Ryder System Net Income vs. Return On Asset
| R Stock | USD 201.31 9.53 4.97% |
Net Income | First Reported 1985-09-30 | Previous Quarter 138 M | Current Value 133 M | Quarterly Volatility 74.5 M |
Macro event markers
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.22 | 0.1977 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.09 | 0.0857 |
|
|
The profitability profile for Ryder System reflects how income compares to revenue, assets, and capital. All values are derived from reported financial statements.
Revenue Breakdown by Operating Segment
Ryder System's top line is composed of 3 product-level revenue streams. At 1.47 Billion, Fleet Management Solutions is Ryder System's largest segment (43.0%), with Supply Chain Solutions as the second-largest at 1.38 Billion. Ryder System's revenue leans toward the top segment but maintains meaningful contributions from other product lines.
Your Equity Center.
Macro event markers
Earnings Segment Revenue Breakdown for Ryder System Snapshot
The breakdown below shows how Ryder System's revenue is split across product segments for the most recent reporting period. On the smaller end, Dedicated Transportation Solutions contributes 16.6% to Ryder System's revenue.
The estimates help frame performance context across reporting periods. Values are based on disclosed financial data across reporting cycles.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 0.045 | Dividend Share 3.44 | Earnings Share 11.99 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth -0.004 |
The gap between Ryder System's market value and book value reflects how the market perceives future potential versus historical cost.
Understanding Ryder System involves recognizing that value and price can reflect different time horizons. For Ryder System, key inputs include a P/E ratio of 5.75, a P/B ratio of 2.46, a profit margin of 3.94%, and ROE of 16.24%.
Ryder System Return On Asset vs. Net Income Fundamental Analysis
Cross-company financial ratios help determine Ryder System's valuation standing. Ryder System outranks all peers for net income against industry peers. It is ranked fifth for return on asset against industry peers . Net Income runs about 12,619,647,355 times Return On Asset for Ryder System. Forward estimates place Net Income near 523.95 Million, implying a recovering bias. A year ago, Ryder System reported Net Income at 499 Million. Relative ratio analysis evaluates Ryder System's earnings valuation.Ryder Return On Asset vs. Net Income
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Ryder System |
| = | 501 M |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Return on Assets (ROA) measures how efficiently a company generates profit relative to its total asset base. It is calculated by dividing net income by total assets and reflects management's effectiveness at deploying capital across the business. ROA is particularly useful for comparing companies within the same industry, since asset intensity varies widely across sectors.
Ryder System |
| = | 0.0397 |
A higher ROA indicates that each dollar of assets produces more income, which generally signals operational efficiency. Asset-heavy industries such as banking, utilities, and manufacturing tend to have lower ROAs than asset-light businesses like software or professional services. When ROA is low, it may indicate either underperforming operations or a capital-intensive business model that requires ongoing investment to sustain revenue.
Ryder Return On Asset Comparison
Ryder System is currently under evaluation for return on asset against industry peers.
Ryder System Profitability Projections
Profit growth is the base of long-term returns, making Ryder System's profit trends vital for any review. Margin trends for Ryder System show whether the company is gaining or losing pricing and cost edges. Ryder System currently maintains a profit margin of 3.9%. Shrinking margins during revenue growth may mean that scale is not turning into savings. The operating margin stands at 6.9% while return on equity is 16.2%. These profit trends should be viewed alongside revenue and cash flow data for a full picture. Recent net income of 501.0 M reflects the bottom-line result of these profitability dynamics.
| Last Reported | End Of Year Estimate | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -620 M | -651 M | |
| Operating Income | 1.1 B | 1.1 B | |
| Income Before Tax | 685 M | 719.2 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -401 M | -380.9 M | |
| Net Income | 501 M | 526 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 184 M | 97.7 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 496 M | 287.8 M | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 501 M | 360.5 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | 36.8 M | 24 M | |
| Interest Income | 404 M | 283.5 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -404 M | -383.8 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 239.4 M | 251.4 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 11.94 | 12.53 | |
| Income Quality | 5.18 | 2.81 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.73 | 0.60 |
Ryder Profitability Driver Comparison
Investors in Ryder System should monitor its profitability drivers closely for changes in financial trajectory. Unexpected events, including regulatory changes and macroeconomic disruptions, can materially affect Ryder System's profits. Profitability drivers for Ryder System are interconnected, so a change in one factor often affects others. Use profitability driver analysis as a foundation for building a structured investment thesis around Ryder System.
Earnings Estimation Breakdown
Based on trailing twelve-month earnings reporting, analysts project Ryder System's next EPS at 3.6138. The range of analyst estimates extends from 3.45 on the low end to 3.81 on the high end for Ryder System. Non-recurring items are excluded from this projection to ensure that the estimate reflects sustainable earnings capacity.Last Reported EPS
3.45 Lowest | Expected EPS | 3.81 Highest |
Earnings Projection Consensus
A consensus EPS-based fair value estimate above Ryder System's current market price may suggest the stock is trading below intrinsic value by some metrics. An estimate below market price raises questions about whether the current valuation is sustainable without stronger earnings growth. Both interpretations are scenario-based and should be paired with fundamental due diligence and risk assessment before allocation.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 30th of June 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 10 | 89.58% | 0.0 | 3.6138 | 11.99 |
Earnings History
Professional analysts covering Ryder System revise EPS estimates throughout the quarter based on new data, guidance updates, and sector shifts. The final consensus ahead of the earnings date becomes the reference point against which reported results are judged. Comparing consensus trends to actual outcomes over multiple quarters reveals analytical reliability over time.Ryder System Quarterly Gross Profit | 612 Million |
The mean reversion effect in Ryder System is stronger when the initial deviation was driven by sentiment rather than fundamentals. Such deviations have sometimes corrected when the initial catalyst fades, though timing remains uncertain. The degree to which Ryder System's exhibits mean reversion depends on how efficiently the market prices new information. Short-term deviations can persist and even widen before correcting, making position sizing critical.
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
The distinction between actual and expected EPS for Ryder System is foundational to earnings analysis. Actual EPS is confirmed at the close of each reporting cycle; expected EPS is the analyst consensus formed before reporting. Higher EPS is generally associated with stronger profitability, and the weighted average methodology ensures fairness when share counts fluctuate.Estimated Months Earnings per Share
Income-focused investors in Ryder System use EPS trends as a proxy for dividend sustainability and future payout growth. Rising EPS supports the ability to maintain or increase distributions; declining EPS may signal payout risk. For best results, EPS should be evaluated alongside payout ratio, free cash flow, and peer comparisons.Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Earnings surprises represent the gap between what Ryder System reports and what the analyst community projected - a gap that markets price rapidly and often decisively. Both the direction and magnitude of the surprise influence the near-term trend after results are published. Analyst EPS estimates are built from guidance, sector trends, and detailed financial models updated throughout the quarter.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
null | null | null | null | null | 0 | ||
2026-02-11 | 2025-12-31 | 3.57 | 3.59 | 0.02 | 0 | ||
2025-10-23 | 2025-09-30 | 3.61 | 3.57 | -0.04 | 1 | ||
2025-07-24 | 2025-06-30 | 3.14 | 3.32 | 0.18 | 5 | ||
2025-04-23 | 2025-03-31 | 2.3928 | 2.46 | 0.0672 | 2 | ||
2025-02-12 | 2024-12-31 | 3.3735 | 3.45 | 0.0765 | 2 | ||
2024-10-24 | 2024-09-30 | 3.42 | 3.44 | 0.02 | 0 | ||
2024-07-25 | 2024-06-30 | 2.87 | 3.0 | 0.13 | 4 | ||
2024-04-23 | 2024-03-31 | 1.71 | 2.14 | 0.43 | 25 | ||
2024-02-14 | 2023-12-31 | 2.73 | 2.95 | 0.22 | 8 | ||
2023-10-25 | 2023-09-30 | 3.22 | 3.58 | 0.36 | 11 | ||
2023-07-26 | 2023-06-30 | 2.91 | 3.61 | 0.7 | 24 | ||
2023-04-26 | 2023-03-31 | 2.96 | 2.81 | -0.15 | 5 | ||
2023-02-15 | 2022-12-31 | 3.5 | 3.89 | 0.39 | 11 | ||
2022-10-26 | 2022-09-30 | 3.65 | 4.45 | 0.8 | 21 | ||
2022-07-27 | 2022-06-30 | 4.01 | 4.43 | 0.42 | 10 | ||
2022-04-27 | 2022-03-31 | 2.36 | 3.59 | 1.23 | 52 | ||
2022-02-16 | 2021-12-31 | 2.47 | 3.52 | 1.05 | 42 | ||
2021-10-27 | 2021-09-30 | 2.09 | 2.55 | 0.46 | 22 | ||
2021-07-28 | 2021-06-30 | 1.38 | 2.4 | 1.02 | 73 | ||
2021-04-28 | 2021-03-31 | 0.57 | 1.09 | 0.52 | 91 | ||
2021-02-11 | 2020-12-31 | 0.95 | 0.83 | -0.12 | 12 | ||
2020-10-28 | 2020-09-30 | -0.32 | 1.21 | 1.53 | 478 | ||
2020-07-29 | 2020-06-30 | -1.29 | -0.95 | 0.34 | 26 | ||
2020-04-29 | 2020-03-31 | -0.78 | -1.38 | -0.6 | 76 | ||
2020-02-13 | 2019-12-31 | 0.03 | -0.01 | -0.04 | 133 | ||
2019-10-29 | 2019-09-30 | 1.48 | -1.49 | -2.97 | 200 | ||
2019-07-30 | 2019-06-30 | 1.38 | 1.4 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2019-04-30 | 2019-03-31 | 0.97 | 1.11 | 0.14 | 14 | ||
2019-02-14 | 2018-12-31 | 1.83 | 1.82 | -0.01 | 0 | ||
2018-10-26 | 2018-09-30 | 1.64 | 1.64 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2018-07-25 | 2018-06-30 | 1.3 | 1.42 | 0.12 | 9 | ||
2018-04-24 | 2018-03-31 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.04 | 4 | ||
2018-02-16 | 2017-12-31 | 1.36 | 1.37 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2017-10-24 | 2017-09-30 | 1.29 | 1.33 | 0.04 | 3 | ||
2017-07-26 | 2017-06-30 | 0.99 | 1.0 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2017-04-25 | 2017-03-31 | 0.85 | 0.82 | -0.03 | 3 | ||
2017-02-02 | 2016-12-31 | 1.42 | 1.07 | -0.35 | 24 | ||
2016-10-25 | 2016-09-30 | 1.66 | 1.67 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2016-07-27 | 2016-06-30 | 1.54 | 1.56 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2016-04-26 | 2016-03-31 | 1.05 | 1.12 | 0.07 | 6 | ||
2016-02-02 | 2015-12-31 | 1.74 | 1.66 | -0.08 | 4 | ||
2015-10-22 | 2015-09-30 | 1.72 | 1.74 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2015-07-23 | 2015-06-30 | 1.62 | 1.65 | 0.03 | 1 | ||
2015-04-22 | 2015-03-31 | 1 | 1.08 | 0.08 | 8 | ||
2015-02-03 | 2014-12-31 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2014-10-22 | 2014-09-30 | 1.63 | 1.63 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2014-07-23 | 2014-06-30 | 1.4 | 1.44 | 0.04 | 2 | ||
2014-04-23 | 2014-03-31 | 0.87 | 0.92 | 0.05 | 5 | ||
2014-02-04 | 2013-12-31 | 1.29 | 1.35 | 0.06 | 4 | ||
2013-10-22 | 2013-09-30 | 1.44 | 1.46 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2013-07-23 | 2013-06-30 | 1.23 | 1.25 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2013-04-23 | 2013-03-31 | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2013-01-31 | 2012-12-31 | 1.1 | 1.17 | 0.07 | 6 | ||
2012-10-23 | 2012-09-30 | 1.18 | 1.28 | 0.1 | 8 | ||
2012-07-24 | 2012-06-30 | 0.93 | 1.0 | 0.07 | 7 | ||
2012-04-24 | 2012-03-31 | 0.58 | 0.59 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2012-02-02 | 2011-12-31 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2011-10-25 | 2011-09-30 | 1.02 | 1.09 | 0.07 | 6 | ||
2011-07-27 | 2011-06-30 | 0.77 | 0.92 | 0.15 | 19 | ||
2011-04-26 | 2011-03-31 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.07 | 15 | ||
2011-02-03 | 2010-12-31 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2010-10-21 | 2010-09-30 | 0.66 | 0.76 | 0.1 | 15 | ||
2010-07-23 | 2010-06-30 | 0.49 | 0.58 | 0.09 | 18 | ||
2010-04-21 | 2010-03-31 | 0.2 | 0.24 | 0.04 | 20 | ||
2010-02-03 | 2009-12-31 | 0.47 | 0.41 | -0.06 | 12 | ||
2009-10-22 | 2009-09-30 | 0.45 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 11 | ||
2009-07-23 | 2009-06-30 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.06 | 16 | ||
2009-04-22 | 2009-03-31 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.03 | 13 | ||
2009-02-04 | 2008-12-31 | 1.03 | 1.09 | 0.06 | 5 | ||
2008-10-22 | 2008-09-30 | 1.27 | 1.22 | -0.05 | 3 | ||
2008-07-23 | 2008-06-30 | 1.16 | 1.22 | 0.06 | 5 | ||
2008-04-23 | 2008-03-31 | 0.87 | 0.96 | 0.09 | 10 | ||
2008-02-01 | 2007-12-31 | 1.08 | 1.18 | 0.1 | 9 | ||
2007-10-24 | 2007-09-30 | 1.13 | 1.14 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2007-07-25 | 2007-06-30 | 1.07 | 1.07 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2007-04-25 | 2007-03-31 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2007-02-02 | 2006-12-31 | 1.09 | 1.09 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2006-10-25 | 2006-09-30 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 0.01 | 0 | ||
2006-07-27 | 2006-06-30 | 0.99 | 1.02 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2006-04-27 | 2006-03-31 | 0.68 | 0.75 | 0.07 | 10 | ||
2006-02-03 | 2005-12-31 | 0.94 | 0.93 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2005-10-26 | 2005-09-30 | 0.93 | 0.98 | 0.05 | 5 | ||
2005-07-28 | 2005-06-30 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2005-04-28 | 2005-03-31 | 0.59 | 0.62 | 0.03 | 5 | ||
2005-02-04 | 2004-12-31 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2004-10-25 | 2004-09-30 | 0.79 | 0.82 | 0.03 | 3 | ||
2004-07-23 | 2004-06-30 | 0.69 | 0.76 | 0.07 | 10 | ||
2004-04-26 | 2004-03-31 | 0.54 | 0.52 | -0.02 | 3 | ||
2004-02-05 | 2003-12-31 | 0.56 | 0.64 | 0.08 | 14 | ||
2003-10-22 | 2003-09-30 | 0.6 | 0.61 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2003-07-23 | 2003-06-30 | 0.52 | 0.54 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2003-04-23 | 2003-03-31 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 13 | ||
2003-02-06 | 2002-12-31 | 0.54 | 0.58 | 0.04 | 7 | ||
2002-10-23 | 2002-09-30 | 0.51 | 0.53 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
2002-07-24 | 2002-06-30 | 0.43 | 0.47 | 0.04 | 9 | ||
2002-04-24 | 2002-03-31 | 0.18 | 0.26 | 0.08 | 44 | ||
2002-02-07 | 2001-12-31 | 0.4 | 0.45 | 0.05 | 12 | ||
2001-10-24 | 2001-09-30 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2001-07-25 | 2001-06-30 | 0.38 | 0.42 | 0.04 | 10 | ||
2001-04-19 | 2001-03-31 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 20 | ||
2001-02-07 | 2000-12-31 | 0.46 | 0.51 | 0.05 | 10 | ||
2000-10-19 | 2000-09-30 | 0.55 | 0.6 | 0.05 | 9 | ||
2000-07-20 | 2000-06-30 | 0.49 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2000-04-20 | 2000-03-31 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2000-02-02 | 1999-12-31 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.07 | 13 | ||
1999-10-20 | 1999-09-30 | 0.39 | 0.55 | 0.16 | 41 | ||
1999-07-21 | 1999-06-30 | 0.45 | 0.43 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
1999-04-21 | 1999-03-31 | 0.33 | 0.31 | -0.02 | 6 | ||
1999-02-04 | 1998-12-31 | 0.58 | 0.55 | -0.03 | 5 | ||
1998-10-21 | 1998-09-30 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1998-07-21 | 1998-06-30 | 0.62 | 0.69 | 0.07 | 11 | ||
1998-04-21 | 1998-03-31 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1998-02-04 | 1997-12-31 | 0.63 | 0.64 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1997-10-20 | 1997-09-30 | 0.49 | 0.5 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
1997-07-21 | 1997-06-30 | 0.64 | 0.64 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-04-21 | 1997-03-31 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
1997-02-04 | 1996-12-31 | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1996-10-21 | 1996-09-30 | 0.47 | 0.42 | -0.05 | 10 | ||
1996-07-22 | 1996-06-30 | 0.61 | 0.54 | -0.07 | 11 | ||
1996-04-18 | 1996-03-31 | 0.18 | 0.13 | -0.05 | 27 | ||
1996-02-06 | 1995-12-31 | 0.56 | 0.71 | 0.15 | 26 |
Use Ryder System in pair-trading
Pair analysis around Ryder System matters because it can turn one security idea into a more market-neutral structure. The key question is whether the second leg adds real hedge value instead of just creating a more complex version of the same risk.
Ryder System Pair Trading
Ryder System Pair Trading Analysis
The effectiveness of tax-loss harvesting on Ryder System depends on finding a suitable replacement asset. Selling Ryder System at a loss and replacing it with a correlated asset preserves portfolio structure. By identifying an asset with near-identical factor exposures to Ryder System, investors maintain synthetic exposure. Stable, long-run correlations provide more reliable wash-sale substitutes for Ryder System.
The pairwise correlation of Ryder System measures the historical tendency for assets to move together. Investors use this measure to identify whether a new position would truly diversify a portfolio containing Ryder System. The correlation structure around Ryder System evolves as market regimes change over time. Portfolio managers use this data to identify redundant positions and find genuine complements to Ryder System.
The Correlation analysis framework supports pair trading and hedging evaluation for Ryder System.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Ryder System position
With 7.56 Billion market cap in the Rental & Leasing Services industry, Ryder System works well as a smaller-cap core holding around which broader thematic baskets can be built. For Ryder System in Rental & Leasing Services, the theme workflow defines the investment thesis first, then optimizes which Industrials assets best express that view at the smaller-cap level.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Asset Allocation ETFs Thematic Idea Now
Asset Allocation ETFs
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Asset Allocation ETFs theme has 196 constituents at this time.
Investors can hold the Asset Allocation ETFs Theme as a long-term basket or actively trade individual constituents to capture short-term price movement.
| View All Next | Launch |
Additional Tools for Ryder Stock Analysis
| Bond Analysis Evaluate and analyze corporate bonds as a potential investment for your portfolios. | |
| Earnings Calls Check upcoming earnings announcements updated hourly across public exchanges | |
| Economic Indicators Top statistical indicators that provide insights into how an economy is performing | |
| Premium Stories Follow Macroaxis premium stories from verified contributors across different equity types, categories and coverage scope | |
| Theme Ratings Determine theme ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis theme ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Price Transformation Use Price Transformation models to analyze the depth of different equity instruments across global markets | |
| Commodity Directory Find actively traded commodities issued by global exchanges | |
| Investing Opportunities Build portfolios using our predefined set of ideas and optimize them against your investing preferences | |
| Watchlist Optimization Optimize watchlists to build efficient portfolios or rebalance existing positions based on the mean-variance optimization algorithm |