Alibaba Group Competitors
| BABA Stock | USD 125.41 -4.46 -3.43% |
Alibaba Group vs Williams Sonoma Correlation Summary
Poor diversification
The correlation between Alibaba Group and Williams Sonoma is 0.75, which Macroaxis classifies as Poor diversification for the selected horizon. This chart helps evaluate whether adding Williams Sonoma genuinely reduces risk relative to holding Alibaba Group alone.
Moving Against Alibaba Stock
Mean reversion analysis in Alibaba Group's involves identifying price extremes that diverge materially from the historical norm. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers anticipating a recovery. Mean reversion in Alibaba Group is distinct from trend following, which rides momentum rather than betting on reversals.
Alibaba Group Competition Correlation Matrix
Studying peer correlation around Alibaba Group Holding gives investors a cleaner read on how much independent price behavior still exists across the competitive set. Used correctly, correlation analysis helps separate broad industry exposure from company-specific behavior before additional capital is allocated across the peer group.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Evaluating Alibaba Stock requires separating price momentum from underlying operating strength versus competitors. Without risk-adjusted context, investors may overweight short-term returns and underweight the volatility required to achieve them. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HD | 1.14 | 0.01 | 0.00 | -0.07 | 0.00 | 2.54 | 7.27 | |||
| PDD | 1.43 | -0.02 | 0.00 | -0.09 | 0.00 | 2.93 | 8.37 | |||
| EBAY | 1.64 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 2.34 | 3.37 | 11.00 | |||
| TM | 1.27 | 0.04 | 0.00 | -0.05 | 0.00 | 3.16 | 9.17 | |||
| MELI | 1.77 | -0.20 | 0.00 | -0.27 | 0.00 | 3.72 | 16.92 | |||
| JD | 1.37 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 1.40 | 3.20 | 8.80 | |||
| ULTA | 1.58 | -0.14 | 0.00 | -0.30 | 0.00 | 2.58 | 17.67 | |||
| MNSO | 1.50 | -0.23 | 0.00 | -0.32 | 0.00 | 3.18 | 10.71 | |||
| CART | 1.95 | -0.29 | 0.00 | -0.61 | 0.00 | 3.56 | 13.98 | |||
| WSM | 1.75 | 0.08 | 0.00 | -0.03 | 0.00 | 3.85 | 11.23 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Alibaba Group Holding financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Alibaba Group Holding operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Alibaba Group Holding and related stocks such as Home Depot, PDD Holdings, and eBay Inc Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HD | 8.2 M | 3.9 B | 4.5 B | 5.4 B | 6.3 B | 7 B | 8 B | 8.6 B | 11.1 B | 11.2 B | 12.9 B | 16.4 B | 17.1 B | 15.1 B | 14.8 B | 14.2 B | 14.9 B |
| PDD | -292 M | -292 M | -292 M | -292 M | -292 M | -292 M | -292 M | -525.1 M | -10.2 B | -7 B | -7.2 B | 7.8 B | 31.5 B | 60 B | 112.4 B | 129.3 B | 135.8 B |
| EBAY | 900 K | 3.2 B | 2.6 B | 2.9 B | 46 M | 1.7 B | 7.3 B | -1 B | 2.5 B | 1.8 B | 5.7 B | 13.6 B | -1.3 B | 2.8 B | 2 B | 2 B | 2.1 B |
| TM | 347 B | 283.6 B | 962.2 B | 1.8 T | 2.2 T | 2.3 T | 1.8 T | 2.5 T | 1.9 T | 2 T | 2.2 T | 2.9 T | 2.5 T | 4.9 T | 4.8 T | 5.5 T | 5.8 T |
| MELI | -2.5 M | 76.8 M | 101.2 M | 117.5 M | 72.6 M | 105.8 M | 136.4 M | 13.8 M | -36.6 M | -172 M | -1000 K | 83 M | 482 M | 987 M | 1.9 B | 2 B | 2.1 B |
| JD | -1.3 B | -1.3 B | -3.3 B | -2.5 B | -13 B | -7.7 B | -2 B | 128.8 M | -2.5 B | 12.2 B | 49.4 B | -3.6 B | 10.4 B | 24.2 B | 41.4 B | 19.6 B | 20.6 B |
| ULTA | 9.7 M | 120.3 M | 172.5 M | 202.8 M | 257.1 M | 320 M | 409.8 M | 555.2 M | 658.6 M | 705.9 M | 175.8 M | 985.8 M | 1.2 B | 1.3 B | 1.2 B | 1.2 B | 1.2 B |
| MNSO | -290.6 M | -290.6 M | -290.6 M | -290.6 M | -290.6 M | -290.6 M | -290.6 M | -290.6 M | -290.6 M | -262.3 M | -1.4 B | -1.4 B | 638.2 M | 2.3 B | 2.6 B | 3 B | 3.2 B |
| CART | 3 M | 3 M | 3 M | 3 M | 3 M | 3 M | 3 M | 3 M | 3 M | -531 M | -70 M | -73 M | 428 M | -1.6 B | 457 M | 447 M | 469.4 M |
| WSM | 2.4 M | 236.9 M | 256.7 M | 278.9 M | 308.9 M | 310.1 M | 305.4 M | 259.5 M | 333.7 M | 356.1 M | 680.7 M | 1.1 B | 1.1 B | 949.8 M | 1.1 B | 1.1 B | 1.1 B |
Alibaba Group Competitive Analysis
Sizing up Alibaba Group against Home Depot, PDD Holdings, and EBay reveals meaningful differences in scale and efficiency. At a 310.05 B valuation, Alibaba Group brings in 996.35 B on the top line. The company converts revenue to profit at a 8.91% rate and delivers 8.23% on shareholder equity. Home Depot leads with 145.54% return on equity versus 8.23% for Alibaba Group. PDD Holdings keeps more of each revenue dollar with a 23.01% margin versus 8.91% at Alibaba Group. Alibaba Group leads on revenue, 996.35 B to 11.10 B, a substantial gap.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Alibaba Group Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Alibaba Group Against Peers
Alibaba Group's peer analysis compares Alibaba Group with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Alibaba Group trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Alibaba Group leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Earnings revisions for Alibaba Group have trended more positive than for its closest peers over the last 90 days. SG&A trends for Alibaba Group compared to rivals reveal whether overhead is scaling efficiently with revenue. Competition analysis is most useful when price, margins, leverage, and growth are read together. For peer comparison, Alibaba Group has a market cap of 310.05 B, P/E of 112.48, profit margin of 8.91%.
Unless otherwise specified, data for Alibaba Group Holding is compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Updates may occur throughout the day.