Ambarella Competitors
| AMBA Stock | USD 54.53 -0.05 -0.09% |
Correlation: Ambarella vs Verra Mobility Details
Very poor diversification
For the present investment horizon, the measured correlation between Ambarella and Verra Mobility stands at 0.83, or Very poor diversification. In portfolio terms, the overlap shows how much shared movement remains after combining both positions.
Moving against Ambarella Stock
Mean reversion analysis in Ambarella's involves identifying price extremes that diverge materially from the historical norm. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers anticipating a recovery. Mean reversion in Ambarella is distinct from trend following, which rides momentum rather than betting on reversals.
Ambarella Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Ambarella and its competitors provides context for understanding whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. A reading near +1 usually means prices have moved in tandem, a reading near -1 suggests opposite movement, and a reading near zero points to weaker historical dependence.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
Evaluating Ambarella Stock requires separating price momentum from underlying operating strength versus competitors. Without risk-adjusted context, investors may overweight short-term returns and underweight the volatility required to achieve them. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors evaluate volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across different positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPGP | 3.08 | 0.99 | 0.22 | 0.83 | 3.54 | 5.50 | 47.86 | |||
| SLAB | 2.09 | 0.92 | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.91 | 4.49 | 49.65 | |||
| SIMO | 2.50 | 0.63 | 0.19 | 0.72 | 3.00 | 6.97 | 23.47 | |||
| SYNA | 2.16 | 0.20 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 2.46 | 5.55 | 15.72 | |||
| GBTG | 2.27 | -0.48 | 0.00 | -0.40 | 0.00 | 3.42 | 17.40 | |||
| NIQ | 2.75 | -0.50 | 0.00 | -1.05 | 0.00 | 4.93 | 25.33 | |||
| COMM | 1.99 | 0.41 | 0.17 | 1.02 | 2.44 | 4.14 | 15.17 | |||
| NVTS | 5.38 | 0.87 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 5.38 | 17.37 | 32.82 | |||
| FORM | 3.12 | 1.22 | 0.31 | 0.61 | 3.01 | 6.53 | 24.82 | |||
| VRRM | 1.40 | -0.61 | 0.00 | -1.59 | 0.00 | 2.09 | 17.39 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Ambarella financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Ambarella operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Ambarella and related stocks such as IPG Photonics, Silicon Laboratories, and Silicon Motion Technology Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IPGP | -49.6 M | 117.8 M | 145 M | 155.8 M | 200.4 M | 242.2 M | 260.8 M | 347.6 M | 404 M | 180.2 M | 159.6 M | 278.4 M | 109.9 M | 218.9 M | -181.5 M | 31.1 M | 29.5 M |
| SLAB | 11 M | 35.5 M | 63.5 M | 49.8 M | 38 M | 29.6 M | 61.5 M | 47.1 M | 83.6 M | 19.3 M | 12.5 M | 2.1 B | 91.4 M | -34.5 M | -191 M | -64.9 M | -61.7 M |
| SIMO | -12.5 M | 41.5 M | 47.2 M | 27.4 M | 44.3 M | 60.3 M | 110.9 M | 75 M | 100.3 M | 64.4 M | 79.7 M | 200 M | 172.5 M | 52.9 M | 89.2 M | 122.7 M | 61.9 M |
| SYNA | 1.9 M | 54.1 M | 98.9 M | 46.7 M | 110.4 M | 72.2 M | 48.8 M | -124.1 M | -22.9 M | 118.8 M | 79.6 M | 257.5 M | 73.6 M | 125.6 M | -47.8 M | -55 M | -52.2 M |
| GBTG | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 19 M | 134 M | -614 M | -467 M | -25 M | -63 M | -138 M | 109 M | 114.5 M |
| NVTS | -17.3 M | -17.3 M | -17.3 M | -17.3 M | -17.3 M | -17.3 M | -17.3 M | -17.3 M | -17.3 M | -17.3 M | -19 M | -152.7 M | 73.9 M | -145.4 M | -84.6 M | -117 M | -111.1 M |
| FORM | 2.1 M | -66 M | -35.5 M | -57.7 M | -19.2 M | -1.5 M | -6.6 M | 40.9 M | 104 M | 39.3 M | 78.5 M | 83.9 M | 50.7 M | 82.4 M | 69.6 M | 54.4 M | 57.1 M |
| VRRM | 11.4 M | 11.4 M | 11.4 M | 11.4 M | 11.4 M | 11.4 M | 29 M | 1.4 M | -58.4 M | 17.1 M | -4.6 M | 41.4 M | 92.5 M | 57 M | 31.4 M | 136.6 M | 143.5 M |
Ambarella Competitive Analysis
Sizing up Ambarella against IPG Photonics, Silicon Laboratories, and Silicon Motion reveals meaningful differences in scale and efficiency. At a 2.35 B valuation, Ambarella brings in 390.7 M on the top line. Ambarella currently operates at a -19.42% net margin with return on equity at -13.12%, reflecting headwinds in the current cycle. On equity returns, IPG Photonics earns 1.50% compared to -13.12% at Ambarella. Market capitalization diverges sharply here: 6.83 B versus 2.35 B, giving Silicon Laboratories a clear size advantage. Top-line revenue favors Silicon Motion by a wide margin: 885.6 M to 390.7 M.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Ambarella Competition Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Ambarella Against Peers
Ambarella's peer analysis compares Ambarella with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Ambarella trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Ambarella leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.
Peer Comparison Metrics & Methodology
Insider ownership at Ambarella is higher than at most peers, which can align management incentives with shareholder interests. Momentum scores across the peer set show which names are gaining relative strength and which are fading. Competition analysis is most useful when price, margins, leverage, and growth are read together. For peer comparison, Ambarella has a market cap of 2.35 B, P/E of 202.7, profit margin of -19.42%.
Unless otherwise specified, data for Ambarella is compiled from periodic company reporting and market reference feeds and standardized for comparability. Analyst projections are included when active coverage applies. Updates may occur throughout the day.