COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO Competition

FDCPX Fund

USD 161.08 0.77 0.48%

The fund is listed under the Technology category and is part of the Fidelity Investments family. The peer group for Computers Portfolio Puters includes IT SERVICES, CONSUMER STAPLES, FINANCIAL SERVICES, FIDELITY EMERGING, and Fidelity China among other comparable companies. Gross margin gaps between COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO and its closest rivals often point to structural cost advantages.

Pair Correlation for COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO and Goldman Sachs Overview

Strong inverse diversification

For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO and Goldman Sachs stands at -0.32, or Strong inverse diversification. The overlap area shows the portion of risk that can be diversified away by holding both instruments together.

Moving together with COMPUTERS Mutual Fund

0.69

FPTKX

Fidelity Freedom 2015

Pair Corr

Moving against COMPUTERS Mutual Fund

0.63

FACTX

Fidelity Advisor Health

Pair Corr

Specify up to 10 symbols:

Experienced investors tracking COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO's watch for mean reversion setups where price has deviated from its long-run average. Sentiment extremes, news events, or liquidity shocks are common catalysts for these temporary dislocations in COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO.

Hype

Prediction

Low	Estimated	High
158.63	160.39	162.15

Details

Intrinsic

Valuation

Low	Real	High
144.28	171.32	173.08

Details

Peer comparison enriches COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO analysis by revealing how the company ranks against competitors. COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO's multiples must be compared to direct competitors to determine genuine value.

COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO Competition Correlation Matrix

Competition correlation for Computers Portfolio Puters matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. The business currently sits in the Technology sector and the Large Value industry. In practical terms, lower correlation may offer better diversification while higher correlation may leave the portfolio more exposed to one shared driver.

	FBSOX	FDFAX	FIDSX	FEDDX	FHKCX	DFGX	GPIQ
FBSOX		-0.81	0.78	-0.8	-0.73	-0.41	0.56	FBSOX
FDFAX	-0.81		-0.33	0.93	0.85	0.76	-0.22	FDFAX
FIDSX	0.78	-0.33		-0.35	-0.32	0.05	0.59	FIDSX
FEDDX	-0.8	0.93	-0.35		0.97	0.72	-0.09	FEDDX
FHKCX	-0.73	0.85	-0.32	0.97		0.66	0.05	FHKCX
DFGX	-0.41	0.76	0.05	0.72	0.66		0.14	DFGX
GPIQ	0.56	-0.22	0.59	-0.09	0.05	0.14		GPIQ
	FBSOX	FDFAX	FIDSX	FEDDX	FHKCX	DFGX	GPIQ

High positive correlations

FHKCX	+ 0.97	FEDDX
FEDDX	+ 0.93	FDFAX
FHKCX	+ 0.85	FDFAX
FIDSX	+ 0.78	FBSOX
DFGX	+ 0.76	FDFAX
DFGX	+ 0.72	FEDDX

High negative correlations

FDFAX	- 0.81	FBSOX
FEDDX	- 0.8	FBSOX
FHKCX	- 0.73	FBSOX
DFGX	- 0.41	FBSOX
FEDDX	- 0.35	FIDSX
FIDSX	- 0.33	FDFAX

Risk-Adjusted Indicators

COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO Mutual Fund can look attractive on recent price action while risk efficiency lags the peer group. Risk-adjusted metrics help compare COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO's efficiency and downside exposure against peers on a like-for-like basis. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.

	Mean Deviation	Jensen Alpha	Sortino Ratio	Treynor Ratio	Semi Deviation	Expected Shortfall	Potential Upside	Value @Risk	Maximum Drawdown
FBSOX	1.10	-0.23	0.00	-0.28	0.00	0.00	2.01	-2.77	8.15
FDFAX	0.70	0.05	0.12	0.14	0.81	-0.74	1.30	-1.37	4.69
FIDSX	0.90	-0.06	0.00	-0.11	0.00	0.00	1.45	-1.84	6.16
FEDDX	0.62	0.16	0.15	0.28	0.99	-0.60	1.12	-1.45	5.01
FHKCX	1.10	0.26	0.15	0.16	1.39	-1.11	2.10	-1.88	7.78
DFGX	0.18	-0.02	0.00	0.67	0.00	0.00	0.32	-0.47	1.22
GPIQ	0.71	0.04	0.00	-0.02	0.00	0.00	1.22	-1.54	3.93

COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO Competitive Analysis

Better Than Average

Worse Than Peers

View Performance Chart

	FDCPX	FBSOX	FDFAX	FIDSX	FEDDX	FHKCX	DFGX	GPIQ
	0.48 161.08 COMPUTERS	0.54 39.43 FBSOX	0.38 87.11 CONSUMER	0.27 14.72 FINANCIAL	1.87 20.74 FIDELITY	1.85 59.93 Fidelity	0.50 52.57 Dimensional	0.64 50.33 Goldman
Market Volatility (90 Days Market Risk)	Very Low	Very Low	Very Low	Very Low	Very Low	Very Low	Very Low	Very Low
Market Performance (90 Days Performance)	Balanced	Weak	Contained	Weak	Moderate	Moderate	Weak	Weak
Odds of Financial Distress (Probability Of Bankruptcy)	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low	Low
Current Valuation (Equity Enterprise Value)	Under Valued	Under Valued	Fairly Valued	Fairly Valued	Under Valued	Under Valued	Fairly Valued	Fairly Valued
Buy or Sell Analysis (Average Analysts Consensus)	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available	Not Available
Trade Advice (90 Days Macroaxis Advice)	Strong Buy	Hold	Hold	Strong Hold	Strong Buy	Strong Buy	Sell	Strong Hold
Net Asset	1.88 B	1 B	1.19 B	980.1 M	1.44 B	2.24 B	N/A	N/A
Price To Book	2.49 X	4.69 X	3.99 X	1.38 X	1.53 X	1.47 X	N/A	N/A
Five Year Return	17.19 %	-3.61 %	4.64 %	10.24 %	7.87 %	2.49 %	N/A	N/A
One Year Return	60.93 %	-20.18 %	3.52 %	4.48 %	33.10 %	38.80 %	2.60 %	22.70 %
Last Dividend Paid	0.46	N/A	0.11	0.01	0.1	0.26	N/A	N/A
Price To Earning	17.14 X	25.24 X	20.28 X	15.91 X	13.17 X	13.59 X	N/A	N/A
Price To Sales	0.94 X	2.46 X	1.05 X	2.40 X	0.77 X	1.08 X	N/A	N/A
Cash Position Weight	2.85 %	0.30 %	0.21 %	1.61 %	3.22 %	4.14 %	N/A	N/A
Equity Positions Weight	97.14 %	99.70 %	99.79 %	98.39 %	96.78 %	94.99 %	N/A	N/A
Three Year Return	33.91 %	3.38 %	3.87 %	20.67 %	16.56 %	22.31 %	N/A	N/A
Annual Yield	0.01 %	0.0011 %	0.02 %	0.02 %	0.03 %	0.02 %	N/A	N/A
Year To Date Return	15.49 %	0.83 %	4.73 %	3.07 %	5.78 %	6.50 %	N/A	N/A
Ten Year Return	12.80 %	19.72 %	9.64 %	6.30 %	N/A	9.42 %	N/A	N/A
Day Typical Price	161.08	39.43	87.11	14.72	20.74	59.93	52.57	50.37
Accumulation Distribution	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	64.62	8004.38
Daily Balance Of Power	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	3.714286	0.7111
Period Momentum Indicator	0.77	0.21	-0.33	0.04	0.38	1.09	0.26	0.32
Rate Of Daily Change	1.0	1.01	1.0	1.0	1.02	1.02	1.0	1.01
Day Median Price	161.08	39.43	87.11	14.72	20.74	59.93	52.58	50.39
Price Action Indicator	0.39	0.11	-0.16	0.02	0.19	0.54	0.13	0.11
Coefficient Of Variation	510.92	-523.39	1932.58	-969.61	626.4	744.26	-2,607	-19,557
Mean Deviation	1.34	1.1	0.6978	0.8971	0.6213	1.1	0.1817	0.7061
Jensen Alpha	0.4056	-0.23	0.0518	-0.06	0.1631	0.2576	-0.02	0.0364
Total Risk Alpha	0.4506	-0.18	0.1046	-0.04	0.202	0.2965	-0.0005	0.0545
Sortino Ratio	0.2019	N/A	0.1154	N/A	0.1531	0.1489	N/A	N/A
Downside Variance	3.6	N/A	0.7411	N/A	1.64	2.77	N/A	N/A
Standard Deviation	1.69	1.53	0.886	1.15	0.8937	1.45	0.241	0.8901
Kurtosis	0.3782	3.18	0.1335	0.8018	4.58	1.24	1.42	-0.43
Potential Upside	2.67	2.01	1.3	1.45	1.12	2.1	0.3233	1.22
Treynor Ratio	0.237	-0.28	0.1423	-0.11	0.2766	0.1594	0.6704	-0.02
Maximum Drawdown	8.44	8.15	4.69	6.16	5.01	7.78	1.22	3.93
Variance	2.84	2.34	0.785	1.31	0.7987	2.09	0.0581	0.7923
Market Risk Adjusted Performance	0.247	-0.27	0.1523	-0.10	0.2866	0.1694	0.6804	-0.01
Risk Adjusted Performance	0.1653	-0.15	0.0431	-0.08	0.1315	0.1143	-0.06	-0.0034
Skewness	-0.61	-1.22	0.0546	-0.53	-1.59	-0.72	-1.03	-0.25
Semi Deviation	1.59	N/A	0.8056	N/A	0.995	1.39	N/A	N/A
Information Ratio	0.2275	-0.16	0.1121	-0.06	0.2195	0.1714	0.1836	0.055
Value At Risk	-2.61	-2.77	-1.37	-1.84	-1.45	-1.88	-0.47	-1.54
Expected Short fall	-1.39	N/A	-0.74	N/A	-0.60	-1.11	N/A	N/A
Downside Deviation	1.9	N/A	0.8609	N/A	1.28	1.66	N/A	N/A
Semi Variance	2.52	N/A	0.649	N/A	0.99	1.94	N/A	N/A

COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO Competition Peer Performance Charts

How to Analyze COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO Against Peers

COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO's peer analysis compares COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:

Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
Check valuation dispersion: Review whether COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
Document the thesis: Record where COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.

Use this as an educational baseline, then validate conclusions with current filings, market conditions, and portfolio objectives.

Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology

COMPUTERS PORTFOLIO has a wider economic moat score than the average competitor, based on return spread and reinvestment patterns. The information is presented without directional commentary. Stronger competitive positioning is usually reflected through margins, returns on capital, and balance-sheet resilience.

Inputs for Computers Portfolio Puters come from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and are mapped into a consistent reporting framework. Some fields can appear with publication lag.

This content is curated and reviewed by:

Ellen Johnson - Member of Macroaxis Editorial Board

Last reviewed on March 12th, 2026

Macroaxis provides analytical tools and reference data for investors of all levels to evaluate holdings and assess risk across market volatility, economic shifts, and company-specific events. View terms and conditions

Feedback Blog

Made with optimal in San Francisco

2026 Macroaxis LLC