Lockheed Martin Net Income vs. Number Of Shares Shorted
| LMT Stock | USD 642.20 5.87 0.92% |
Net Income | First Reported 1994-03-31 | Previous Quarter 1.6 B | Current Value 1.3 B | Quarterly Volatility 621.9 M |
Macro event markers
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.0767 | 0.1015 |
|
| |||||
| Operating Profit Margin | 0.0779 | 0.103 |
|
| |||||
| Pretax Profit Margin | 0.065 | 0.0789 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Assets | 0.0566 | 0.0838 |
|
|
Profitability analysis for Lockheed Martin uses margins and return ratios to relate income to revenue, assets, operating costs, and equity.
Lockheed | Build portfolio with Lockheed Stock |
Revenue by Product Segment
Lockheed Martin's revenue is distributed across 4 distinct product categories. At 15.94 Billion, Aeronautics is Lockheed Martin's largest segment (41.4%), with Rotary and Mission Systems as the second-largest at 8.61 Billion. Lockheed Martin's product mix shows a clear leader but retains enough breadth to absorb segment-specific headwinds.
Correlation Analysis.
Macro event markers
Lockheed Martin Revenue Breakdown by Earning Segment Snapshot
Lockheed Martin's product-level revenue split is shown below, highlighting each segment's share of total revenue. On the smaller end, Space contributes 16.8% to Lockheed Martin's revenue.
Earnings estimates provide context for forward-looking performance discussion. This view provides informational context for Lockheed Martin earnings expectations over time.
Quarterly Earnings Growth 1.61 | Dividend Share 13.35 | Earnings Share 21.19 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth 0.091 |
Market capitalization and book value offer complementary views of Lockheed Martin - the first driven by investor sentiment, the second by accounting standards. Lockheed Martin's market capitalization is 147.25 B. The 22.09 P/B ratio shows Lockheed Martin carries a substantial premium over its balance-sheet equity. Enterprise value stands at 166.03 B. Intrinsic value represents an estimate of underlying worth and can differ from both market price and book value. Valuation methods compare these perspectives to frame context.
Note that Lockheed Martin's intrinsic value and market price are different measures derived from different inputs. For Lockheed Martin, key inputs include a P/E ratio of 19.51, a P/B ratio of 22.09, a profit margin of 6.69%, and ROE of 76.87%. Lockheed Martin market price reflects the current exchange level formed by active bids and offers.
Lockheed Martin Number Of Shares Shorted vs. Net Income Fundamental Analysis
Cross-company financial ratios help determine Lockheed Martin's valuation standing. Lockheed Martin maintains a second standing in net income relative to competitors. It is rated below average in number of shares shorted relative to competitors . For Lockheed Martin, Net Income stands at 1,832 times Number Of Shares Shorted. Annualized trend data shows Net Income progressing by roughly 64.38%. Year-ago financials show Lockheed Martin with Net Income of 5.02 Billion. Comparative metrics assess Lockheed Martin's relative pricing efficiency.Lockheed Number Of Shares Shorted vs. Net Income
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Lockheed Martin |
| = | 5.02 B |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Number of Shares Shorted is the total amount of shares that are currently sold short by investors. When a stock is sold short, the short seller assumes the responsibility of repurchasing the stock at a lower price. The speculator will make money if the stock goes down in price or will experience a loss if the stock price goes up.
Lockheed Martin |
| = | 2.74 M |
If a large number of investors decide to short sell an equity instrument within a small period of time, their combined action can significantly affect the price of the stock.
Lockheed Number Of Shares Shorted Comparison
Lockheed Martin is currently under evaluation in number of shares shorted relative to competitors.
Lockheed Martin Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Lockheed Martin, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Lockheed Martin will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Lockheed Martin's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Lockheed Martin, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -7.5 B | -7.9 B | |
| Operating Income | 7.7 B | 4.8 B | |
| Income Before Tax | 5.9 B | 4.1 B | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -1.8 B | -1.7 B | |
| Net Income | 5 B | 3 B | |
| Income Tax Expense | 905 M | 975 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 5 B | 4 B | |
| Net Income From Continuing Ops | 5 B | 5 B | |
| Non Operating Income Net Other | -66.6 M | -69.9 M | |
| Interest Income | 1.1 B | 797.3 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -1.1 B | -1.2 B | |
| Change To Netincome | 1.1 B | 574.9 M | |
| Net Income Per Share | 21.73 | 22.81 | |
| Income Quality | 1.71 | 1.79 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 0.85 | 0.89 |
Lockheed Profitability Driver Comparison
The profitability drivers of Lockheed Martin are the most direct determinants of its earnings and investment outlook. Investors face many external uncertainties - from tax policy changes to commodity price movements - that can affect Lockheed Martin's profitability during any given holding period.
Earnings Estimation Breakdown
Analyst consensus points to a next EPS of 6.82 for Lockheed Martin, supported by trailing twelve-month earnings data from Lockheed Martin. The full range of analyst projections spans 6.5585 to 7.25, quantifying the uncertainty in the forward estimate. One-time items are stripped from this figure to reflect the ongoing earnings run rate.Last Reported EPS
6.56 Lowest | Expected EPS | 7.25 Highest |
Earnings Projection Consensus
When analyst consensus implies a fair value for Lockheed Martin above today's price, it creates a positive valuation gap that some investors associate with upside potential. A fair value below the current price does not automatically mean overvalued - growth-oriented stocks often trade above near-term earnings models. Use this signal as a starting point for deeper due diligence, not a standalone investment decision.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 31st of March 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 21 | 78.23% | 5.8 | 6.82 | 21.19 |
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
Actual Earnings per Share of Lockheed Martin refers to what the company shows during its earnings calls or quarterly reports. The Expected EPS is what analysts covering Lockheed Martin predict the company's earnings will be in the future. The higher the earnings per share of Lockheed Martin, the better its profitability. While calculating the Earnings per Share, we use the weighted ratio, as the number of shares outstanding can change over time.Estimated Months Earnings per Share
Investors seeking income from Lockheed Martin should treat EPS as a first-order signal of dividend sustainability, but not the only one. Cash flow from operations, capital expenditure requirements, and debt obligations all influence the effective dividend capacity beyond what EPS alone reveals. A peer-relative EPS comparison adds a sector-adjusted dimension to income risk analysis.Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
The earnings surprise mechanism works because analyst consensus sets the market's reference point before each Lockheed Martin report. Reported EPS that exceeds this reference triggers upward repricing; EPS below it triggers downward adjustment. Analyst consensus reflects the aggregated output of models that track guidance, comparables, and macro assumptions.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2026-01-29 | 2025-12-31 | 5.96 | 5.8 | -0.16 | 2 | ||
2025-10-21 | 2025-09-30 | 6.35 | 6.95 | 0.6 | 9 | ||
2025-07-22 | 2025-06-30 | 6.47 | 1.46 | -5.01 | 77 | ||
2025-04-22 | 2025-03-31 | 6.32 | 7.28 | 0.96 | 15 | ||
2025-01-28 | 2024-12-31 | 6.6 | 2.22 | -4.38 | 66 | ||
2024-10-22 | 2024-09-30 | 6.44 | 6.84 | 0.4 | 6 | ||
2024-07-23 | 2024-06-30 | 6.45 | 7.11 | 0.66 | 10 | ||
2024-04-23 | 2024-03-31 | 5.83 | 6.33 | 0.5 | 8 | ||
2024-01-23 | 2023-12-31 | 7.25 | 7.9 | 0.65 | 8 | ||
2023-10-17 | 2023-09-30 | 6.64 | 6.77 | 0.13 | 1 | ||
2023-07-18 | 2023-06-30 | 6.45 | 6.73 | 0.28 | 4 | ||
2023-04-18 | 2023-03-31 | 6.04 | 6.61 | 0.57 | 9 | ||
2023-01-24 | 2022-12-31 | 7.37 | 7.79 | 0.42 | 5 | ||
2022-10-18 | 2022-09-30 | 6.72 | 6.87 | 0.15 | 2 | ||
2022-07-19 | 2022-06-30 | 6.39 | 6.32 | -0.07 | 1 | ||
2022-04-19 | 2022-03-31 | 6.18 | 6.44 | 0.26 | 4 | ||
2022-01-25 | 2021-12-31 | 7.14 | 7.24 | 0.1 | 1 | ||
2021-10-26 | 2021-09-30 | 1.99 | 2.21 | 0.22 | 11 | ||
2021-07-26 | 2021-06-30 | 6.52 | 6.52 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2021-04-20 | 2021-03-31 | 6.31 | 6.56 | 0.25 | 3 | ||
2021-01-26 | 2020-12-31 | 6.41 | 6.38 | -0.03 | 0 | ||
2020-10-20 | 2020-09-30 | 6.1 | 6.25 | 0.15 | 2 | ||
2020-07-21 | 2020-06-30 | 5.71 | 5.79 | 0.08 | 1 | ||
2020-04-21 | 2020-03-31 | 5.84 | 6.08 | 0.24 | 4 | ||
2020-01-28 | 2019-12-31 | 5.04 | 5.29 | 0.25 | 4 | ||
2019-10-22 | 2019-09-30 | 5.03 | 5.66 | 0.63 | 12 | ||
2019-07-23 | 2019-06-30 | 4.74 | 5.0 | 0.26 | 5 | ||
2019-04-23 | 2019-03-31 | 4.34 | 5.99 | 1.65 | 38 | ||
2019-01-29 | 2018-12-31 | 4.41 | 4.39 | -0.02 | 0 | ||
2018-10-23 | 2018-09-30 | 4.31 | 5.14 | 0.83 | 19 | ||
2018-07-24 | 2018-06-30 | 3.92 | 4.05 | 0.13 | 3 | ||
2018-04-24 | 2018-03-31 | 3.36 | 4.02 | 0.66 | 19 | ||
2018-01-29 | 2017-12-31 | 4.03 | 4.3 | 0.27 | 6 | ||
2017-10-24 | 2017-09-30 | 3.27 | 3.24 | -0.03 | 0 | ||
2017-07-18 | 2017-06-30 | 3.08 | 3.23 | 0.15 | 4 | ||
2017-04-25 | 2017-03-31 | 2.79 | 2.61 | -0.18 | 6 | ||
2017-01-24 | 2016-12-31 | 3.04 | 3.25 | 0.21 | 6 | ||
2016-10-25 | 2016-09-30 | 2.87 | 3.61 | 0.74 | 25 | ||
2016-07-19 | 2016-06-30 | 2.93 | 3.28 | 0.35 | 11 | ||
2016-04-26 | 2016-03-31 | 2.61 | 2.58 | -0.03 | 1 | ||
2016-01-26 | 2015-12-31 | 2.95 | 3.01 | 0.06 | 2 | ||
2015-10-20 | 2015-09-30 | 2.72 | 2.77 | 0.05 | 1 | ||
2015-07-20 | 2015-06-30 | 2.66 | 2.94 | 0.28 | 10 | ||
2015-04-21 | 2015-03-31 | 2.49 | 2.74 | 0.25 | 10 | ||
2015-01-27 | 2014-12-31 | 2.85 | 3.01 | 0.16 | 5 | ||
2014-10-21 | 2014-09-30 | 2.72 | 2.76 | 0.04 | 1 | ||
2014-07-22 | 2014-06-30 | 2.66 | 2.76 | 0.1 | 3 | ||
2014-04-22 | 2014-03-31 | 2.53 | 2.87 | 0.34 | 13 | ||
2014-01-23 | 2013-12-31 | 1.95 | 2.04 | 0.09 | 4 | ||
2013-10-22 | 2013-09-30 | 2.27 | 2.57 | 0.3 | 13 | ||
2013-07-23 | 2013-06-30 | 2.2 | 2.64 | 0.44 | 20 | ||
2013-04-23 | 2013-03-31 | 2.04 | 2.33 | 0.29 | 14 | ||
2013-01-24 | 2012-12-31 | 1.82 | 1.78 | -0.04 | 2 | ||
2012-10-24 | 2012-09-30 | 1.85 | 2.26 | 0.41 | 22 | ||
2012-07-24 | 2012-06-30 | 1.91 | 2.38 | 0.47 | 24 | ||
2012-04-26 | 2012-03-31 | 1.71 | 2.03 | 0.32 | 18 | ||
2012-01-26 | 2011-12-31 | 1.95 | 2.14 | 0.19 | 9 | ||
2011-10-26 | 2011-09-30 | 1.81 | 2.06 | 0.25 | 13 | ||
2011-07-26 | 2011-06-30 | 1.91 | 2.06 | 0.15 | 7 | ||
2011-04-26 | 2011-03-31 | 1.51 | 1.55 | 0.04 | 2 | ||
2011-01-27 | 2010-12-31 | 2.08 | 2.38 | 0.3 | 14 | ||
2010-10-19 | 2010-09-30 | 1.59 | 1.87 | 0.28 | 17 | ||
2010-07-27 | 2010-06-30 | 1.78 | 1.96 | 0.18 | 10 | ||
2010-04-21 | 2010-03-31 | 1.42 | 1.7 | 0.28 | 19 | ||
2010-01-28 | 2009-12-31 | 1.99 | 2.17 | 0.18 | 9 | ||
2009-10-20 | 2009-09-30 | 1.83 | 2.07 | 0.24 | 13 | ||
2009-07-21 | 2009-06-30 | 1.81 | 1.88 | 0.07 | 3 | ||
2009-04-21 | 2009-03-31 | 1.64 | 1.68 | 0.04 | 2 | ||
2009-01-22 | 2008-12-31 | 1.92 | 1.97 | 0.05 | 2 | ||
2008-10-21 | 2008-09-30 | 1.89 | 1.85 | -0.04 | 2 | ||
2008-07-22 | 2008-06-30 | 1.89 | 2.15 | 0.26 | 13 | ||
2008-04-22 | 2008-03-31 | 1.63 | 1.73 | 0.1 | 6 | ||
2008-01-24 | 2007-12-31 | 1.7 | 1.89 | 0.19 | 11 | ||
2007-10-23 | 2007-09-30 | 1.64 | 1.8 | 0.16 | 9 | ||
2007-07-24 | 2007-06-30 | 1.53 | 1.78 | 0.25 | 16 | ||
2007-04-24 | 2007-03-31 | 1.37 | 1.39 | 0.02 | 1 | ||
2007-01-25 | 2006-12-31 | 1.46 | 1.68 | 0.22 | 15 | ||
2006-10-24 | 2006-09-30 | 1.24 | 1.46 | 0.22 | 17 | ||
2006-07-25 | 2006-06-30 | 1.16 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 15 | ||
2006-04-25 | 2006-03-31 | 1.15 | 1.34 | 0.19 | 16 | ||
2006-01-26 | 2005-12-31 | 1.15 | 1.12 | -0.03 | 2 | ||
2005-10-25 | 2005-09-30 | 0.9 | 0.96 | 0.06 | 6 | ||
2005-07-26 | 2005-06-30 | 0.83 | 0.96 | 0.13 | 15 | ||
2005-04-26 | 2005-03-31 | 0.75 | 0.8 | 0.05 | 6 | ||
2005-01-27 | 2004-12-31 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.11 | 14 | ||
2004-10-26 | 2004-09-30 | 0.66 | 0.69 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
2004-07-27 | 2004-06-30 | 0.61 | 0.66 | 0.05 | 8 | ||
2004-04-27 | 2004-03-31 | 0.53 | 0.65 | 0.12 | 22 | ||
2004-01-27 | 2003-12-31 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2003-10-28 | 2003-09-30 | 0.53 | 0.66 | 0.13 | 24 | ||
2003-07-24 | 2003-06-30 | 0.52 | 0.6 | 0.08 | 15 | ||
2003-04-22 | 2003-03-31 | 0.42 | 0.55 | 0.13 | 30 | ||
2003-01-24 | 2002-12-31 | 0.81 | 0.85 | 0.04 | 4 | ||
2002-10-25 | 2002-09-30 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-07-18 | 2002-06-30 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2002-04-23 | 2002-03-31 | 0.48 | 0.5 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2002-01-25 | 2001-12-31 | 0.48 | 0.49 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2001-10-26 | 2001-09-30 | 0.37 | 0.41 | 0.04 | 10 | ||
2001-07-26 | 2001-06-30 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 13 | ||
2001-04-24 | 2001-03-31 | 0.21 | 0.23 | 0.02 | 9 | ||
2001-01-25 | 2000-12-31 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.02 | 5 | ||
2000-10-26 | 2000-09-30 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.04 | 16 | ||
2000-07-20 | 2000-06-30 | 0.2 | 0.29 | 0.09 | 45 | ||
2000-04-25 | 2000-03-31 | 0.1 | 0.12 | 0.02 | 20 | ||
2000-01-28 | 1999-12-31 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1999-10-29 | 1999-09-30 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
1999-07-20 | 1999-06-30 | -0.13 | -0.11 | 0.02 | 15 | ||
1999-04-20 | 1999-03-31 | 0.52 | 0.51 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
1999-01-28 | 1998-12-31 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1998-10-20 | 1998-09-30 | 0.85 | 0.84 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
1998-07-21 | 1998-06-30 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1998-04-21 | 1998-03-31 | 0.72 | 0.71 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
1998-01-20 | 1997-12-31 | 0.89 | 0.9 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1997-10-21 | 1997-09-30 | 0.77 | 0.76 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
1997-07-22 | 1997-06-30 | 0.71 | 0.7 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
1997-04-22 | 1997-03-31 | 0.65 | 0.67 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
1997-01-21 | 1996-12-31 | 0.73 | 0.74 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1996-10-22 | 1996-09-30 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1996-07-23 | 1996-06-30 | 0.63 | 0.67 | 0.04 | 6 | ||
1996-04-24 | 1996-03-31 | 0.59 | 0.61 | 0.02 | 3 | ||
1996-01-22 | 1995-12-31 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
1995-10-23 | 1995-09-30 | 0.63 | 0.65 | 0.02 | 3 |
Use Lockheed Martin in pair-trading
Pair trading with Lockheed Martin can help investors hedge some company-specific exposure by balancing a long view with an offsetting position. The advantage is that adverse movement in one leg may be partly offset by the other when correlation and thesis alignment hold.
Lockheed Martin Pair Trading
Lockheed Martin Pair Trading Analysis
Correlation matrices help investors optimize their Lockheed Martin tax-loss harvesting strategy by identifying the best available substitutes. The higher the correlation to Lockheed Martin, the less the portfolio's risk profile will shift during the wash-sale waiting period.
The pairwise correlation of Lockheed Martin measures the historical tendency for two assets to move in the same or opposite directions. High correlations between Lockheed Martin and another holding indicate concentrated risk that may amplify losses in adverse market conditions.
Correlation analysis and pair evaluation for Lockheed Martin can support hedging context. The approach can be applied within sectors or across broader universes.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Lockheed Martin position
Lockheed Martin Industrials sector classification and 147.25 Billion large-cap scale make it a natural anchor for themes targeting Aerospace & Defense exposure. For Lockheed Martin in Aerospace & Defense, the theme workflow defines the investment thesis first, then optimizes which Industrials assets best express that view at the large-cap level.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Macroaxis Index Thematic Idea Now
Macroaxis Index
An experimental equal-weighted index theme of selected equities generated based on Macroaxis rating and scoring system. The Macroaxis Index theme has 52 constituents at this time.
Explore the Macroaxis Index Theme as a thematic allocation that can be optimized for return targets or risk constraints.
| View All Next | Launch |
Additional Tools for Lockheed Stock Analysis
| Fundamentals Comparison Compare fundamentals across multiple equities to find investing opportunities | |
| Portfolio Dashboard Portfolio dashboard that provides centralized access to all your investments | |
| Content Syndication Quickly integrate customizable finance content to your own investment portal | |
| Pattern Recognition Use different Pattern Recognition models to time the market across multiple global exchanges | |
| Positions Ratings Determine portfolio positions ratings based on digital equity recommendations. Macroaxis instant position ratings are based on combination of fundamental analysis and risk-adjusted market performance | |
| Stock Tickers Use high-impact, comprehensive, and customizable stock tickers that can be easily integrated to any websites | |
| Global Markets Map Get a quick overview of global market snapshot using zoomable world map. Drill down to check world indexes | |
| USA ETFs Find actively traded Exchange Traded Funds (ETF) in USA | |
| Portfolio Rebalancing Analyze risk-adjusted returns against different time horizons to find asset-allocation targets |