Constellium Competitors
| CSTM Stock | USD 23.46 -0.49 -2.05% |
Pair Correlation for Constellium and Fortuna Silver Summary
Weak diversification
Constellium currently posts a 0.49 correlation with Fortuna Silver, indicating a Weak diversification relationship for the active sample. This chart helps evaluate whether adding Fortuna Silver genuinely reduces risk relative to holding Constellium alone.
Moving together with Constellium Stock
Moving Against Constellium Stock
The concept of mean reversion suggests that Constellium's price will eventually return toward its long-run average. Positions sized too aggressively against the trend can suffer sustained losses before reversion occurs in Constellium. The mean reversion framework for Constellium is built on the premise that markets are not perfectly efficient.
Constellium Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for Constellium Nv matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. A reading near +1 usually means prices have moved in tandem, a reading near -1 suggests opposite movement, and a reading near zero points to weaker historical dependence.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Evaluating Constellium Stock requires separating price momentum from underlying operating strength versus competitors. Risk-adjusted metrics help compare Constellium's efficiency and downside exposure against peers on a like-for-like basis. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KALU | 2.23 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 3.07 | 4.73 | 16.39 | |||
| CENX | 3.16 | 0.61 | 0.14 | 0.43 | 3.95 | 7.06 | 22.08 | |||
| DRD | 3.16 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.08 | 0.00 | 6.04 | 18.99 | |||
| SID | 3.23 | -0.18 | 0.00 | -0.16 | 0.00 | 7.14 | 21.46 | |||
| OLN | 3.15 | 0.74 | 0.19 | 0.32 | 3.21 | 6.54 | 18.91 | |||
| ERO | 3.18 | 0.12 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 6.01 | 18.34 | |||
| ASH | 1.64 | 0.00 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 4.05 | 10.15 | |||
| BCC | 1.86 | 0.14 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 1.82 | 6.21 | 11.11 | |||
| MTRN | 2.34 | 0.37 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 2.95 | 4.95 | 14.50 | |||
| FSM | 3.40 | 0.16 | 0.00 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 6.35 | 22.16 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Constellium Nv financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Constellium Nv operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Constellium Nv and related stocks such as Kaiser Aluminum, Century Aluminum, and DRDGOLD Limited ADR Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KALU | 202.1 M | 26.6 M | 85.8 M | 104.8 M | 71.8 M | -236.6 M | 91.7 M | 45.4 M | 91.7 M | 62 M | 28.8 M | -18.5 M | -29.6 M | 47.2 M | 46.8 M | 112.5 M | 118.1 M |
| CENX | 16.5 M | 11.3 M | -35.6 M | -40.3 M | 112.5 M | -47.7 M | -252.4 M | 48.6 M | -66.2 M | -80.8 M | -123.3 M | -167.1 M | -14.1 M | -43.1 M | 336.8 M | 41.8 M | 43.9 M |
| DRD | -9.1 M | 308.7 M | 49.4 M | -45.8 M | 67.8 M | 61.9 M | 13.7 M | 6.5 M | 78.5 M | 635 M | 1.4 B | 1.1 B | 1.3 B | 1.3 B | 2.2 B | 2.6 B | 2.7 B |
| SID | 457 M | 3.7 B | -420.1 M | 509 M | -112.3 M | 1.3 B | -934.7 M | 10.3 M | 5.2 B | 1.8 B | 3.8 B | 12.3 B | 1.6 B | -318.2 M | -2.6 B | -2 B | -1.9 B |
| OLN | -165.3 M | 241.7 M | 149.6 M | 178.6 M | 105.7 M | -1.4 M | -3.9 M | 549.5 M | 327.9 M | -11.3 M | -969.9 M | 1.3 B | 1.3 B | 460.2 M | 108.6 M | -42.8 M | -40.7 M |
| ASH | 146.7 M | 26 M | 683 M | 233 M | 309 M | -29 M | 1000 K | 114 M | 505 M | -508 M | 220 M | 927 M | 178 M | 169 M | -845 M | -760.5 M | -722.5 M |
| BCC | -98.5 M | -46.4 M | 41.5 M | 116.9 M | 80 M | 52.2 M | 38.3 M | 83 M | 20.5 M | 80.9 M | 175 M | 712.5 M | 857.7 M | 483.7 M | 376.4 M | 132.8 M | 198.8 M |
| MTRN | 26.1 M | 40 M | 24.7 M | 19.7 M | 41.7 M | 32.2 M | 25.7 M | 11.5 M | 20.8 M | 53.4 M | 15.5 M | 72.5 M | 86 M | 95.7 M | 5.9 M | 74.8 M | 78.6 M |
| FSM | -46.5 K | 19.5 M | 31.5 M | -19.1 M | 15.6 M | -10.6 M | 17.9 M | 66.3 M | 34 M | 23.8 M | 21.6 M | 57.9 M | -128.1 M | -50.8 M | 128.7 M | 302.1 M | 317.2 M |
Constellium Competitive Analysis
Placing Constellium next to Kaiser Aluminum, Century Aluminum, and DRDGOLD Limited puts raw numbers into competitive context. A 3.30 B valuation paired with 7.19 B in revenue sets the baseline. Profitability stands at a 3.23% net margin with return on equity reaching 32.39%. Return on equity favors Constellium at 32.39%, well ahead of Kaiser Aluminum at 14.34%. Valuation multiples differ: Constellium at 25.18x P/E versus Century Aluminum at 5.08x, suggesting different growth expectations. On the bottom line, DRDGOLD Limited retains 35.06% while Constellium manages 3.23%.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Constellium Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Constellium Against Peers
Constellium's peer analysis compares Constellium with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Constellium trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Constellium leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Analyst consensus for Constellium shows a wider price target range than peers, reflecting higher uncertainty about fair value. Geographic revenue mix for Constellium versus peers affects currency exposure and growth opportunity differently. Competition analysis adds context to price action by grounding it in relative fundamentals. For peer comparison, Constellium has a market cap of 3.3 B, P/E of 25.18, profit margin of 3.23%.
Data shown for Constellium Nv is aggregated from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and normalized across reporting formats. Analyst projections are included when active coverage applies. Source publication timing can introduce delays.