Sprinklr Competitors
| CXM Stock | USD 5.88 -0.12 -2.00% |
Correlation: Sprinklr vs Alkami Technology View
Minimal diversification benefit
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between Sprinklr and Alkami Technology stands at 0.95, or Minimal diversification benefit. In portfolio terms, the overlap shows how much shared movement remains after combining both positions.
Moving against Sprinklr Stock
Experienced market participants anticipate that Sprinklr's price will even out over time. Periods when Sprinklr's deviates significantly from its historical mean may warrant further fundamental analysis.
Sprinklr Competition Correlation Matrix
Reviewing how Sprinklr moves relative to competing stocks can show whether peer exposure is reducing portfolio risk or simply repeating the same market bet. The useful question is whether competitors are behaving like true alternatives or simply tracking the same sector move with different volatility.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Sprinklr Stock performing well and Sprinklr Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Sprinklr's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLUS | 1.27 | -0.29 | 0.00 | 1.79 | 0.00 | 2.31 | 7.58 | |||
| DV | 1.88 | -0.16 | 0.00 | -21.66 | 0.00 | 4.15 | 13.65 | |||
| PRGS | 2.40 | -0.46 | 0.00 | 7.94 | 0.00 | 3.47 | 23.54 | |||
| TDC | 2.55 | -0.12 | 0.00 | -0.81 | 0.00 | 3.32 | 41.05 | |||
| NTCT | 1.27 | 0.08 | 0.14 | -0.29 | 1.56 | 2.88 | 9.24 | |||
| ASGN | 2.29 | -0.47 | 0.00 | 2.57 | 0.00 | 4.91 | 18.93 | |||
| ADEA | 2.25 | 0.54 | 0.29 | -1.71 | 1.96 | 4.90 | 14.25 | |||
| PAYO | 2.53 | -0.40 | 0.00 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 5.09 | 27.10 | |||
| IE | 3.49 | -0.38 | 0.00 | -0.48 | 0.00 | 6.46 | 21.73 | |||
| ALKT | 2.57 | -0.53 | 0.00 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 4.94 | 20.26 |
Sprinklr Competitive Analysis
Within its peer group that includes EPlus, DoubleVerify Holdings, and Progress Software, Sprinklr stands out in several ways. The company commands a 1.45 B market valuation built on 857.2 M in annual revenue. Profitability stands at a 2.67% net margin with return on equity reaching 3.80%. EPlus converts shareholder equity more efficiently at 14.62% versus Sprinklr at 3.80%. Net profitability gives DoubleVerify Holdings an edge at 6.77% versus Sprinklr at 2.67%. Progress Software leads on revenue, 977.8 M to 857.2 M.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Sprinklr Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Sprinklr Against Peers
Sprinklr's peer analysis compares Sprinklr with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Sprinklr trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Sprinklr leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Sprinklr's capital allocation track record stands out when measured by cumulative returns on acquisitions versus peers. Price-to-book spreads across Sprinklr's competitors highlight which firms the market values most for their asset base. Relative comparison helps show where Sprinklr is stronger or weaker against peers. For peer comparison, Sprinklr has a market cap of 1.45 B, profit margin of 2.67%.
Unless otherwise specified, data for Sprinklr is compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Updates may occur throughout the day.