EA Series Competition
| ECML ETF | 36.01 -0.01 -0.03% |
EA Series and Inspire Global Correlation Snapshot
Minimal diversification benefit
EA Series currently posts a 0.9 correlation with Inspire Global, indicating a Minimal diversification benefit relationship for the active sample. Lower overlap tends to improve diversification, while higher overlap means both positions carry similar risk.
Moving together with ECML ETF
| 0.87 | VBR | Vanguard Small Cap | PairCorr |
| 0.9 | IWN | iShares Russell 2000 | PairCorr |
| 0.9 | DFAT | Dimensional Targeted | PairCorr |
| 0.85 | IJS | iShares SAMPP Small | PairCorr |
| 0.86 | SLYV | SPDR SAMPP 600 | PairCorr |
Moving Against ECML ETF
Mean reversion in EA Series' price occurs when temporary dislocations correct back toward historical fair value. This tendency of EA Series' price to converge to an average value over time is called mean reversion.
EA Series Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for EA Series Trust matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. The useful question is whether competitors are behaving like true alternatives or simply tracking the same sector move with different volatility.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
EA Series Constituents Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Return momentum in ECML ETF is more useful when tested against peer-relative fundamentals and risk. Without risk-adjusted context, investors may overweight short-term returns and underweight the volatility required to achieve them. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EMMF | 0.90 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 1.40 | 1.80 | 6.46 | |||
| FYT | 0.85 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.88 | 2.08 | 5.63 | |||
| RFDI | 0.86 | 0.08 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 1.30 | 1.91 | 5.11 | |||
| FAB | 0.65 | 0.14 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.67 | 1.79 | 3.64 | |||
| GSEE | 1.06 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 1.59 | 2.54 | 6.60 | |||
| DGRE | 1.18 | 0.19 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 1.67 | 2.34 | 7.60 | |||
| BSMC | 0.70 | 0.05 | 0.15 | -0.37 | 0.87 | 1.83 | 4.96 | |||
| KCCA | 0.67 | -0.13 | 0.00 | -1.11 | 0.00 | 1.57 | 6.66 | |||
| IEZ | 1.47 | 0.66 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 1.05 | 3.89 | 9.02 | |||
| BLES | 0.67 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 1.00 | 1.22 | 4.23 |
EA Series Competitive Analysis
| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
EA Series Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze EA Series Against Peers
EA Series' peer analysis compares EA Series with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether EA Series trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where EA Series leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Operating expenses at EA Series as a share of revenue sit below the peer group midpoint, signaling tighter cost control. Relative ranking may help frame which fundamentals deserve deeper follow-up.
Unless otherwise specified, data for EA Series Trust is compiled from fund disclosures and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Updates may occur throughout the day.