Alexander Competitors
| ALEX Stock | USD 20.84 0.01 0.05% |
Alexander Baldwin vs CTO Realty Correlation View
Modest diversification
Across the chosen horizon, ALEX and CTO show a correlation of 0.29 and fall into the Modest diversification bucket. The overlap area represents the portion of risk that may be diversified away when both instruments are held together and nothing else in the portfolio changes.
Moving against Alexander Stock
Mean reversion in Alexander Baldwin's price occurs when temporary dislocations - caused by sentiment extremes, news events, or liquidity shocks - correct back toward the stock's historical fair value.
Alexander Baldwin Competition Correlation Matrix
Correlation analysis between Alexander Baldwin Holdings and its competitors helps investors understand whether diversification is real or only superficial inside the same peer group. This matrix is most informative when investors want to know whether adding another peer would improve diversification, increase crowding, or leave total risk largely unchanged.
High positive correlations
| High negative correlations
|
Risk-Adjusted Indicators
There is a big difference between Alexander Stock performing well and Alexander Baldwin Company doing well as a business compared to the competition. There are so many exceptions to the norm that investors cannot definitively determine what's good or bad unless they analyze Alexander Baldwin's multiple risk-adjusted performance indicators across the competitive landscape. These indicators are quantitative in nature and help investors forecast volatility and risk-adjusted expected returns across various positions.| Mean Deviation | Jensen Alpha | Sortino Ratio | Treynor Ratio | Semi Deviation | Expected Shortfall | Potential Upside | Value @Risk | Maximum Drawdown | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAT | 1.09 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 1.36 | 2.22 | 6.72 | |||
| TKURF | 0.01 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 3.61 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.26 | |||
| SAFE | 1.36 | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.20 | 1.68 | 2.87 | 8.85 | |||
| RETDF | 0.53 | 0.29 | 0.00 | 0.47 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 17.80 | |||
| ESRT | 1.54 | -0.33 | 0.00 | -0.54 | 0.00 | 2.81 | 10.07 | |||
| OLP | 0.87 | 0.21 | 0.22 | -6.16 | 0.94 | 1.84 | 5.20 | |||
| ATVXF | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| XIORF | 0.67 | -0.06 | 0.00 | -1.49 | 0.00 | 2.05 | 9.20 | |||
| KWIPF | 0.59 | -0.25 | 0.00 | -1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 17.07 | |||
| CTO | 0.94 | 0.13 | 0.15 | -2.01 | 0.98 | 2.37 | 5.75 |
Peer Comparison: Net Income
Net income is one of the most important fundamental items in finance. It plays a large role in Alexander Baldwin financial statement analysis. It represents the amount of money remaining after all of Alexander Baldwin Holdings operating expenses, interest, taxes and preferred stock dividends have been deducted from a company total revenue.Compare Alexander Baldwin and related stocks such as American Assets Trust, Tokyu REIT, and Safehold Net Income Over Time
Select Fundamental| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 | 2026 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAT | -2.5 M | 2.9 M | 51.6 M | 22.6 M | 31.1 M | 53.9 M | 45.6 M | 40.1 M | 27.2 M | 60.2 M | 35.6 M | 36.6 M | 55.9 M | 64.7 M | 72.8 M | 71.4 M | 39 M |
| SAFE | 3.4 M | -22.1 M | -239.9 M | -112 M | 873 K | 5.3 M | 6.6 M | 175.7 M | 11.7 M | 27.7 M | 59.3 M | 73.1 M | 135.4 M | -55 M | 105.8 M | 114.5 M | 120.2 M |
| ESRT | 52.7 M | 57.4 M | 48.6 M | 38 M | 27.1 M | 34.7 M | 52.4 M | 63.6 M | 66.5 M | 51.2 M | -12.5 M | -6.5 M | 40.6 M | 53.2 M | 51.6 M | 47.6 M | 33.5 M |
| OLP | 2.1 M | 13.7 M | 32.3 M | 32.3 M | 22.1 M | 20.5 M | 24.4 M | 24.1 M | 20.7 M | 18 M | 27.4 M | 38.9 M | 42.2 M | 29.6 M | 30.4 M | 25.5 M | 16.6 M |
| CTO | 3.6 M | -4.7 M | 599.2 K | 3.7 M | 6.4 M | 8.3 M | 16.3 M | 41.7 M | 37.2 M | 115 M | 78.5 M | 29.9 M | 3.2 M | 5.5 M | -2 M | 10.1 M | 13.1 M |
Alexander Baldwin Competitive Analysis
To gauge Alexander Baldwin's financial strength, comparing it with American Assets, Tokyu REIT, and Safehold offers useful context. Alexander Baldwin is valued at 1.52 B and generates 206.7 M in revenue. A 6.49% return on equity and 30.09% net margin underscore Alexander Baldwin's earnings capacity. On the bottom line, Alexander Baldwin retains 30.09% while American Assets manages 12.89%. Tokyu REIT leads on revenue, 20.31 B to 206.7 M, a substantial gap. On pure scale, Alexander Baldwin is the larger business with market caps of 1.52 B versus 1.06 B.| Better Than Average | Worse Than Peers | View Performance Chart |
Peer Performance Charts
How to Analyze Alexander Baldwin Against Peers
Alexander Baldwin's peer analysis compares Alexander Baldwin with related companies to put valuation, quality, and risk metrics in context. This helps determine whether recent performance is company-specific or broadly sector-driven. A practical workflow includes:- Set a relevant peer group: Include direct competitors and close alternatives with comparable business exposure.
- Benchmark core financials: Compare profitability, growth, capital structure, and cash flow quality.
- Check valuation dispersion: Review whether Alexander Baldwin trades at a premium or discount versus peers and why.
- Evaluate risk profile: Compare volatility, drawdowns, and correlation to avoid false diversification assumptions.
- Document the thesis: Record where Alexander Baldwin leads or lags and what catalysts could close or widen the gap.