambling Stock performing well and Gambling Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Gambling's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDRO | 1.10 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.28 | 0.98 | 3.52 | 10.35 | |||
| INSE | 1.75 | -0.12 | 0.00 | -0.09 | 0.00 | 2.96 | 7.95 | |||
| ELA | 3.43 | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 4.59 | 8.09 | 25.60 | |||
| LANV | 4.27 | -0.10 | 0.00 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 7.64 | 33.93 | |||
| WEYS | 1.61 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 1.97 | 3.99 | 9.86 | |||
| CHPT | 3.03 | -0.54 | 0.00 | -0.23 | 0.00 | 5.16 | 31.34 | |||
| MSC | 3.16 | -0.11 | 0.00 | 0.44 | 0.00 | 8.22 | 26.13 | |||
| ONEW | 2.75 | -0.13 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 4.74 | 15.63 | |||
| LOVE | 2.47 | -0.30 | 0.00 | -0.20 | 0.00 | 5.88 | 19.72 | |||
| STRT | 1.83 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 1.96 | 4.84 | 10.07 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Gambling Group financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Gambling Group operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Gambling Group and related stocks such as Codere Online Corp, Inspired Entertainment, and Envela Corp Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CDRO | -16.1 M | -16.1 M | -16.1 M | -16.1 M | -16.1 M | -16.1 M | -16.1 M | -16.1 M | -16.1 M | -16.1 M | -16.3 M | -68 M | -46.4 M | -2.4 M | 3.9 M | 4.5 M | 4.7 M |
| INSE | -59.8 M | -59.8 M | -30.3 M | -32.2 M | -141.5 K | -3.5 M | -59.9 M | -49.1 M | -20.6 M | -41.1 M | -56.8 M | -40.6 M | 21.2 M | 6.9 M | 64.8 M | 74.5 M | 78.2 M |
| ELA | -600 K | 1 M | -2.3 M | -2.7 M | -4.5 M | -2.3 M | -4 M | 1.8 M | 657.7 K | 2.8 M | 6.4 M | 10 M | 15.7 M | 7.1 M | 6.8 M | 7.8 M | 8.2 M |
| LANV | -110.8 M | -110.8 M | -110.8 M | -110.8 M | -110.8 M | -110.8 M | -110.8 M | -110.8 M | -110.8 M | -110.8 M | -110.8 M | -65.4 M | -218.3 M | -129.3 M | -165.3 M | -148.7 M | -156.2 M |
| WEYS | 4.8 M | 15.3 M | 19 M | 17.6 M | 19 M | 18.2 M | 16.5 M | 16.5 M | 20.5 M | 20.9 M | -8.5 M | 20.6 M | 29.5 M | 30.2 M | 30.3 M | 23.1 M | 15.2 M |
| CHPT | -75.5 M | -75.5 M | -75.5 M | -75.5 M | -75.5 M | -75.5 M | -75.5 M | -75.5 M | -108.1 M | -134.3 M | -197 M | -132.6 M | -344.5 M | -457.6 M | -277.1 M | -220.2 M | -231.2 M |
| MSC | -66 M | -66 M | -66 M | -66 M | -66 M | -232.6 M | -242.8 M | -76.4 M | -21.6 M | 33.6 M | -321.6 M | -252.6 M | -326.5 M | -133.5 M | -96.7 M | -58.8 M | -61.7 M |
| ONEW | -4.3 M | -4.3 M | -4.3 M | -4.3 M | -4.3 M | -4.3 M | -4.3 M | 1.1 M | 21.1 M | 17.4 M | 79.1 M | 130.9 M | -38.6 M | -5.7 M | -114.6 M | -103.1 M | -98 M |
| LOVE | -9 M | -9 M | -9 M | -9 M | -9 M | -9 M | -6.9 M | -5.5 M | -6.7 M | -15.2 M | 14.7 M | 47.5 M | 26.5 M | 23.9 M | 11.6 M | 13.3 M | 8.9 M |
| STRT | 6.5 M | 8.8 M | 9.4 M | 16.4 M | 20.7 M | 9.1 M | 7.2 M | 12.3 M | -12.7 M | -7.6 M | 7 M | 7 M | -6.7 M | 16.3 M | 18.7 M | 16.8 M | 17.7 M |
Gambling Competitive Analysis
Examining Gambling performance alongside its competitors is a fundamental step in evaluating any equity investment. Competitive benchmarking of Gambling's key financial ratios reveals whether the company is a sector leader or laggard.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Gambling Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Gambling Against Peers
Gambling's peer analysis compares Gambling with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Gambling trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Gambling leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.