Take Two Profitability Analysis
| TTWO Stock | USD 200.84 0.21 0.10% |
Net Loss | First Reported 1997-03-31 | Previous Quarter -133.9 M | Current Value -92.9 M | Quarterly Volatility 453.4 M |
Macro event markers
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.3 | 0.2588 |
|
|
Return on equity and margin analysis for Take Two Interactive Software provide context on earnings efficiency. This view reflects reported profitability without advisory interpretation.
Revenue Mix By Segments
Revenue for Take Two breaks down into 3 product-level segments. The largest contributor is Mobile at 865.8 Million (51.0% of revenue), with Console accounting for 652.1 Million (38.4%). While one segment leads, Take Two's remaining product lines provide a degree of revenue balance.
World Market Map.
Macro event markers
Take Two Revenue by Earnings Segment View
Take Two's product-level revenue split is shown below, highlighting each segment's share of total revenue. On the smaller end, P C And Other Products contributes 10.7% to Take Two's revenue.
The estimates provide a structured view of expected earnings for Take Two. This view summarizes available data without implying outcomes.
Quarterly Earnings Growth -0.50 | Earnings Share -22.57 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.249 | Return On Assets |
Take Two's market capitalization and book value each provide useful but distinct information about the business. Valuation methods compare these perspectives to frame context.
For Take Two, intrinsic value is a model-driven estimate while price is a market-driven observation. For Take Two, key inputs include a P/E ratio of 24.04, a P/B ratio of 10.63, a profit margin of -60.45%, and ROE of -86.22%.
Take Two Interactive Return On Asset vs. Return On Equity Fundamental Analysis
Comparative market metrics assess Take Two's pricing relative to peers. Take Two Interactive Software takes the leading position in return on equity compared to key competitors. It also takes the leading position in return on asset compared to key competitors . Take Two shows Return On Equity developing negatively by approximately 7.01% year over year. The most recent reading for Return On Equity was -0.2568. Earnings-driven valuation ratios benchmark Take Two.Take Return On Asset vs. Return On Equity
Return on Equity (ROE) measures how effectively a company converts shareholders' equity into net income. It is calculated by dividing net income by average shareholders' equity, and it reflects management's ability to generate profit from the capital investors have committed. ROE is one of the most widely used profitability ratios because it ties directly to shareholder value creation.
Take Two |
| = | -0.86 |
An ROE between 10% and 30% is generally considered healthy for most industries, supporting both dividend payments and reinvestment in future growth. However, ROE should not be evaluated in isolation. A high ROE driven by excessive financial leverage can signal risk rather than efficiency, so investors typically cross-reference ROE with debt-to-equity ratios and return on assets to distinguish genuine operational strength from balance-sheet amplification.
Return on Assets (ROA) measures how efficiently a company generates profit relative to its total asset base. It is calculated by dividing net income by total assets and reflects management's effectiveness at deploying capital across the business. ROA is particularly useful for comparing companies within the same industry, since asset intensity varies widely across sectors.
Take Two |
| = | -0.0027 |
A higher ROA indicates that each dollar of assets produces more income, which generally signals operational efficiency. Asset-heavy industries such as banking, utilities, and manufacturing tend to have lower ROAs than asset-light businesses like software or professional services. When ROA is low, it may indicate either underperforming operations or a capital-intensive business model that requires ongoing investment to sustain revenue.
Take Return On Asset Comparison
Take Two is currently under evaluation in return on asset compared to key competitors.
Take Two Profitability Projections
A key trait of a strong company is its ability to earn a profit, and for Take Two investors this matters a lot. The rate of change in Take Two's profit metrics often matters more than the level itself. Take Two currently maintains a profit margin of -60.5%. The gap between gross and net margins shows how much of Take Two's revenue goes to overhead and debt costs. The operating margin stands at -2.1% while return on equity is -86.2%. Investors who watch Take Two's profit trends are better placed to spot changes in returns. Recent net income of -4.48 B reflects the bottom-line result of these profitability dynamics.
| Last Reported | End Of Year Estimate | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -87.2 M | -82.8 M | |
| Operating Income | -4 B | -3.8 B | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -90.2 M | -85.7 M | |
| Net Loss | -4 B | -3.8 B | |
| Income Tax Expense | -11.2 M | -10.6 M | |
| Income Before Tax | -4 B | -3.8 B | |
| Net Loss | -1 B | -961.6 M | |
| Net Loss | -4 B | -3.8 B | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | -155.6 M | -147.8 M | |
| Interest Income | 113.4 M | 119.1 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -63.6 M | -60.4 M | |
| Change To Netincome | -12.7 M | -12 M | |
| Net Loss | -1.80 | -1.89 | |
| Income Quality | 1.52 | 1.60 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 1.03 | 0.70 |
Take Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers for Take Two are the financial and operational factors that most influence its earnings. Investors recognize that unforeseen events and market disruptions can significantly alter Take Two's earnings trajectory. Profitability drivers for Take Two provide the analytical framework for evaluating its earnings resilience.
Take Two Profitability Trends
The profitability trend for Take Two is a clear indicator of business model health. An upward trend indicates improving operational efficiency, while a downward trend signals declining margins. Changes in Take Two's operating margin frequently anticipate broader shifts in earnings trajectory.
Take Two Profitability Drivers Correlations
Quickly synthesizing Take Two financial data from reports and external analyses requires a structured approach. Understanding the correlations between Take Two's revenue and profit indicators focuses attention on the most important drivers. Understanding these correlations supports building more precise financial models for Take Two over time.
Click cells to compare fundamentals
Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The consensus EPS estimate for Take Two stands at -0.4067 for the upcoming period, with projections ranging from -0.67 to -0.21 across analysts tracking Take Two Interactive Software. This figure is derived from trailing twelve-month data and excludes non-recurring items to reflect the underlying earnings run rate. The spread between low and high captures the analytical uncertainty inherent in any forward EPS projection.Last Reported EPS
-0.67 Lowest | Expected EPS | -0.21 Highest |
Earnings Projection Consensus
Comparing Take Two's estimated fair value to its current price provides a quick relative-value signal. An estimate above market price is traditionally associated with potential undervaluation; below market price may suggest the opposite. These signals require context - factor in earnings quality, sector conditions, and interest rate environment before drawing investment conclusions.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 30th of June 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 28 | 65.19% | 0.0 | -0.4067 | -22.57 |
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Reported EPS for Take Two is the most direct expression of quarterly profit quality available to investors. Expected EPS compiled by analysts covering Take Two Interactive Software serves as the performance standard against which actual results are measured. Weighted share count methodology ensures that changes in equity outstanding are fairly reflected in the calculation.Estimated Months Earnings per Share
For investors in Take Two seeking steady income, EPS is a primary indicator of dividend security. When EPS rises, the company has more per-share earnings available for distribution; when it falls, dividend coverage may tighten. Supplement EPS analysis with free cash flow conversion and peer comparison to build a complete income investment thesis.Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
When Take Two reports EPS above consensus, both retail and institutional investors typically reassess their forward assumptions. Sustained beats over multiple quarters often lead to multiple expansion, while persistent misses can compress valuation. Analysts derive these consensus targets from guidance, industry data, and comparable company analysis.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
null | null | null | null | null | 0 | ||
2026-02-03 | 2025-12-31 | 0.83 | 1.23 | 0.4 | 48 | ||
2025-11-05 | 2025-09-30 | -0.66 | -0.73 | -0.07 | 10 | ||
2025-08-07 | 2025-06-30 | -0.72 | -0.07 | 0.65 | 90 | ||
2025-05-15 | 2025-03-31 | -0.05 | -21.08 | -21.03 | 42060 | ||
2025-02-06 | 2024-12-31 | -0.9 | -0.71 | 0.19 | 21 | ||
2024-11-06 | 2024-09-30 | -2.11 | -2.08 | 0.03 | 1 | ||
2024-08-08 | 2024-06-30 | -0.02 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 350 | ||
2024-05-16 | 2024-03-31 | 0.09 | 0.28 | 0.19 | 211 | ||
2024-02-08 | 2023-12-31 | 0.72 | 0.71 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2023-11-08 | 2023-09-30 | 1.03 | 1.22 | 0.19 | 18 | ||
2023-08-08 | 2023-06-30 | 0.42 | 0.27 | -0.15 | 35 | ||
2023-05-17 | 2023-03-31 | 0.68 | 0.59 | -0.09 | 13 | ||
2023-02-06 | 2022-12-31 | 0.87 | 0.86 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2022-11-07 | 2022-09-30 | 1.37 | 1.3 | -0.07 | 5 | ||
2022-08-08 | 2022-06-30 | 0.85 | 0.74 | -0.11 | 12 | ||
2022-05-16 | 2022-03-31 | 1.04 | 1.09 | 0.05 | 4 | ||
2022-02-07 | 2021-12-31 | 1.22 | 1.32 | 0.1 | 8 | ||
2021-11-03 | 2021-09-30 | 1.34 | 1.63 | 0.29 | 21 | ||
2021-08-02 | 2021-06-30 | 0.89 | 1.01 | 0.12 | 13 | ||
2021-05-18 | 2021-03-31 | 0.67 | 0.94 | 0.27 | 40 | ||
2021-02-08 | 2020-12-31 | 0.96 | 1.25 | 0.29 | 30 | ||
2020-11-05 | 2020-09-30 | 1.48 | 2.0 | 0.52 | 35 | ||
2020-08-03 | 2020-06-30 | 1.6 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 43 | ||
2020-05-20 | 2020-03-31 | 0.89 | 1.5 | 0.61 | 68 | ||
2020-02-06 | 2019-12-31 | 1.75 | 1.63 | -0.12 | 6 | ||
2019-11-07 | 2019-09-30 | 1.69 | 1.93 | 0.24 | 14 | ||
2019-08-05 | 2019-06-30 | 0.03 | 0.27 | 0.24 | 800 | ||
2019-05-13 | 2019-03-31 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
2019-02-06 | 2018-12-31 | 2.8 | 2.9 | 0.1 | 3 | ||
2018-11-07 | 2018-09-30 | 0.92 | 1.05 | 0.13 | 14 | ||
2018-08-02 | 2018-06-30 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.06 | 100 | ||
2018-05-16 | 2018-03-31 | 0.63 | 0.87 | 0.24 | 38 | ||
2018-02-07 | 2017-12-31 | 0.98 | 1.12 | 0.14 | 14 | ||
2017-11-07 | 2017-09-30 | 0.74 | 1.16 | 0.42 | 56 | ||
2017-08-02 | 2017-06-30 | 0.19 | 0.41 | 0.22 | 115 | ||
2017-05-23 | 2017-03-31 | 0.57 | 0.68 | 0.11 | 19 | ||
2017-02-07 | 2016-12-31 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2016-11-02 | 2016-09-30 | 0.29 | 0.66 | 0.37 | 127 | ||
2016-08-04 | 2016-06-30 | -0.29 | -0.34 | -0.05 | 17 | ||
2016-05-18 | 2016-03-31 | 0.26 | 0.46 | 0.2 | 76 | ||
2016-02-03 | 2015-12-31 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.1 | 20 | ||
2015-11-05 | 2015-09-30 | 0.15 | 0.3 | 0.15 | 100 | ||
2015-08-10 | 2015-06-30 | 0.36 | 0.31 | -0.05 | 13 | ||
2015-05-18 | 2015-03-31 | 0.27 | 0.49 | 0.22 | 81 | ||
2015-02-03 | 2014-12-31 | 1.52 | 1.87 | 0.35 | 23 | ||
2014-10-29 | 2014-09-30 | -0.59 | -0.44 | 0.15 | 25 | ||
2014-08-05 | 2014-06-30 | -0.26 | -0.14 | 0.12 | 46 | ||
2014-05-13 | 2014-03-31 | 0.1 | 0.21 | 0.11 | 110 | ||
2014-02-03 | 2013-12-31 | 1.37 | 1.7 | 0.33 | 24 | ||
2013-10-29 | 2013-09-30 | 1.71 | 2.49 | 0.78 | 45 | ||
2013-07-30 | 2013-06-30 | -0.57 | -0.54 | 0.03 | 5 | ||
2013-05-13 | 2013-03-31 | 0.23 | 0.38 | 0.15 | 65 | ||
2013-02-05 | 2012-12-31 | 0.54 | 0.67 | 0.13 | 24 | ||
2012-10-31 | 2012-09-30 | -0.18 | 0.11 | 0.29 | 161 | ||
2012-07-31 | 2012-06-30 | -0.65 | -1.16 | -0.51 | 78 | ||
2012-05-22 | 2012-03-31 | -0.55 | -0.6 | -0.05 | 9 | ||
2012-02-02 | 2011-12-31 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.04 | 17 | ||
2011-11-08 | 2011-09-30 | -0.57 | -0.47 | 0.1 | 17 | ||
2011-08-08 | 2011-06-30 | 0.09 | 0.02 | -0.07 | 77 | ||
2011-05-24 | 2011-03-31 | -0.39 | -0.18 | 0.21 | 53 | ||
2011-02-08 | 2010-12-31 | 0.34 | 0.52 | 0.18 | 52 | ||
2010-12-16 | 2010-09-30 | 0.31 | 0.67 | 0.36 | 116 | ||
2010-09-02 | 2010-06-30 | -0.06 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 566 | ||
2010-06-08 | 2010-03-31 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 0.08 | 30 | ||
2010-03-03 | 2009-12-31 | -0.51 | -0.31 | 0.2 | 39 | ||
2009-12-17 | 2009-09-30 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 12 | ||
2009-09-01 | 2009-06-30 | -0.68 | -0.66 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2009-05-26 | 2009-03-31 | -0.13 | -0.04 | 0.09 | 69 | ||
2009-03-10 | 2008-12-31 | -0.72 | -0.52 | 0.2 | 27 | ||
2008-12-17 | 2008-09-30 | 0.06 | 0.02 | -0.04 | 66 | ||
2008-09-04 | 2008-06-30 | 0.54 | 0.93 | 0.39 | 72 | ||
2008-06-05 | 2008-03-31 | 1.13 | 1.52 | 0.39 | 34 | ||
2008-03-11 | 2007-12-31 | -0.51 | -0.41 | 0.1 | 19 | ||
2007-12-18 | 2007-09-30 | -0.24 | 0.05 | 0.29 | 120 | ||
2007-09-10 | 2007-06-30 | -0.8 | -0.64 | 0.16 | 20 | ||
2007-06-11 | 2007-03-31 | -0.58 | -0.41 | 0.17 | 29 | ||
2007-03-12 | 2006-12-31 | -0.33 | -0.13 | 0.2 | 60 | ||
2006-06-08 | 2006-03-31 | -0.11 | -0.71 | -0.6 | 545 | ||
2006-03-07 | 2005-12-31 | -0.11 | -0.41 | -0.3 | 272 | ||
2005-09-07 | 2005-06-30 | -0.38 | -0.41 | -0.03 | 7 | ||
2005-06-02 | 2005-03-31 | -0.13 | -0.12 | 0.01 | 7 | ||
2005-03-03 | 2004-12-31 | 0.72 | 0.79 | 0.07 | 9 | ||
2004-12-16 | 2004-09-30 | 1.03 | 0.91 | -0.12 | 11 | ||
2004-09-09 | 2004-06-30 | -0.2 | -0.21 | -0.01 | 5 | ||
2004-06-08 | 2004-03-31 | -0.1 | -0.22 | -0.12 | 120 | ||
2004-03-04 | 2003-12-31 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2003-12-18 | 2003-09-30 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2003-09-03 | 2003-06-30 | 0.11 | 0.12 | 0.01 | 9 | ||
2003-05-29 | 2003-03-31 | 0.23 | 0.24 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2003-02-27 | 2002-12-31 | 0.77 | 0.8 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2002-12-17 | 2002-09-30 | 0.32 | 0.36 | 0.04 | 12 | ||
2002-09-05 | 2002-06-30 | 0.05 | 0.08 | 0.03 | 60 | ||
2002-06-06 | 2002-03-31 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2002-03-14 | 2001-12-31 | 0.6 | 0.61 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2001-08-29 | 2001-06-30 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2001-05-24 | 2001-03-31 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2001-02-26 | 2000-12-31 | 0.19 | 0.16 | -0.03 | 15 | ||
2000-12-14 | 2000-09-30 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2000-08-24 | 2000-06-30 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 28 | ||
2000-06-01 | 2000-03-31 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.01 | 12 | ||
2000-02-24 | 1999-12-31 | 0.12 | 0.13 | 0.01 | 8 | ||
1999-12-16 | 1999-09-30 | 0.23 | 0.26 | 0.03 | 13 | ||
1999-08-25 | 1999-06-30 | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 16 | ||
1999-05-26 | 1999-03-31 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.02 | 66 |
Use Take Two in pair-trading
Pair analysis around Take Two Interactive Software matters because it can turn one security idea into a more market-neutral structure. Used properly, pair trading is less about prediction in isolation and more about identifying relative mispricing between related positions.
Take Two Pair Trading
Take Two Interactive Software Pair Trading Analysis
Using correlated positions as Take Two substitutes during tax-loss harvesting captures tax benefits. By replacing Take Two with a sufficiently similar instrument, investors realize a tax loss while maintaining exposure. Understanding the correlation structure around Take Two Interactive Software supports better tax-loss harvesting decisions.
The correlation of Take Two with other assets is a key diversification metric for portfolio construction. This coefficient ranges between -1 and +1, expressing the direction and strength of co-movement. Lower correlation of Take Two Interactive with other holdings allows for a more efficient portfolio frontier.
Using Correlation analysis with pair analysis helps develop hedging context around Take Two.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Take Two position
At 37.15 Billion in the Electronic Gaming & Multimedia space, Take Two Interactive Software mid-cap profile gives investors a structured starting point for building sector-aligned themes. Anchoring a Electronic Gaming & Multimedia theme around Take Two Interactive Software at 37.15 Billion can be tuned for upside participation or tighter downside control depending on Communication Services outlook.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Long/short ETFs Thematic Idea Now
Long/short ETFs
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Long/short ETFs theme has 34 constituents at this time.
The Long/short ETFs Theme can be deployed as a buy-and-hold allocation or traded actively around individual position volatility.
| View All Next | Launch |