CompoSecure, Competitors
| CMPODelisted Stock | USD 16.51 -0.86 -4.95% |
Correlation: CompoSecure, vs Power Solutions Overview
Weak diversification
The correlation between CompoSecure, and Power Solutions is 0.54, which Macroaxis classifies as Weak diversification for the selected horizon. Lower overlap tends to improve diversification, while higher overlap means both positions carry similar risk.
Moving against CompoSecure, Stock
Experienced investors tracking CompoSecure,'s watch for mean reversion setups where price has deviated from its long-run average. Sentiment extremes, news events, or liquidity shocks are common catalysts for these temporary dislocations in CompoSecure,.
CompoSecure, Competition Correlation Matrix
Competition correlation for CompoSecure matters because related securities often respond to the same industry, factor, or macro drivers even when their business stories differ. The useful question is whether competitors are behaving like true alternatives or simply tracking the same sector move with different volatility.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
CompoSecure, Company can look attractive on recent price action while risk efficiency lags the peer group. Risk-adjusted metrics help compare CompoSecure,'s efficiency and downside exposure against peers on a like-for-like basis. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FA | 2.92 | -0.19 | 0.00 | -0.17 | 0.00 | 4.70 | 27.95 | |||
| PCT | 3.94 | -0.13 | 0.00 | -0.13 | 0.00 | 10.30 | 41.75 | |||
| UPWK | 3.00 | -0.76 | 0.00 | -0.56 | 0.00 | 6.23 | 26.37 | |||
| SBLK | 1.61 | 0.43 | 0.18 | 0.59 | 2.11 | 3.64 | 10.05 | |||
| AMRC | 2.72 | 0.13 | 0.00 | -0.02 | 0.00 | 4.66 | 25.96 | |||
| BWLP | 2.06 | 0.57 | 0.19 | 0.62 | 2.66 | 4.60 | 15.51 | |||
| LUNR | 6.38 | 1.49 | 0.19 | 0.46 | 6.64 | 12.46 | 53.62 | |||
| HUBG | 1.92 | -0.22 | 0.00 | -0.44 | 0.00 | 3.91 | 22.67 | |||
| ALG | 1.66 | 0.03 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 3.58 | 22.29 | |||
| PSIX | 4.69 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 6.88 | 9.14 | 48.13 |
CompoSecure, Competitive Analysis
CompoSecure,'s competitive standing becomes clearer when measured alongside First Advantage, Purecycle Technologies, and Upwork. With 420.6 M in revenue and a 7.28 B market value, CompoSecure, anchors one end of the peer spectrum. CompoSecure, reports a -134.84% net margin, indicating profitability pressure. Net profitability gives First Advantage an edge at -2.21% versus CompoSecure, at -134.84%. Revenue tilts toward CompoSecure, at 420.6 M compared with 8.4 M. Market capitalization diverges sharply here: 7.28 B versus 1.47 B, giving CompoSecure, a clear size advantage.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
CompoSecure, Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze CompoSecure, Against Peers
CompoSecure,'s peer analysis compares CompoSecure, with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether CompoSecure, trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where CompoSecure, leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Market share trends show CompoSecure, gaining ground while several peers have seen flat or declining positions. The information is presented without directional commentary. Stronger competitive positioning is usually reflected through margins, returns on capital, and balance-sheet resilience. For peer comparison, CompoSecure, has a market cap of 7.28 B, profit margin of -134.84%.
Reported values for CompoSecure are derived from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and then standardized for analysis. Refresh timing depends on source availability.