QuickLogic Operating Margin vs. Net Income
| QUIK Stock | USD 9.07 0.07 0.78% |
QuickLogic Operating Profit Margin | -0.88 |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.21 | 0.2203 |
|
|
The profitability summary for QuickLogic compares income to revenue, assets, operating costs, and equity.
QuickLogic | Build portfolio with QuickLogic Stock |
QuickLogic's Revenue Allocation by Segment
QuickLogic reports income from 3 product segments. QuickLogic's revenue is anchored by Mature Products (1.08 Million, 46.6%), followed by New Products (953,000, 41.3%). While one segment leads, QuickLogic's remaining product lines provide a degree of revenue balance.
Your Equity Center.
Macro event markers
QuickLogic Revenue by Earnings Segment Summary
The breakdown below shows how QuickLogic's revenue is split across product segments for the most recent reporting period. At 12.1%, Hardware Products is the narrowest segment in QuickLogic's product mix.
Earnings estimates add context for valuation and forward-looking analysis. This context is informational and can be reviewed with other metrics across periods.
Earnings Share -0.76 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth -0.35 | Return On Assets | Return On Equity |
Understanding QuickLogic includes distinguishing between market value and book value, where book value reflects QuickLogic's accounting equity. QuickLogic's market capitalization is 156.82 M. QuickLogic P/B of 6.93 reflects a market valuation far exceeding accounting equity. Enterprise value stands at 155.01 M. Intrinsic value reflects what QuickLogic's fundamentals imply about worth, which may differ from both the trading price and the book figure. Analytical frameworks help reconcile those views.
Value and price for QuickLogic are related but not identical, and they can diverge across cycles. For QuickLogic, key inputs include a P/B ratio of 6.93, a profit margin of -56.7%, ROE of -42.14%, and revenue of 13.77 M. QuickLogic market price reflects the current exchange level formed by active bids and offers.
QuickLogic Net Income vs. Operating Margin Fundamental Analysis
Peer multiple analysis evaluates QuickLogic's pricing efficiency within its industry. QuickLogic is rated below average for operating margin within its peer group. It carries a third ranking for net income within its peer group . The current value of Operating Profit Margin is estimated at -0.88, reflecting a contracting pattern. During the previous reporting period, Operating Profit Margin was -0.8381. Relative valuation frameworks compare QuickLogic across key financial ratios.QuickLogic Net Income vs. Operating Margin
Operating Margin shows how much operating income a company makes on each dollar of sales. It is one of the profitability indicators which helps analysts to understand whether the firm is successful or not making money from everyday operations.
QuickLogic |
| = | -0.93 % |
A good Operating Margin is required for a company to be able to pay for its fixed costs or payout its debt, which implies that the higher the margin, the better. This ratio is most effective in evaluating the earning potential of a company over time when comparing it against a firm's competitors.
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
QuickLogic |
| = | -3.84 M |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
QuickLogic Net Income Comparison
QuickLogic is currently under evaluation for net income within its peer group.
QuickLogic Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in QuickLogic, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, QuickLogic will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of QuickLogic's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of QuickLogic, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Net Loss | -3.5 M | -3.6 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | 35 K | 33.2 K | |
| Operating Income | -11.5 M | -12.1 M | |
| Income Before Tax | -12.3 M | -12.9 M | |
| Net Loss | -3.8 M | -4 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -774 K | -812.7 K | |
| Net Loss | -4.4 M | -4.6 M | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | -254.2 K | -241.4 K | |
| Interest Income | 111.5 K | 104.9 K | |
| Net Interest Income | -366.3 K | -384.6 K | |
| Change To Netincome | 2 M | 1.8 M | |
| Net Loss | -0.91 | -0.87 | |
| Income Quality | -0.01 | -0.01 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 1.20 | 0.71 |
QuickLogic Profitability Driver Comparison
Profitability drivers are a critical input for any investor evaluating QuickLogic. Unexpected events - including regulatory changes, commodity price swings, and macroeconomic disruptions - can materially affect QuickLogic's profit outlook and significantly alter its long-term earnings trajectory.
Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The projected EPS for QuickLogic in the upcoming reporting period is -0.04, as estimated by professional analysts tracking QuickLogic. Individual analyst forecasts span from -0.05 to -0.03, indicating the range of analytical uncertainty. This consensus is derived from 12-month trailing data and is adjusted to remove non-recurring items.Last Reported EPS
-0.05 Lowest | Expected EPS | -0.03 Highest |
Earnings Projection Consensus
The consensus EPS valuation model for QuickLogic generates an estimated fair value that investors compare to the prevailing market price. A favorable gap - estimate above price - may indicate potential upside; an unfavorable gap may indicate downside risk. Both signals are scenario-based and should be interpreted with appropriate caution and fundamental due diligence.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 30th of June 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 3 | 61.26% | 0.0 | -0.04 | -0.76 |
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
QuickLogic's actual EPS history reveals the company's underlying profit trend over time - a critical input for valuation. Expected EPS for QuickLogic reflects what seasoned analysts believe the company will earn, forming the consensus benchmark. We use weighted share count to ensure the profitability signal is not distorted by temporary changes in shares outstanding.Estimated Months Earnings per Share
EPS is an important lens for income investors in QuickLogic because it quantifies per-share earning power - the foundation of any sustainable dividend. A rising EPS trend paired with disciplined capital allocation suggests growing dividend capacity over time. Use EPS alongside cash flow statements and peer-relative payout ratios for the most complete income risk assessment.Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
Each earnings release for QuickLogic is an inflection point where actual results are compared against what analysts projected. The surprise - whether a beat, miss, or in-line result - anchors the post-report narrative and near-term price path. Analyst EPS estimates are compiled through ongoing dialogue with management and bottom-up sector modeling.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
null | null | null | null | null | 0 | ||
2026-03-03 | 2025-12-31 | -0.03 | -0.21 | -0.18 | 600 | ||
2025-11-10 | 2025-09-30 | -0.2 | -0.19 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2025-08-12 | 2025-06-30 | -0.07 | -0.09 | -0.02 | 28 | ||
2025-05-13 | 2025-03-31 | -0.08 | -0.07 | 0.01 | 12 | ||
2025-02-25 | 2024-12-31 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 33 | ||
2024-11-11 | 2024-09-30 | -0.05 | -0.06 | -0.01 | 20 | ||
2024-08-13 | 2024-06-30 | 0.01 | -0.05 | -0.06 | 600 | ||
2024-05-13 | 2024-03-31 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.05 | 83 | ||
2024-02-27 | 2023-12-31 | 0.13 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 38 | ||
2023-11-14 | 2023-09-30 | 0.14 | 0.13 | -0.01 | 7 | ||
2023-08-14 | 2023-06-30 | -0.02 | -0.12 | -0.1 | 500 | ||
2023-05-16 | 2023-03-31 | -0.06 | -0.04 | 0.02 | 33 | ||
2023-02-27 | 2022-12-31 | -0.05 | -0.04 | 0.01 | 20 | ||
2022-11-15 | 2022-09-30 | -0.11 | -0.07 | 0.04 | 36 | ||
2022-08-16 | 2022-06-30 | -0.03 | -0.0422 | -0.0122 | 40 | ||
2022-05-17 | 2022-03-31 | -0.07 | -0.06 | 0.01 | 14 | ||
2022-02-16 | 2021-12-31 | -0.07 | -0.04 | 0.03 | 42 | ||
2021-11-17 | 2021-09-30 | -0.06 | -0.03 | 0.03 | 50 | ||
2021-08-17 | 2021-06-30 | -0.15 | -0.16 | -0.01 | 6 | ||
2021-05-18 | 2021-03-31 | -0.07 | -0.12 | -0.05 | 71 | ||
2021-02-17 | 2020-12-31 | -0.13 | -0.15 | -0.02 | 15 | ||
2020-11-04 | 2020-09-30 | -0.19 | -0.15 | 0.04 | 21 | ||
2020-08-05 | 2020-06-30 | -0.24 | -0.26 | -0.02 | 8 | ||
2020-05-11 | 2020-03-31 | -0.29 | -0.37 | -0.08 | 27 | ||
2020-02-12 | 2019-12-31 | -0.31 | -0.29 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2019-11-06 | 2019-09-30 | -0.56 | -0.42 | 0.14 | 25 | ||
2019-08-07 | 2019-06-30 | -0.56 | -0.56 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2019-05-08 | 2019-03-31 | -0.42 | -0.42 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2019-02-13 | 2018-12-31 | -0.42 | -0.42 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2018-11-07 | 2018-09-30 | -0.42 | -0.42 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2018-08-08 | 2018-06-30 | -0.56 | -0.56 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2018-05-09 | 2018-03-31 | -0.56 | -0.56 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2018-02-14 | 2017-12-31 | -0.51 | -0.56 | -0.05 | 9 | ||
2017-11-08 | 2017-09-30 | -0.56 | -0.56 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2017-08-09 | 2017-06-30 | -0.61 | -0.56 | 0.05 | 8 | ||
2017-05-10 | 2017-03-31 | -0.7 | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2017-02-15 | 2016-12-31 | -0.84 | -0.7 | 0.14 | 16 | ||
2016-11-02 | 2016-09-30 | -0.84 | -0.84 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2016-08-03 | 2016-06-30 | -1.05 | -0.98 | 0.07 | 6 | ||
2016-05-04 | 2016-03-31 | -1.12 | -1.12 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2016-02-10 | 2015-12-31 | -1.12 | -1.12 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2015-10-28 | 2015-09-30 | -1.12 | -1.12 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2015-07-29 | 2015-06-30 | -0.98 | -0.84 | 0.14 | 14 | ||
2015-04-29 | 2015-03-31 | -0.91 | -0.84 | 0.07 | 7 | ||
2015-02-04 | 2014-12-31 | -0.84 | -0.84 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2014-10-29 | 2014-09-30 | -1.12 | -0.84 | 0.28 | 25 | ||
2014-07-30 | 2014-06-30 | -0.7 | -0.7 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2014-04-30 | 2014-03-31 | -0.56 | -0.56 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2014-02-05 | 2013-12-31 | -0.63 | -0.84 | -0.21 | 33 | ||
2013-10-30 | 2013-09-30 | -0.7 | -0.56 | 0.14 | 20 | ||
2013-07-31 | 2013-06-30 | -0.84 | -0.98 | -0.14 | 16 | ||
2013-05-01 | 2013-03-31 | -0.84 | -1.12 | -0.28 | 33 | ||
2012-10-30 | 2012-09-30 | -1.12 | -0.84 | 0.28 | 25 | ||
2012-07-31 | 2012-06-30 | -1.26 | -1.12 | 0.14 | 11 | ||
2012-05-01 | 2012-03-31 | -1.31 | -1.4 | -0.09 | 6 | ||
2012-02-07 | 2011-12-31 | -1.21 | -1.12 | 0.09 | 7 | ||
2011-11-01 | 2011-09-30 | -0.42 | -0.42 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2011-08-02 | 2011-06-30 | -0.28 | -0.56 | -0.28 | 100 | ||
2011-05-03 | 2011-03-31 | -0.28 | -0.14 | 0.14 | 50 | ||
2011-02-08 | 2010-12-31 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2010-08-03 | 2010-06-30 | -0.28 | 0.14 | 0.42 | 150 | ||
2010-05-06 | 2010-03-31 | -0.7 | -0.14 | 0.56 | 80 | ||
2009-10-27 | 2009-09-30 | -1.12 | -0.84 | 0.28 | 25 | ||
2009-07-28 | 2009-06-30 | -0.98 | -1.26 | -0.28 | 28 | ||
2009-04-28 | 2009-03-31 | -0.7 | -0.56 | 0.14 | 20 | ||
2009-02-03 | 2008-12-31 | -0.56 | -0.56 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2008-10-23 | 2008-09-30 | -0.84 | -0.14 | 0.7 | 83 | ||
2008-07-23 | 2008-06-30 | -0.98 | -0.42 | 0.56 | 57 | ||
2008-04-24 | 2008-03-31 | -0.42 | -0.28 | 0.14 | 33 | ||
2008-01-30 | 2007-12-31 | -1.26 | -0.56 | 0.7 | 55 | ||
2007-10-24 | 2007-09-30 | -1.26 | -0.56 | 0.7 | 55 | ||
2007-07-25 | 2007-06-30 | -1.26 | -0.84 | 0.42 | 33 | ||
2007-04-26 | 2007-03-31 | -1.82 | -2.66 | -0.84 | 46 | ||
2007-01-31 | 2006-12-31 | -1.03 | -1.54 | -0.51 | 49 | ||
2006-12-22 | 2006-09-30 | -0.89 | -0.84 | 0.05 | 5 | ||
2006-04-26 | 2006-03-31 | -0.98 | -0.42 | 0.56 | 57 | ||
2006-02-01 | 2005-12-31 | -0.49 | -0.28 | 0.21 | 42 | ||
2005-10-26 | 2005-09-30 | 0.14 | 0.84 | 0.7 | 500 | ||
2005-04-27 | 2005-03-31 | -0.42 | 0.42 | 0.84 | 200 | ||
2005-02-02 | 2004-12-31 | -0.84 | -0.7 | 0.14 | 16 | ||
2004-10-27 | 2004-09-30 | -0.84 | -0.42 | 0.42 | 50 | ||
2004-07-21 | 2004-06-30 | -1.26 | -0.28 | 0.98 | 77 | ||
2004-04-21 | 2004-03-31 | -1.12 | -0.84 | 0.28 | 25 | ||
2004-01-28 | 2003-12-31 | -1.12 | -1.4 | -0.28 | 25 | ||
2003-10-22 | 2003-09-30 | -0.98 | -0.42 | 0.56 | 57 | ||
2003-07-23 | 2003-06-30 | -1.26 | -0.42 | 0.84 | 66 | ||
2003-04-23 | 2003-03-31 | -1.68 | -0.98 | 0.7 | 41 | ||
2003-01-29 | 2002-12-31 | -2.19 | -1.4 | 0.79 | 36 | ||
2002-10-23 | 2002-09-30 | -2.38 | -1.96 | 0.42 | 17 | ||
2002-07-24 | 2002-06-30 | -2.24 | -1.82 | 0.42 | 18 | ||
2002-04-24 | 2002-03-31 | -2.66 | -2.24 | 0.42 | 15 | ||
2002-01-23 | 2001-12-31 | -2.66 | -2.94 | -0.28 | 10 | ||
2001-10-24 | 2001-09-30 | -2.9 | -3.08 | -0.18 | 6 | ||
2001-07-25 | 2001-06-30 | -1.61 | -2.94 | -1.33 | 82 | ||
2001-04-25 | 2001-03-31 | 0.49 | -0.56 | -1.05 | 214 | ||
2001-01-24 | 2000-12-31 | 2.15 | 1.26 | -0.89 | 41 | ||
2000-10-25 | 2000-09-30 | 1.96 | 2.1 | 0.14 | 7 | ||
2000-07-26 | 2000-06-30 | 1.68 | 1.68 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2000-04-26 | 2000-03-31 | 0.98 | 1.26 | 0.28 | 28 | ||
2000-01-26 | 1999-12-31 | 0.65 | 0.98 | 0.33 | 50 |
Use QuickLogic in pair-trading
Using QuickLogic in a pair-trading setup can improve risk control because gains and losses are judged against a second position instead of against the market alone. The key question is whether the second leg adds real hedge value instead of just creating a more complex version of the same risk.
QuickLogic Pair Trading
QuickLogic Pair Trading Analysis
Finding correlated alternatives to QuickLogic is a practical necessity for tax-aware investors. The wash-sale rule prohibits repurchasing QuickLogic within 30 days of a loss sale, making it essential to identify substitute holdings with similar risk profiles.
The statistical relationship between QuickLogic and other instruments is summarized by the correlation coefficient. Investors use this measure to identify whether adding a new position would truly diversify a portfolio already containing QuickLogic.
Correlation analysis and pair trading evaluation for QuickLogic can be used to frame hedging context. This approach is commonly reviewed within sectors and across broader groups.Use Investing Themes to Complement your QuickLogic position
With 156.82 Million market cap in the Semiconductors industry, QuickLogic works well as a smaller-cap core holding around which broader thematic baskets can be built. Building a Technology theme from QuickLogic 156.82 Million position turns a single Semiconductors conviction into a risk-managed basket.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Consumer Staples ETFs Thematic Idea Now
Consumer Staples ETFs
ETF themes focus on helping investors to gain exposure to a broad range of assets, diversify, and lower overall costs. The Consumer Staples ETFs theme has 15 constituents at this time.
Investors can hold the Consumer Staples ETFs Theme as a long-term basket or actively trade individual constituents to capture short-term price movement.
| View All Next | Launch |