Radcom Net Income vs. Current Valuation
| RDCM Stock | USD 11.12 -0.15 -1.33% |
Net Income | First Reported 1997-03-31 | Previous Quarter 3.5 M | Current Value 3.6 M | Quarterly Volatility 1.4 M |
Macro event markers
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.55 | 0.7595 |
|
|
This profitability view for Radcom summarizes relationships between earnings and core financial drivers. The dataset is based on disclosed financial information. Metrics reflect relationships across revenue, asset base, and capital structure.
Your Equity Center. Macro event markers
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.513 | Earnings Share 0.7 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.159 | Return On Assets |
Investors evaluate Radcom using market value and book value, each describing different facets of the business. Radcom's market capitalization is 182.43 M. A P/B ratio of 1.62 indicates the market values Radcom above its accounting book value. Enterprise value stands at 78.2 M. The intrinsic value concept focuses on underlying worth, which can diverge from market price and book value. Analytical frameworks help reconcile those views into a coherent picture. All figures are based on reported data and are informational in nature.
The concept of value for Radcom differs from its quoted price, since each reflects a different lens. For Radcom, key inputs include a P/E ratio of 28.2, a P/B ratio of 1.62, a profit margin of 16.77%, and ROE of 11.43%. By contrast, Radcom market price reflects the level where buyers and sellers transact.
Radcom Current Valuation vs. Net Income Fundamental Analysis
Peer multiple analysis evaluates Radcom's pricing efficiency within its industry. Radcom takes the leading position in net income compared to key competitors. It also takes the leading position in current valuation compared to key competitors producing 6.52 in Current Valuation for each unit of Net Income. Net Income is evolving in line with broader financial reporting trends. Year-ago financials show Radcom with Net Income of 11.99 Million. Earnings-based multiples benchmark Radcom's market valuation.Radcom Current Valuation vs. Net Income
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Radcom |
| = | 11.99 M |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Enterprise Value is a firm valuation proxy that approximates the current market value of a company. It is typically used to determine the takeover or merger price of a firm. Unlike Market Cap, this measure takes into account all liquid assets, outstanding debt, and exotic equity instruments that the company has on its balance sheet. When a takeover occurs, the parent company will have to assume the target company's liabilities but will take possession of all cash and cash equivalents.
Radcom |
| = | 78.2 M |
Enterprise Value can be a useful tool to compare companies with different capital structures. Long term liability and current cash or cash equivalents can have a huge impact on market valuation of a given company.
Radcom Current Valuation vs Competition
Radcom takes the leading position in current valuation compared to key competitors. After adjusting for long-term liabilities, total market size of Information Technology industry is at this time estimated at about 6.21 Billion. Radcom claims roughly 78.2 Million in current valuation contributing just under 2% to equities under Information Technology sector.
Radcom Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Radcom, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Radcom will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Radcom's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Radcom, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | End Of Year Estimate | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -2.9 M | -3.1 M | |
| Operating Income | 8.3 M | 8.7 M | |
| Net Income | 12 M | 12.6 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 595 K | 615.3 K | |
| Income Before Tax | 12.6 M | 13.2 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | 4.3 M | 4.5 M | |
| Net Loss | -2 M | -2.1 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 8 M | 8.4 M | |
| Interest Income | 5.4 M | 5.7 M | |
| Net Interest Income | 5.2 M | 5.4 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 3.9 M | 2.1 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 0.71 | 0.75 | |
| Income Quality | 1.88 | 2.01 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.95 | 1.00 |
Radcom Profitability Driver Comparison
Understanding Radcom's profitability drivers is essential for assessing the sustainability of its earnings. Unexpected events such as tax policy changes, commodity price shocks, or economic downturns can materially alter the profit outlook and affect long-term investment returns.
Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The forward EPS consensus for Radcom stands at 0.27, compiled from analyst models tracking Radcom's revenue, margin, and guidance trends. The estimate range spans from 0.27 to 0.27, capturing uncertainty around the projection. This figure is derived from a 12-month earnings base and strips out one-time items for comparability.Last Reported EPS
0.27 Lowest | Expected EPS | 0.27 Highest |
Earnings Projection Consensus
The spread between Radcom's estimated fair value and its market price encodes a directional signal: narrow spreads suggest efficient pricing; wide spreads suggest a potential catalyst or mispricing. Analysts use this gap to identify entry and exit points, though the estimate itself carries model risk. Factor in liquidity, sector context, and macro environment before acting on this comparison.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 2 | 65.84% | 0.31 | 0.27 | 0.7 |
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
The actual EPS reported by Radcom reflects real earnings performance verified through its financial statements. The expected EPS consensus for Radcom is the result of analyst modeling and represents the market's pre-event benchmark. Weighted share count is used to normalize EPS across periods where the number of outstanding shares changes.Estimated Months Earnings per Share
Income investors tracking Radcom rely on EPS as a measure of earnings coverage for the dividend. A consistent EPS growth trajectory suggests management has both the intent and capacity to increase shareholder distributions over time. For a rounded view, compare EPS against free cash flow yield and the dividend payout ratios of sector peers.Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
For investors monitoring Radcom, earnings surprise data provides a historical record of how the market has repriced the stock after each quarterly report. Surprise direction and magnitude together determine whether a post-earnings move is likely to be sustained. Analyst EPS estimates evolve through the quarter based on guidance revisions and new sector information.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-02-18 | 2025-12-31 | 0.23 | 0.31 | 0.08 | 34 | ||
2025-11-12 | 2025-09-30 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.05 | 20 | ||
2025-08-13 | 2025-06-30 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 8 | ||
2025-05-14 | 2025-03-31 | 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.05 | 25 | ||
2025-02-12 | 2024-12-31 | 0.2 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 15 | ||
2024-11-13 | 2024-09-30 | 0.2 | 0.23 | 0.03 | 15 | ||
2024-08-07 | 2024-06-30 | 0.15 | 0.2 | 0.05 | 33 | ||
2024-05-15 | 2024-03-31 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2024-01-31 | 2023-12-31 | 0.16 | 0.25 | 0.09 | 56 | ||
2023-11-08 | 2023-09-30 | 0.09 | 0.15 | 0.06 | 66 | ||
2023-08-02 | 2023-06-30 | 0.05 | 0.13 | 0.08 | 160 | ||
2023-05-10 | 2023-03-31 | 0.03 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 300 | ||
2023-02-08 | 2022-12-31 | 0.05 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 80 | ||
2022-11-10 | 2022-09-30 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 200 | ||
2022-08-11 | 2022-06-30 | -0.01 | -0.0864 | -0.0764 | 764 | ||
2022-05-12 | 2022-03-31 | -0.04 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 200 | ||
2022-02-24 | 2021-12-31 | -0.05 | -0.02 | 0.03 | 60 | ||
2021-11-11 | 2021-09-30 | -0.07 | -0.02 | 0.05 | 71 | ||
2021-08-12 | 2021-06-30 | -0.04 | -0.02 | 0.02 | 50 | ||
2021-05-11 | 2021-03-31 | -0.08 | -0.07 | 0.01 | 12 | ||
2021-02-17 | 2020-12-31 | -0.04 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 125 | ||
2020-11-10 | 2020-09-30 | -0.04 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 150 | ||
2020-08-11 | 2020-06-30 | -0.08 | 0.02 | 0.1 | 125 | ||
2020-05-12 | 2020-03-31 | -0.1 | -0.17 | -0.07 | 70 | ||
2020-02-13 | 2019-12-31 | -0.14 | -0.04 | 0.1 | 71 | ||
2019-11-07 | 2019-09-30 | -0.06 | -0.07 | -0.01 | 16 | ||
2019-08-12 | 2019-06-30 | -0.26 | -0.03 | 0.23 | 88 | ||
2019-05-07 | 2019-03-31 | -0.29 | -0.2 | 0.09 | 31 | ||
2019-02-12 | 2018-12-31 | -0.26 | -0.27 | -0.01 | 3 | ||
2018-11-07 | 2018-09-30 | -0.06 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 216 | ||
2018-08-07 | 2018-06-30 | 0.05 | 0.1 | 0.05 | 100 | ||
2018-05-22 | 2018-03-31 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 250 | ||
2018-02-13 | 2017-12-31 | 0.09 | 0.21 | 0.12 | 133 | ||
2017-11-06 | 2017-09-30 | 0.01 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 1300 | ||
2017-08-07 | 2017-06-30 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 50 | ||
2017-05-04 | 2017-03-31 | -0.02 | 0.02 | 0.04 | 200 | ||
2017-02-14 | 2016-12-31 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2016-11-01 | 2016-09-30 | 0.03 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 200 | ||
2016-08-03 | 2016-06-30 | 0.07 | 0.17 | 0.1 | 142 | ||
2016-05-10 | 2016-03-31 | 0.05 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 180 | ||
2016-02-17 | 2015-12-31 | 0.06 | -0.19 | -0.25 | 416 | ||
2015-10-27 | 2015-09-30 | 0.1 | 0.09 | -0.01 | 10 | ||
2015-07-21 | 2015-06-30 | 0.1 | 0.09 | -0.01 | 10 | ||
2015-04-28 | 2015-03-31 | 0.14 | 0.09 | -0.05 | 35 | ||
2015-02-03 | 2014-12-31 | 0.06 | 0.2 | 0.14 | 233 | ||
2014-10-29 | 2014-09-30 | 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.07 | 233 | ||
2014-07-23 | 2014-06-30 | 0.05 | 0.04 | -0.01 | 20 | ||
2002-07-22 | 2002-06-30 | -0.52 | -0.56 | -0.04 | 7 | ||
2002-04-22 | 2002-03-31 | -0.62 | -0.48 | 0.14 | 22 | ||
2002-02-11 | 2001-12-31 | -0.6 | -0.48 | 0.12 | 20 | ||
2001-10-23 | 2001-09-30 | -0.84 | -0.64 | 0.2 | 23 | ||
2001-07-18 | 2001-06-30 | -0.92 | -0.96 | -0.04 | 4 | ||
2001-04-23 | 2001-03-31 | -1 | -0.96 | 0.04 | 4 | ||
2001-01-30 | 2000-12-31 | -0.44 | -0.24 | 0.2 | 45 | ||
2000-10-23 | 2000-09-30 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 100 | ||
2000-07-17 | 2000-06-30 | -0.02 | -0.36 | -0.34 | 1700 | ||
2000-04-17 | 2000-03-31 | 0.04 | -0.2 | -0.24 | 600 | ||
2000-01-24 | 1999-12-31 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 16 | ||
1999-11-17 | 1999-09-30 | -0.04 | -0.08 | -0.04 | 100 | ||
1999-01-20 | 1998-12-31 | 0.2 | 0.12 | -0.08 | 40 | ||
1998-10-28 | 1998-09-30 | 0.24 | -0.24 | -0.48 | 200 | ||
1998-07-29 | 1998-06-30 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.05 | 26 | ||
1998-04-27 | 1998-03-31 | 0.08 | 0.16 | 0.08 | 100 | ||
1998-02-09 | 1997-12-31 | 0.32 | 0.4 | 0.08 | 25 |
Use Radcom in pair-trading
Pair analysis around Radcom matters because it can turn one security idea into a more market-neutral structure. This framework is most useful when investors want to hedge directional moves caused by sector headlines or broad market pressure.
Radcom Pair Trading
Radcom Pair Trading Analysis
Correlation analysis provides context to find suitable substitutes for Radcom during tax-loss harvesting periods. Selling Radcom at a loss and immediately repurchasing it would violate IRS wash-sale rules, so a correlated replacement asset is required to maintain portfolio.
Measuring the statistical correlation of Radcom against other instruments provides context for understanding portfolio diversification. A correlation near zero implies that Radcom provides genuine diversification benefits, while high positive correlations suggest redundant exposures.
Pair trading evaluation alongside Correlation analysis adds hedging context for Radcom. The analysis can be scoped to sector peers or extended to a wider stock universe.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Radcom position
At 182.43 Million in the Telecom Services space, Radcom smaller-cap profile gives investors a structured starting point for building sector-aligned themes. For Radcom in Telecom Services, the theme workflow defines the investment thesis first, then optimizes which Communication Services assets best express that view at the smaller-cap level.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Latest Gainers Thematic Idea Now
Latest Gainers
Dynamically computed list of top equities currently sorted across major exchanges. The Latest Gainers theme has 138 constituents at this time.
Whether used as a passive allocation or an active trading idea, the Latest Gainers Theme provides a structured starting point for portfolio construction.
| View All Next | Launch |