Jack In Price To Book vs. Net Income
| JACK Stock | USD 11.60 -0.90 -7.20% |
| Current Value | Last Year | Change From Last Year | 10 Year Trend | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gross Profit Margin | 0.19 | 0.2946 |
|
| |||||
| Return On Equity | 0.0409 | 0.0431 |
|
|
The view summarizes Jack In profitability using ratios that relate earnings to revenue, assets, and equity.
Jack In's Revenue Composition by Segment
Jack In generates revenue across 6 reported product segments. Restaurant Sales leads at 131.91 Million, representing roughly 37.7% of the total, followed by Franchise at 97.39 Million (27.9%). No single product line dominates, which gives Jack In's revenue profile a degree of built-in diversification.
Risk vs Return Analysis.
Macro event markers
Jack In Revenue by Earnings Segment Snapshot
The breakdown below shows how Jack In's revenue is split across product segments for the most recent reporting period. Franchise Fees rounds out the mix at 0.5%, representing Jack In's smallest reported product line.
Earnings estimates provide context for forward-looking performance discussion. This view provides informational context for Jack In earnings expectations over time.
Quarterly Earnings Growth -0.74 | Dividend Share 0.44 | Earnings Share -4.24 | Revenue Per Share | Quarterly Revenue Growth -0.06 |
Investors evaluate Jack In using market value and book value, each describing different facets of the business. Jack In's market capitalization is 244.14 M. The 168.79 P/B ratio shows Jack In carries a substantial premium over its balance-sheet equity. Enterprise value stands at 2.8 B. Intrinsic value represents an estimate of underlying worth and can differ from both market price and book value. Valuation methods compare these perspectives to frame context.
Note that Jack In's intrinsic value and market price are different measures derived from different inputs. For Jack In, key inputs include a P/E ratio of 12.59, a P/B ratio of 168.79, a profit margin of -8.09%, and revenue of 1.47 B. Jack In market price reflects the current exchange level formed by active bids and offers.
Jack In Net Income vs. Price To Book Fundamental Analysis
Cross-company financial ratios help determine Jack In's valuation standing. Jack In The sits atop the peer group for price to book within its peer group. It is rated below average for net income within its peer group . Net Loss is evolving in line with broader financial reporting trends. Year-ago financials show Jack In with Net Loss of -92.83 Million. Earnings-based multiples benchmark Jack In's market valuation.Jack Net Income vs. Price To Book
Price to Book (P/B) ratio is used to relate a company book value to its current market price. A high P/B ratio indicates that investors expect executives to generate more returns on their investments from a given set of assets. Book value is the accounting value of assets minus liabilities.
Jack In |
| = | 168.79 X |
Price to Book ratio is mostly used in financial services industries where assets and liabilities are typically represented by dollars. Although low Price to Book ratio generally implies that the firm is undervalued, it is often a good indicator that the company may be in financial or managerial distress and should be investigated more carefully.
Net income is the profit of a company for the reporting period, which is derived after taking revenues and gains and subtracting all expenses and losses. Net income is one of the most-watched numbers by money managers as well as individual investors.
Jack In |
| = | -80.72 M |
Because income is reported on the Income Statement of a company and is measured in dollars some investors prefer to use Profit Margin, which measures income as a percentage of sales.
Jack Net Income Comparison
Jack In is currently under evaluation for net income within its peer group.
Jack In Profitability Projections
The most important aspect of a successful company is its ability to generate a profit. For investors in Jack In, profitability is also one of the essential criteria for including it into their portfolios because, without profit, Jack In will eventually generate negative long term returns. The profitability progress is the general direction of Jack In's change in net profit over the period of time. It can combine multiple indicators of Jack In, where stable trends show no significant progress. An accelerating trend is seen as positive, while a decreasing one is unfavorable. A rising trend means that profits are rising, and operational efficiency may be rising as well. A decreasing trend is a sign of poor performance and may indicate upcoming losses.
| Last Reported | Projected for Next Year | ||
| Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income | -57.3 M | -60.2 M | |
| Operating Income | -20.8 M | -19.7 M | |
| Income Before Tax | -118.2 M | -112.3 M | |
| Total Other Income Expense Net | -76.3 M | -72.5 M | |
| Net Loss | -92.8 M | -88.2 M | |
| Income Tax Expense | -25.4 M | -24.2 M | |
| Net Income Applicable To Common Shares | 133.1 M | 109.8 M | |
| Net Loss | -72.6 M | -69 M | |
| Interest Income | 1.5 M | 2.1 M | |
| Net Interest Income | -71 M | -74.6 M | |
| Change To Netincome | 11 M | 11.6 M | |
| Net Loss | -1.86 | -1.77 | |
| Income Quality | -1.88 | -1.78 | |
| Net Income Per E B T | 8.49 | 8.91 |
Jack Profitability Driver Comparison
Understanding Jack In's profitability drivers is essential for assessing the sustainability of its earnings. Unexpected events such as tax policy changes, commodity price shocks, or economic downturns can materially alter the profit outlook and affect long-term investment returns.
Earnings Estimation Breakdown
The forward EPS consensus for Jack In stands at 0.9758, compiled from analyst models tracking Jack In's revenue, margin, and guidance trends. The estimate range spans from 0.8336 to 1.22, capturing uncertainty around the projection. This figure is derived from a 12-month earnings base and strips out one-time items for comparability.Last Reported EPS
0.83 Lowest | Expected EPS | 1.22 Highest |
Earnings Projection Consensus
The spread between Jack In's estimated fair value and its market price encodes a directional signal: narrow spreads suggest efficient pricing; wide spreads suggest a potential catalyst or mispricing. Analysts use this gap to identify entry and exit points, though the estimate itself carries model risk. Factor in liquidity, sector context, and macro environment before acting on this comparison.
| Number of Analysts | Historical Accuracy | Last Reported EPS | Estimated EPS for 30th of June 2026 | Current EPS (TTM) | |
| 21 | 79.12% | 0.0 | 0.9758 | -4.24 |
Earnings History
Analyst consensus earnings for Jack represent the collective market expectation for upcoming reporting periods. When actual EPS exceeds this benchmark, markets typically respond positively; misses often lead to rapid repricing. Comparing consensus to alternative valuation signals adds analytical depth beyond raw EPS numbers.Jack In Quarterly Gross Profit | 91.77 Million |
The concept of mean reversion suggests that Jack In's price will eventually return toward its long-run average. High prices may deter value investors, while unusually low prices often attract buyers who anticipate a recovery.
Earnings per Share Projection vs Actual
The actual EPS reported by Jack In reflects real earnings performance verified through its financial statements. The expected EPS consensus for Jack In The is the result of analyst modeling and represents the market's pre-event benchmark. Weighted share count is used to normalize EPS across periods where the number of outstanding shares changes.Estimated Months Earnings per Share
Income investors tracking Jack In rely on EPS as a measure of earnings coverage for the dividend. A consistent EPS growth trajectory suggests management has both the intent and capacity to increase shareholder distributions over time. For a rounded view, compare EPS against free cash flow yield and the dividend payout ratios of sector peers.Quarterly Analyst Estimates and Surprise Metrics
For investors monitoring Jack In, earnings surprise data provides a historical record of how the market has repriced the stock after each quarterly report. Surprise direction and magnitude together determine whether a post-earnings move is likely to be sustained. Analyst EPS estimates evolve through the quarter based on guidance revisions and new sector information.
| Reported | Fiscal Date | Estimated EPS | Reported EPS | Surprise | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
null | null | null | null | null | 0 | ||
2026-02-18 | 2025-12-31 | 1.15 | 1.0 | -0.15 | 13 | ||
2025-11-19 | 2025-09-30 | 0.49 | 0.3 | -0.19 | 38 | ||
2025-08-06 | 2025-06-30 | 1.17 | 1.02 | -0.15 | 12 | ||
2025-05-14 | 2025-03-31 | 1.12 | -7.47 | -8.59 | 766 | ||
2025-02-25 | 2024-12-31 | 1.69 | 1.92 | 0.23 | 13 | ||
2024-11-20 | 2024-09-30 | 1.09 | 1.16 | 0.07 | 6 | ||
2024-08-06 | 2024-06-30 | 1.51 | 1.65 | 0.14 | 9 | ||
2024-05-14 | 2024-03-31 | 1.42 | 1.46 | 0.04 | 2 | ||
2024-02-21 | 2023-12-31 | 1.96 | 1.95 | -0.01 | 0 | ||
2023-11-21 | 2023-09-30 | 1.15 | 1.09 | -0.06 | 5 | ||
2023-08-09 | 2023-06-30 | 1.34 | 1.45 | 0.11 | 8 | ||
2023-05-17 | 2023-03-31 | 1.22 | 1.47 | 0.25 | 20 | ||
2023-03-01 | 2022-12-31 | 1.75 | 2.01 | 0.26 | 14 | ||
2022-11-22 | 2022-09-30 | 1.36 | 1.33 | -0.03 | 2 | ||
2022-08-10 | 2022-06-30 | 1.42 | 1.38 | -0.04 | 2 | ||
2022-05-26 | 2022-03-31 | 1.38 | 1.16 | -0.22 | 15 | ||
2022-02-23 | 2021-12-31 | 1.91 | 1.97 | 0.06 | 3 | ||
2021-11-23 | 2021-09-30 | 1.75 | 1.75 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2021-08-04 | 2021-06-30 | 1.49 | 1.78 | 0.29 | 19 | ||
2021-05-12 | 2021-03-31 | 1.29 | 1.48 | 0.19 | 14 | ||
2021-02-17 | 2020-12-31 | 1.77 | 2.16 | 0.39 | 22 | ||
2020-11-18 | 2020-09-30 | 1.14 | 1.61 | 0.47 | 41 | ||
2020-08-05 | 2020-06-30 | 1.03 | 1.37 | 0.34 | 33 | ||
2020-05-13 | 2020-03-31 | 0.66 | 0.5 | -0.16 | 24 | ||
2020-02-19 | 2019-12-31 | 1.38 | 1.17 | -0.21 | 15 | ||
2019-11-20 | 2019-09-30 | 0.96 | 0.95 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2019-08-07 | 2019-06-30 | 1 | 1.07 | 0.07 | 7 | ||
2019-05-15 | 2019-03-31 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.06 | 6 | ||
2019-02-20 | 2018-12-31 | 1.28 | 1.35 | 0.07 | 5 | ||
2018-11-19 | 2018-09-30 | 0.85 | 0.77 | -0.08 | 9 | ||
2018-08-08 | 2018-06-30 | 0.88 | 1.0 | 0.12 | 13 | ||
2018-05-16 | 2018-03-31 | 0.86 | 0.8 | -0.06 | 6 | ||
2018-02-21 | 2017-12-31 | 1.06 | 1.23 | 0.17 | 16 | ||
2017-11-29 | 2017-09-30 | 0.89 | 0.73 | -0.16 | 17 | ||
2017-08-09 | 2017-06-30 | 1.05 | 0.99 | -0.06 | 5 | ||
2017-05-16 | 2017-03-31 | 0.91 | 0.98 | 0.07 | 7 | ||
2017-02-22 | 2016-12-31 | 1.24 | 1.18 | -0.06 | 4 | ||
2016-11-21 | 2016-09-30 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 0.15 | 17 | ||
2016-08-03 | 2016-06-30 | 0.87 | 1.07 | 0.2 | 22 | ||
2016-05-11 | 2016-03-31 | 0.7 | 0.85 | 0.15 | 21 | ||
2016-02-17 | 2015-12-31 | 1.03 | 0.93 | -0.1 | 9 | ||
2015-11-17 | 2015-09-30 | 0.65 | 0.62 | -0.03 | 4 | ||
2015-08-05 | 2015-06-30 | 0.73 | 0.76 | 0.03 | 4 | ||
2015-05-13 | 2015-03-31 | 0.67 | 0.69 | 0.02 | 2 | ||
2015-02-17 | 2014-12-31 | 0.87 | 0.93 | 0.06 | 6 | ||
2014-11-18 | 2014-09-30 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.01 | 1 | ||
2014-08-06 | 2014-06-30 | 0.57 | 0.65 | 0.08 | 14 | ||
2014-05-14 | 2014-03-31 | 0.52 | 0.51 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2014-02-19 | 2013-12-31 | 0.66 | 0.75 | 0.09 | 13 | ||
2013-11-20 | 2013-09-30 | 0.39 | 0.45 | 0.06 | 15 | ||
2013-08-07 | 2013-06-30 | 0.38 | 0.41 | 0.03 | 7 | ||
2013-05-15 | 2013-03-31 | 0.31 | 0.33 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2013-02-20 | 2012-12-31 | 0.39 | 0.54 | 0.15 | 38 | ||
2012-11-19 | 2012-09-30 | 0.37 | 0.43 | 0.06 | 16 | ||
2012-08-08 | 2012-06-30 | 0.35 | 0.26 | -0.09 | 25 | ||
2012-05-16 | 2012-03-31 | 0.32 | 0.48 | 0.16 | 50 | ||
2012-02-22 | 2011-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 8 | ||
2011-11-21 | 2011-09-30 | 0.4 | 0.49 | 0.09 | 22 | ||
2011-08-10 | 2011-06-30 | 0.4 | 0.38 | -0.02 | 5 | ||
2011-05-18 | 2011-03-31 | 0.2 | 0.13 | -0.07 | 35 | ||
2011-02-23 | 2010-12-31 | 0.46 | 0.61 | 0.15 | 32 | ||
2010-11-22 | 2010-09-30 | 0.36 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 11 | ||
2010-08-04 | 2010-06-30 | 0.53 | 0.5 | -0.03 | 5 | ||
2010-05-12 | 2010-03-31 | 0.4 | 0.32 | -0.08 | 20 | ||
2010-02-17 | 2009-12-31 | 0.45 | 0.43 | -0.02 | 4 | ||
2009-11-18 | 2009-09-30 | 0.55 | 0.7 | 0.15 | 27 | ||
2009-08-04 | 2009-06-30 | 0.58 | 0.57 | -0.01 | 1 | ||
2009-05-13 | 2009-03-31 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.07 | 15 | ||
2009-02-17 | 2008-12-31 | 0.52 | 0.49 | -0.03 | 5 | ||
2008-11-18 | 2008-09-30 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.02 | 4 | ||
2008-08-05 | 2008-06-30 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2008-05-14 | 2008-03-31 | 0.43 | 0.44 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2008-02-20 | 2007-12-31 | 0.57 | 0.6 | 0.03 | 5 | ||
2007-11-16 | 2007-09-30 | 0.39 | 0.43 | 0.04 | 10 | ||
2007-08-08 | 2007-06-30 | 0.45 | 0.54 | 0.09 | 20 | ||
2007-05-16 | 2007-03-31 | 0.35 | 0.4 | 0.05 | 14 | ||
2007-02-21 | 2006-12-31 | 0.41 | 0.52 | 0.11 | 26 | ||
2006-11-21 | 2006-09-30 | 0.33 | 0.48 | 0.15 | 45 | ||
2006-08-08 | 2006-06-30 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.06 | 18 | ||
2006-05-16 | 2006-03-31 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2006-02-22 | 2005-12-31 | 0.34 | 0.35 | 0.01 | 2 | ||
2005-11-30 | 2005-09-30 | 0.3 | 0.32 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2005-08-10 | 2005-06-30 | 0.3 | 0.33 | 0.03 | 10 | ||
2005-05-18 | 2005-03-31 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.03 | 12 | ||
2005-02-23 | 2004-12-31 | 0.33 | 0.34 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2004-11-17 | 2004-09-30 | 0.25 | 0.28 | 0.03 | 12 | ||
2004-08-04 | 2004-06-30 | 0.27 | 0.29 | 0.02 | 7 | ||
2004-05-12 | 2004-03-31 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 28 | ||
2004-02-18 | 2003-12-31 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.03 | 11 | ||
2003-11-12 | 2003-09-30 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2003-08-06 | 2003-06-30 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 0.03 | 12 | ||
2003-05-14 | 2003-03-31 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2003-02-19 | 2002-12-31 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2002-11-13 | 2002-09-30 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2002-07-31 | 2002-06-30 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2002-05-08 | 2002-03-31 | 0.22 | 0.23 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2002-02-13 | 2001-12-31 | 0.32 | 0.34 | 0.02 | 6 | ||
2001-11-07 | 2001-09-30 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2001-07-31 | 2001-06-30 | 0.26 | 0.28 | 0.02 | 7 | ||
2001-05-08 | 2001-03-31 | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
2001-02-13 | 2000-12-31 | 0.3 | 0.31 | 0.01 | 3 | ||
2000-11-06 | 2000-09-30 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
2000-08-01 | 2000-06-30 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 8 | ||
2000-05-09 | 2000-03-31 | 0.2 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 5 | ||
2000-02-15 | 1999-12-31 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 4 | ||
1999-11-08 | 1999-09-30 | 0.22 | 0.22 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1999-07-26 | 1999-06-30 | 0.2 | 0.22 | 0.02 | 10 | ||
1999-05-03 | 1999-03-31 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.03 | 20 | ||
1999-02-09 | 1998-12-31 | 0.18 | 0.2 | 0.02 | 11 | ||
1998-11-04 | 1998-09-30 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 6 | ||
1998-07-28 | 1998-06-30 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.01 | 6 | ||
1998-05-06 | 1998-03-31 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1998-02-04 | 1997-12-31 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-11-04 | 1997-09-30 | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.0 | 0 | ||
1997-07-30 | 1997-06-30 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.02 | 18 | ||
1997-05-07 | 1997-03-31 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.02 | 28 | ||
1997-02-06 | 1996-12-31 | 0.09 | 0.12 | 0.03 | 33 | ||
1996-11-06 | 1996-09-30 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.02 | 33 | ||
1996-07-24 | 1996-06-30 | 0.04 | 0.07 | 0.03 | 75 | ||
1996-05-01 | 1996-03-31 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 33 | ||
1996-02-04 | 1995-12-31 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 100 | ||
1995-11-06 | 1995-09-30 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 400 |
Use Jack In in pair-trading
A pair strategy built around Jack In The is useful when investors want to reduce directional market exposure while still expressing a relative-value idea. The key question is whether the second leg adds real hedge value instead of just creating a more complex version of the same risk.
Jack In Pair Trading
Jack In The Pair Trading Analysis
Correlation analysis helps investors find suitable substitutes for Jack In during tax-loss harvesting periods. Selling Jack In The at a loss and immediately repurchasing it would violate IRS wash-sale rules, so a correlated replacement asset is required to maintain portfolio.
Measuring the statistical correlation of Jack In against other instruments helps investors understand portfolio diversification. A correlation near zero implies that Jack In provides genuine diversification benefits, while high positive correlations suggest redundant exposures.
Correlation analysis and pair evaluation for Jack In can support hedging context. The approach can be applied within sectors or across broader universes.Use Investing Themes to Complement your Jack In position
With 244.14 Million market cap in the Restaurants industry, Jack In The works well as a smaller-cap core holding around which broader thematic baskets can be built. Jack In The 244.14 Million smaller-cap footprint in Restaurants aligns sector exposure with portfolio construction goals rather than adding an isolated Consumer Cyclical position.
Did You Try This Idea?
Run Synthetics Thematic Idea Now
Synthetics
Companies involved in production of silicon and other synthetic products . The Synthetics theme has 37 constituents at this time.
Whether used as a passive allocation or an active trading idea, the Synthetics Theme provides a structured starting point for portfolio construction.
| View All Next | Launch |